These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32990961)

  • 1. Using Radiofrequency Technology to Prevent Retained Sponges and Improve Patient Outcomes.
    Primiano M; Sparks D; Murphy J; Glaser K; McNett M
    AORN J; 2020 Oct; 112(4):345-352. PubMed ID: 32990961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retained surgical sponges: findings from incident reports and a cost-benefit analysis of radiofrequency technology.
    Williams TL; Tung DK; Steelman VM; Chang PK; Szekendi MK
    J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Sep; 219(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 25081938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Radiofrequency Technology on Time Spent Searching for Surgical Sponges and Associated Costs.
    Steelman VM; Schaapveld AG; Storm HE; Perkhounkova Y; Shane DM
    AORN J; 2019 Jun; 109(6):718-727. PubMed ID: 31135978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of radiofrequency device sensitivity for the detection of retained surgical sponges in patients with morbid obesity.
    Steelman VM; Alasagheirin MH
    Arch Surg; 2012 Oct; 147(10):955-60. PubMed ID: 23070411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Hidden Costs of Reconciling Surgical Sponge Counts.
    Steelman VM; Schaapveld AG; Perkhounkova Y; Storm HE; Mathias M
    AORN J; 2015 Nov; 102(5):498-506. PubMed ID: 26514707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevention of retained surgical items.
    Feldman DL
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2011; 78(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 22069210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity of detection of radiofrequency surgical sponges: a prospective, cross-over study.
    Steelman VM
    Am J Surg; 2011 Feb; 201(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 21266216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Role of Radio Frequency Detection System Embedded Surgical Sponges in Preventing Retained Surgical Sponges: A Prospective Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery.
    Inaba K; Okoye O; Aksoy H; Skiada D; Ault G; Sener S; Lam L; Benjamin E; Demetriades D
    Ann Surg; 2016 Oct; 264(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 27433911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radio-frequency surgical sponge detection: a new way to lower the odds of leaving sponges (and similar items) in patients.
    Health Devices; 2008 Jul; 37(7):193-202. PubMed ID: 18771206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The retained surgical sponge, an ongoing surgical problem].
    Keeman JN
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Feb; 146(6):245-6. PubMed ID: 11865651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Use of Radiofrequency Detection to Mitigate the Risk of Retained Surgical Sponges.
    Bardes JM; Inaba K
    Adv Surg; 2017 Sep; 51(1):219-227. PubMed ID: 28797342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radio frequency identification (RFID) applied to surgical sponges.
    Rogers A; Jones E; Oleynikov D
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Jul; 21(7):1235-7. PubMed ID: 17484000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementing AORN recommended practices for prevention of retained surgical items.
    Goldberg JL; Feldman DL
    AORN J; 2012 Feb; 95(2):205-16; quiz 217-9. PubMed ID: 22283912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Re: Retained surgical sponges: findings from incident reports and a cost-benefit analysis of radiofrequency technology.
    Babayan RK
    J Urol; 2015 Jun; 193(6):2019. PubMed ID: 25986812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementation of a protocol to reduce occurrence of retained sponges after vaginal delivery.
    Lutgendorf MA; Schindler LL; Hill JB; Magann EF; O'Boyle JD
    Mil Med; 2011 Jun; 176(6):702-4. PubMed ID: 21702393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A system-wide initiative to prevent retained vaginal sponges.
    Chagolla BA; Gibbs VC; Keats JP; Pelletreau B
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2011; 36(5):312-7. PubMed ID: 21857202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retained surgical sponges, needles and instruments.
    Hariharan D; Lobo DN
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2013 Mar; 95(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 23484986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiofrequency-Based Identification Medical Device: An Evaluable Solution for Surgical Sponge Retrieval?
    Lazzaro A; Corona A; Iezzi L; Quaresima S; Armisi L; Piccolo I; Medaglia CM; Sbrenni S; Sileri P; Rosato N; Gaspari AL; Di Lorenzo N
    Surg Innov; 2017 Jun; 24(3):268-275. PubMed ID: 28178883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology.
    Macario A; Morris D; Morris S
    Arch Surg; 2006 Jul; 141(7):659-62. PubMed ID: 16847236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using a data-matrix-coded sponge counting system across a surgical practice: impact after 18 months.
    Cima RR; Kollengode A; Clark J; Pool S; Weisbrod C; Amstutz GJ; Deschamps C
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2011 Feb; 37(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 21939132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.