171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32991467)
1. Evaluation of automated volumetric breast density software in comparison with visual assessments in an Asian population: A retrospective observational study.
Rahmat K; Ab Mumin N; Ramli Hamid MT; Fadzli F; Ng WL; Muhammad Gowdh NF
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Sep; 99(39):e22405. PubMed ID: 32991467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Kim JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiological assessment of breast density by visual classification (BI-RADS) compared to automated volumetric digital software (Quantra): implications for clinical practice.
Regini E; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Ghione G; Luparia A; Campanino PP; Bianchi CC; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Radiol Med; 2014 Oct; 119(10):741-9. PubMed ID: 24610166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists' classification and their inter-observer variation.
Østerås BH; Martinsen AC; Brandal SH; Chaudhry KN; Eben E; Haakenaasen U; Falk RS; Skaane P
Acta Radiol; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1178-85. PubMed ID: 26792823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast Density Evaluation According to BI-RADS 5th Edition on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: AI Automated Assessment Versus Human Visual Assessment.
Tari DU; Santonastaso R; De Lucia DR; Santarsiere M; Pinto F
J Pers Med; 2023 Mar; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 37108994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fully automated measurements of volumetric breast density adapted for BIRADS 5th edition: a comparison with visual assessment.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Kim JA
Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 32910685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between software volumetric breast density estimates in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography images in a large public screening cohort.
Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Fieselmann A; Lång K; Sartor H
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):330-336. PubMed ID: 29943180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing Visually Assessed BI-RADS Breast Density and Automated Volumetric Breast Density Software: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Breast Cancer Screening Setting.
van der Waal D; den Heeten GJ; Pijnappel RM; Schuur KH; Timmers JM; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136667. PubMed ID: 26335569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of breast parenchymal density with QUANTRA software.
Pahwa S; Hari S; Thulkar S; Angraal S
Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2015; 25(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 26752820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the association between mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer using Quantra software and the BI-RADS classification.
Wang JM; Zhao HG; Liu TT; Wang FY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(46):e23112. PubMed ID: 33181680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of variability in breast density assessment by BI-RADS category according to the level of experience.
Eom HJ; Cha JH; Kang JW; Choi WJ; Kim HJ; Go E
Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):527-532. PubMed ID: 28766978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations.
Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Boyer B; Gauthier E; Helin V; Loshkajian A; Ragusa S; Delaloge S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3830-3838. PubMed ID: 30770972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories.
Singh T; Sharma M; Singla V; Khandelwal N
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification.
Ciatto S; Bernardi D; Calabrese M; Durando M; Gentilini MA; Mariscotti G; Monetti F; Moriconi E; Pesce B; Roselli A; Stevanin C; Tapparelli M; Houssami N
Breast; 2012 Aug; 21(4):503-6. PubMed ID: 22285387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast density (BD) assessment with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): Agreement between Quantra™ and 5th edition BI-RADS
Ekpo EU; Mello-Thoms C; Rickard M; Brennan PC; McEntee MF
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():185-190. PubMed ID: 27769015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Quantra Hologic Volumetric Computerized Breast Density Software in Comparison With Manual Interpretation in a Diverse Population.
Richard-Davis G; Whittemore B; Disher A; Rice VM; Lenin RB; Dollins C; Siegel ER; Eswaran H
Breast Cancer (Auckl); 2018; 12():1178223418759296. PubMed ID: 29511356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
