These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32991643)
1. Effect of Manufacturing Technique on the Accuracy of Surgical Guides for Static Computer-Aided Implant Surgery. Abduo J; Lau D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(5):931-938. PubMed ID: 32991643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques. Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of surgical guides from 2 different desktop 3D printers for computed tomography-guided surgery. Gjelvold B; Mahmood DJH; Wennerberg A J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 30442377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of 3D Printing Orientation on the Accuracy of Implant Surgical Templates Fabricated By Desktop Printer. Tahir N; Abduo J J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):791-798. PubMed ID: 35067993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of 3D-printing method, resin material, and sterilization on the accuracy of virtually designed surgical implant guides. Keßler A; Dosch M; Reymus M; Folwaczny M J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 33573833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of metal sleeve-free 3D-printed implant surgical guides. Oh KC; Park JM; Shim JS; Kim JH; Kim JE; Kim JH Dent Mater; 2019 Mar; 35(3):468-476. PubMed ID: 30685109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the accuracy of implant placement using different drilling systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study. Sittikornpaiboon P; Arunjaroensuk S; Kaboosaya B; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 23(4):635-643. PubMed ID: 34288341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. El Kholy K; Lazarin R; Janner SFM; Faerber K; Buser R; Buser D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 31381178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of the tooth position, guided sleeve height, supporting length, manufacturing methods, and resin E-modulus on the in vitro accuracy of surgical implant guides in a free-end situation. Kessler A; Le V; Folwaczny M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Sep; 32(9):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 34218450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery. Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Seating accuracy of implant immediate provisional prostheses fabricated by digital workflow prior to implant placement by fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study. Abduo J; Lau D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 May; 32(5):608-618. PubMed ID: 33629440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of planning software and template design on the accuracy of static computer assisted implant surgery performed using guides fabricated with material extrusion technology: An in vitro study. Rothlauf S; Pieralli S; Wesemann C; Burkhardt F; Vach K; Kernen F; Spies BC J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104482. PubMed ID: 36931618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed. Bell CK; Sahl EF; Kim YJ; Rice DD Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used. Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov; 132(5):995-1004. PubMed ID: 36690552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: An in vitro study. Yeung M; Abdulmajeed A; Carrico CK; Deeb GR; Bencharit S J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):821-828. PubMed ID: 31653399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide. Kim T; Lee S; Kim GB; Hong D; Kwon J; Park JW; Kim N J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):195-201.e2. PubMed ID: 31753464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transfer accuracy of 3D printed versus CAD/CAM milled surgical guides for temporary orthodontic implants: A preclinical micro CT study. Schwärzler A; Ludwig B; Chitan P; Lettner S; Sagl B; Jonke E J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105060. PubMed ID: 38735471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology. Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of DLP and SLA printer technology on the accuracy of surgical guides for implant dentistry in free-end situations. Le V; Keßler A; Folwaczny M Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Sep; 26(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 36625374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]