These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32991790)

  • 1. Zero-cell corrections in random-effects meta-analyses.
    Weber F; Knapp G; Ickstadt K; Kundt G; Glass Ä
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):913-919. PubMed ID: 32991790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random-effects meta-analysis of few studies involving rare events.
    Günhan BK; Röver C; Friede T
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jan; 11(1):74-90. PubMed ID: 31348846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical methods for meta-analyses including information from studies without any events-add nothing to nothing and succeed nevertheless.
    Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1097-116. PubMed ID: 25446971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exact correction factor for estimating the OR in the presence of sparse data with a zero cell in 2 × 2 tables.
    Babu M; Mani T; Sappani M; George S; Bangdiwala SI; Jeyaseelan L
    Int J Biostat; 2024 May; 20(1):229-243. PubMed ID: 37159838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.
    Hong C; D Riley R; Chen Y
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 29055096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.
    Stijnen T; Hamza TH; Ozdemir P
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):3046-67. PubMed ID: 20827667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.
    Sweeting MJ; Sutton AJ; Lambert PC
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1351-75. PubMed ID: 15116347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Odds ratio for 2 × 2 tables: Mantel-Haenszel estimator, profile likelihood, and presence of surrogate responses.
    Banerjee B; Biswas A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):649-59. PubMed ID: 24697719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An 'unconditional-like' structure for the conditional estimator of odds ratio from 2 x 2 tables.
    Hanley JA; Miettinen OS
    Biom J; 2006 Feb; 48(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 16544810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analysis of rare binary events in treatment groups with unequal variability.
    Li L; Wang X
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):263-274. PubMed ID: 28760075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios.
    Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):426-442. PubMed ID: 32112619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of correction methods on rare-event meta-analysis.
    Zabriskie BN; Cole N; Baldauf J; Decker C
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jan; 15(1):130-151. PubMed ID: 37946591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mantel-Haenszel-type inference for cumulative odds ratios with a stratified ordinal response.
    Liu IM; Agresti A
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1223-34. PubMed ID: 8962452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Avoiding zero between-study variance estimates in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Chung Y; Rabe-Hesketh S; Choi IH
    Stat Med; 2013 Oct; 32(23):4071-89. PubMed ID: 23670939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis of binary outcomes via generalized linear mixed models: a simulation study.
    Bakbergenuly I; Kulinskaya E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 29973146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A method of moments estimator for random effect multivariate meta-analysis.
    Chen H; Manning AK; Dupuis J
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1278-84. PubMed ID: 22551393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis and the reversed Theorem of the Means.
    Edwardes MD
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 26052955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis of incidence rate data in the presence of zero events.
    Spittal MJ; Pirkis J; Gurrin LC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():42. PubMed ID: 25925169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation study methods for estimating odds ratio in 2 × 2 × J tables when exposure is misclassified.
    Nouri B; Zare N; Ayatollahi SM
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():170120. PubMed ID: 24454529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.