These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32991790)

  • 21. A generalized-weights solution to sample overlap in meta-analysis.
    Bom PRD; Rachinger H
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):812-832. PubMed ID: 32790019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simulation-based estimation of mean and standard deviation for meta-analysis via Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC).
    Kwon D; Reis IM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Aug; 15():61. PubMed ID: 26264850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bias and correction for the log response ratio in ecological meta-analysis.
    Lajeunesse MJ
    Ecology; 2015 Aug; 96(8):2056-63. PubMed ID: 26405731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis.
    Berkey CS; Hoaglin DC; Mosteller F; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 1995 Feb; 14(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 7746979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Meta-analysis with zero-event studies: a comparative study with application to COVID-19 data.
    Wei JJ; Lin EX; Shi JD; Yang K; Hu ZL; Zeng XT; Tong TJ
    Mil Med Res; 2021 Jul; 8(1):41. PubMed ID: 34217371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A finite mixture method for outlier detection and robustness in meta-analysis.
    Beath KJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 26052953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Median bias reduction in random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Kyriakou S; Kosmidis I; Sartori N
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1622-1636. PubMed ID: 29717942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data.
    Ju K; Lin L; Chu H; Cheng LL; Xu C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32539721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bartlett-type corrections and bootstrap adjustments of likelihood-based inference methods for network meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Nagashima K; Maruo K; Gosho M; Furukawa TA
    Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(7):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29250816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Bender R; Kuss O; Langan D; Higgins JPT; Knapp G; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 30129707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Combining estimates of the odds ratio: the state of the art.
    Emerson JD
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1994; 3(2):157-78. PubMed ID: 7952430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Deficits and remedy of the standard random effects methods in meta-analysis.
    Ziegler S; Koch A; Victor N
    Methods Inf Med; 2001 May; 40(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 11424301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimation of an overall standardized mean difference in random-effects meta-analysis if the distribution of random effects departs from normal.
    Rubio-Aparicio M; López-López JA; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Viechtbauer W; Van den Noortgate W
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):489-503. PubMed ID: 29989344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing results of large clinical trials to those of meta-analyses.
    Moses LE; Mosteller F; Buehler JH
    Stat Med; 2002 Mar; 21(6):793-800. PubMed ID: 11870817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Likelihood ratio meta-analysis: New motivation and approach for an old method.
    Dormuth CR; Filion KB; Platt RW
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2016 Mar; 47():259-65. PubMed ID: 26837056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes.
    Turner RM; Omar RZ; Yang M; Goldstein H; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2000 Dec; 19(24):3417-32. PubMed ID: 11122505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nonparametric estimation of the random effects distribution for the risk or rate ratio in rare events meta-analysis with the arm-based and contrast-based approaches.
    Sangnawakij P; Böhning D; Holling H; Jansen K
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(4):706-730. PubMed ID: 38111986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical heterogeneity in random-effect meta-analysis: Between-study boundary estimate problem.
    Yoneoka D; Henmi M
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(21):4131-4145. PubMed ID: 31286537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The SIMEX approach to measurement error correction in meta-analysis with baseline risk as covariate.
    Guolo A
    Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(12):2062-76. PubMed ID: 24339017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Univariate and bivariate likelihood-based meta-analysis methods performed comparably when marginal sensitivity and specificity were the targets of inference.
    Dahabreh IJ; Trikalinos TA; Lau J; Schmid CH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():8-17. PubMed ID: 28063915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.