These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32991942)

  • 1. The essential value of the alternatives of the suboptimal choice procedure is different for pigeons and rats.
    López-Tolsa GE; Niño JM; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2020 Dec; 181():104245. PubMed ID: 32991942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suboptimal choice by pigeons is eliminated when key-pecking behavior is replaced by treadle-pressing.
    González-Torres R; Flores J; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2020 Sep; 178():104157. PubMed ID: 32497555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rats' preferences in the suboptimal choice procedure: Evaluating the impact of reinforcement probability and conditioned inhibitors.
    Alba R; Rodríguez W; Martínez M; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():574-582. PubMed ID: 29689334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rats are optimal in a choice task in which pigeons are not.
    Trujano RE; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2015 Oct; 119():22-7. PubMed ID: 26200394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of contingency discriminability in suboptimal choice.
    López-Tolsa GE; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2021 Dec; 193():104511. PubMed ID: 34562512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.
    Stagner JP; Laude JR; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 23066982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal behavior by rats in a choice task is associated to a persistent conditioned inhibition effect.
    Trujano RE; López P; Rojas-Leguizamón M; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2016 Sep; 130():65-70. PubMed ID: 27421608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies.
    Smith AP; Bailey AR; Chow JJ; Beckmann JS; Zentall TR
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159336. PubMed ID: 27441394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The incentive salience of the stimuli biases rats' preferences in the "suboptimal choice" procedure.
    Orduña V; Alba R
    Behav Processes; 2020 Mar; 172():104057. PubMed ID: 31954809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Δ-∑ hypothesis: How contrast and reinforcement rate combine to generate suboptimal choice.
    González VV; Macías A; Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 May; 113(3):591-608. PubMed ID: 32237091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How suboptimal is suboptimal choice?
    Hinnenkamp JE; Shahan TA; Madden GJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jan; 107(1):136-150. PubMed ID: 28101923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suboptimal choice and initial-link requirement.
    Pisklak JM; McDevitt MA; Dunn RM; Spetch ML
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Nov; 112(3):242-253. PubMed ID: 31680265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the Δ-∑ hypothesis in the suboptimal choice task: Same delta with different probabilities of reinforcement.
    González VV; Macías A; Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Sep; 114(2):233-247. PubMed ID: 33460139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency and value both matter in the suboptimal choice procedure.
    Pisklak JM; McDevitt MA; Dunn RM; Spetch ML
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jan; 111(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 30569554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Does the predictive value of the conditioned reinforcer alone determine choice?
    Case JP; Zentall TR
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():320-326. PubMed ID: 30077654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incentive salience attribution is not the sole determinant of suboptimal choice in rats: Conditioned inhibition matters.
    Martínez M; Alba R; Rodríguez W; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2017 Sep; 142():99-105. PubMed ID: 28673839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast between what is expected and what occurs increases pigeon's suboptimal choice.
    Zentall TR; Andrews DM; Case JP
    Anim Cogn; 2019 Jan; 22(1):81-87. PubMed ID: 30430348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pigeon's choice depends primarily on the value of the signal for the outcome rather than its frequency or contrast.
    Zentall TR; Peng DN; Mueller PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Apr; 48(2):135-144. PubMed ID: 35533106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of time between trials on rats' and pigeons' choices with probabilistic delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE; Biondi DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 21541170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.