These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3299462)

  • 21. [New materials from Spofa-Dental, Prague].
    Komrska J
    Zahntechnik (Berl); 1974 Apr; 15(4):133-7. PubMed ID: 4532409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of measurement site on the dimensional accuracy of die-forming materials and techniques.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; Theodotou N; Glaros AG; Williams K
    Gen Dent; 2004; 52(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 15206253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Alginate impressions and study models.
    Baum L; Sponzo MT
    J Conn State Dent Assoc; 1979; 53(1):35-6. PubMed ID: 118195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Model making made easy.
    Morris K
    Dent Assist; 2011; 80(2):14-6. PubMed ID: 21568217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of indirect stone models made from reversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Nakazato M; Fusayama T
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1971 Mar; 18(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 4930636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Inlay fabrication by the direct method].
    Arnold M; Wenzel W
    Dtsch Stomatol; 1966 Oct; 16(10):781-91. PubMed ID: 5332694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Disinfection of impressions.
    FDI World; 1993; 2(5):18-9. PubMed ID: 9552810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [On the shape of monodental impressions with copper bands and Kerr's paste and the preparation of copper models].
    Guasta G
    Minerva Stomatol; 1968 Jun; 17(6):580-6. PubMed ID: 4876336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Accurate reproduction of the gingival margins and the papillae].
    Fanta J
    Dent Labor (Munch); 1983 Aug; 31(8):979-82. PubMed ID: 6365629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy die material using different polymerization methods.
    Prisco R; Cozzolino G; Vigolo P
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 19054302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Using polyvinyl impressions for study models: a case report.
    Perry R
    Dent Today; 2004 Oct; 23(10):106-7. PubMed ID: 15559460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An accurate, single, platform-level impression technique for the fabrication of prosthetic restorations on dental implants.
    Marder MZ; Marder RW
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Oct; 25(5):495-9. PubMed ID: 16250571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Master cast implant impression: using the open-tray technique.
    Briley TF
    Dent Implantol Update; 2002 Oct; 13(10):73-80. PubMed ID: 12455316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.