BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32995561)

  • 1. A stepwise approach to move from a cleavage-stage to a blastocyst-stage transfer policy for all patients in the IVF clinic.
    De Croo I; De Sutter P; Tilleman K
    Hum Reprod Open; 2020; 2020(3):hoaa034. PubMed ID: 32995561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No difference in cumulative live birth rates between cleavage versus blastocyst transfer in patients with four or fewer zygotes: results from a retrospective study.
    De Croo I; Colman R; De Sutter P; Stoop D; Tilleman K
    Hum Reprod Open; 2022; 2022(3):hoac031. PubMed ID: 35919767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes.
    Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Dusi L; Buffo L; Amendola MG; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Bruno G; Stoppa M; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):785-795. PubMed ID: 32240287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction of multiple pregnancies in the advanced maternal age population after implementation of an elective single embryo transfer policy coupled with enhanced embryo selection: pre- and post-intervention study.
    Ubaldi FM; Capalbo A; Colamaria S; Ferrero S; Maggiulli R; Vajta G; Sapienza F; Cimadomo D; Giuliani M; Gravotta E; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2097-106. PubMed ID: 26150408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle.
    De Vos A; Van Landuyt L; Santos-Ribeiro S; Camus M; Van de Velde H; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2442-2449. PubMed ID: 27619768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrification.
    Saket Z; Källén K; Lundin K; Magnusson Å; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod Open; 2021; 2021(3):hoab021. PubMed ID: 34195386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fresh transfer of Day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded Day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach?
    Tannus S; Cohen Y; Henderson S; Al Ma'mari N; Shavit T; Son WY; Dahan MH
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 30517719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduced oxygen concentration during human IVF culture improves embryo utilization and cumulative pregnancy rates per cycle.
    Van Montfoort APA; Arts EGJM; Wijnandts L; Sluijmer A; Pelinck MJ; Land JA; Van Echten-Arends J
    Hum Reprod Open; 2020; 2020(1):hoz036. PubMed ID: 31989044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cumulative live birth rates following blastocyst- versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first complete cycle of IVF: a population-based retrospective cohort study.
    Cameron NJ; Bhattacharya S; McLernon DJ
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2365-2374. PubMed ID: 32949234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cumulative pregnancy rates of two strategies: Day 3 fresh embryo transfer followed by Day 3 or Day 5/6 vitrification and embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mengels A; Van Muylder A; Peeraer K; Luyten J; Laenen A; Spiessens C; Debrock S
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 39(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 37886820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
    Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perinatal and maternal outcome after vitrification of blastocysts: a Nordic study in singletons from the CoNARTaS group.
    Ginström Ernstad E; Spangmose AL; Opdahl S; Henningsen AA; Romundstad LB; Tiitinen A; Gissler M; Wennerholm UB; Pinborg A; Bergh C; Malchau SS
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2282-2289. PubMed ID: 31687765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6.
    Ferreux L; Bourdon M; Sallem A; Santulli P; Barraud-Lange V; Le Foll N; Maignien C; Chapron C; de Ziegler D; Wolf JP; Pocate-Cheriet K
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 33(3):390-398. PubMed ID: 29394365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Leave the past behind: women's reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts' euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers.
    Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Soscia D; Giancani A; Scepi E; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar; 36(4):929-940. PubMed ID: 33608730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is a freeze-all policy the optimal solution to circumvent the effect of late follicular elevated progesterone? A multicentric matched-control retrospective study analysing cumulative live birth rate in 942 non-elective freeze-all cycles.
    Racca A; Vanni VS; Somigliana E; Reschini M; Viganò P; Santos-Ribeiro S; Drakopoulos P; Tournaye H; Verheyen G; Papaleo E; Candiani M; Blockeel C
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Aug; 36(9):2463-2472. PubMed ID: 34223890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
    Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double vitrification and warming does not compromise the chance of live birth after single unbiopsied blastocyst transfer.
    Makieva S; Sachs MK; Xie M; Velasco A; El-Hadad S; Kalaitzopoulos DR; Dedes I; Stiller R; Leeners B
    Hum Reprod Open; 2023; 2023(4):hoad037. PubMed ID: 37840636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation.
    Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Levi-Setti PE; Soscia D; Orlando G; Albani E; Parini V; Stoppa M; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Ievoli E; Maggiulli R; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 30265329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abnormal cleavage up to Day 3 does not compromise live birth and neonatal outcomes of embryos that have achieved full blastulation: a retrospective cohort study.
    Lee T; Peirce K; Natalwala J; Chapple V; Mark PJ; Sanders K; Liu Y
    Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 39(5):955-962. PubMed ID: 38553025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.