BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32995847)

  • 21. Bias Formulas for Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects When Unmeasured Confounding Is Present.
    le Cessie S
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 26426943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mediational E-values: Approximate Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Mediator-Outcome Confounding.
    Smith LH; VanderWeele TJ
    Epidemiology; 2019 Nov; 30(6):835-837. PubMed ID: 31348008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value.
    VanderWeele TJ; Ding P
    Ann Intern Med; 2017 Aug; 167(4):268-274. PubMed ID: 28693043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimating Bias Due to Unmeasured Confounding in Oral Health Epidemiology.
    Mittinty MN
    Community Dent Health; 2020 Feb; 37(1):84-89. PubMed ID: 32031350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sensitivity analyses of unmeasured and partially-measured confounders using multiple imputation in a vaccine safety study.
    Xu S; Clarke CL; Newcomer SR; Daley MF; Glanz JM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2021 Sep; 30(9):1200-1213. PubMed ID: 33988275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Negative Control Exposures: Causal Effect Identifiability and Use in Probabilistic-bias and Bayesian Analyses With Unmeasured Confounders.
    Flanders WD; Waller LA; Zhang Q; Getahun D; Silverberg M; Goodman M
    Epidemiology; 2022 Nov; 33(6):832-839. PubMed ID: 35895515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
    Fewell Z; Davey Smith G; Sterne JA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 166(6):646-55. PubMed ID: 17615092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis approaches to address treatment nonadherence in pragmatic trials with point-treatment settings: a simulation study.
    Hossain MB; Mosquera L; Karim ME
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):46. PubMed ID: 35172746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acetaminophen use during pregnancy and the risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A causal association or bias?
    Masarwa R; Platt RW; Filion KB
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2020 May; 34(3):309-317. PubMed ID: 31916282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Causal directed acyclic graphs and the direction of unmeasured confounding bias.
    VanderWeele TJ; Hernán MA; Robins JM
    Epidemiology; 2008 Sep; 19(5):720-8. PubMed ID: 18633331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
    Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Confounder adjustment in observational comparative effectiveness researches: (2) statistical adjustment approaches for unmeasured confounders].
    Huang LL; Wei YY; Chen F
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 40(11):1450-1455. PubMed ID: 31838820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative Bias Analysis of the Association between Occupational Radiation Exposure and Ischemic Heart Disease Mortality in UK Nuclear Workers.
    de Vocht F; Martin RM; Hidajat M; Wakeford R
    Radiat Res; 2021 Dec; 196(6):574-586. PubMed ID: 34370860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Probe variables: a tool for identification of unmeasured confounders in an observational study].
    Hong X; Yin JC; Wang B
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 42(4):735-739. PubMed ID: 34814460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in causal mediation analysis.
    McCandless LC; Somers JM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):515-531. PubMed ID: 28882092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Model specification and unmeasured confounders in partially ecologic analyses based on group proportions of exposed.
    Björk J; Strömberg U
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2005 Jun; 31(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 15999570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Limitations and Misinterpretations of E-Values for Sensitivity Analyses of Observational Studies.
    Ioannidis JPA; Tan YJ; Blum MR
    Ann Intern Med; 2019 Jan; 170(2):108-111. PubMed ID: 30597486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Summarizing causal differences in survival curves in the presence of unmeasured confounding.
    Martínez-Camblor P; MacKenzie TA; Staiger DO; Goodney PP; O'Malley AJ
    Int J Biostat; 2020 Sep; 17(2):223-240. PubMed ID: 32946418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding for binary outcomes using confounding functions.
    Kasza J; Wolfe R; Schuster T
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 46(4):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 28338913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A probabilistic bias analysis on the magnitude of unmeasured confounding: The impact of driving mileage on road traffic crashes.
    Thiesmeier R; Skyving M; Möller J; Orsini N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107144. PubMed ID: 37473524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.