351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32996186)
1. Preoperative multidetector computed tomography for isolated surgical aortic valve replacement: Planning for future transcatheter options.
Basman C; Seetharam K; Johnson J; Hemli JM; Brinster DR; Patel NC; Jacob Scheinerman S; Kliger CA; Pirelli L
J Card Surg; 2020 Dec; 35(12):3354-3361. PubMed ID: 32996186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.
Head SJ; Reardon MJ; Deeb GM; Van Mieghem NM; Popma JJ; Gleason TG; Williams MR; Radhakrishnan S; Fremes S; Oh JK; Chang Y; Boulware MJ; Kappetein AP
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 12(4):e007396. PubMed ID: 30929507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of preoperative electrocardiographic-gated computed tomography in predicting the accurate aortic annulus diameter in surgical aortic valve replacement.
Kimura S; Ushijima T; Fujita S; Sonoda H; Oishi Y; Tanoue Y; Shiose A
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Mar; 69(3):466-471. PubMed ID: 32865765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedure in Patients with Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Deterioration.
Reul RM; Ramchandani MK; Reardon MJ
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2017; 13(3):132-141. PubMed ID: 29743998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis comparing valve-in-valve TAVR and redo-SAVR in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve.
Saleem S; Ullah W; Syed MA; Megaly M; Thalambedu N; Younas S; Zahid S; Alam M; Virani SS; Verma DR; Abdul-Waheed M; Fischman DL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):940-947. PubMed ID: 34110684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Commissural Alignment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve and Native Aortic Valve Following Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and its Impact on Valvular Function and Coronary Filling.
Fuchs A; Kofoed KF; Yoon SH; Schaffner Y; Bieliauskas G; Thyregod HG; Makkar R; Søndergaard L; De Backer O; Bapat V
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(17):1733-1743. PubMed ID: 30121280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Isolated Redo Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Valve Replacement.
Patel PM; Chiou E; Cao Y; Binongo J; Guyton RA; Leshnower B; Grubb KJ; Chen EP
Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Aug; 112(2):539-545. PubMed ID: 33129775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of integration of a multidetector computed tomography annulus area sizing algorithm on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective, multicenter, controlled trial.
Binder RK; Webb JG; Willson AB; Urena M; Hansson NC; Norgaard BL; Pibarot P; Barbanti M; Larose E; Freeman M; Dumont E; Thompson C; Wheeler M; Moss RR; Yang TH; Pasian S; Hague CJ; Nguyen G; Raju R; Toggweiler S; Min JK; Wood DA; Rodés-Cabau J; Leipsic J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jul; 62(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 23684679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Prior Aortic Root Surgery: Insights From Virtual Modeling.
Brener MI; Yamabe T; Leb J; Khalique OK; Takayama H; George I
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(11):e009539. PubMed ID: 33131300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ahmed A; Levy KH
J Card Surg; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2486-2495. PubMed ID: 33797799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal pre-TAVR annulus sizing in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: area-derived perimeter by CT is the best-correlated measure with intraoperative sizing.
Wang Y; Wang M; Song G; Wang W; Lv B; Wang H; Wu Y
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):259-269. PubMed ID: 29926206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is intra-procedure three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiogram an alternative to preprocedure multidetector computed tomography for the measurement of the aortic annulus in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement?
Hafiz AM; Medranda GA; Kakouros N; Patel J; Kahan J; Gubernikoff G; Ray B; Paruchuri V; DeLeon J; Marzo K; Calixte R; Gaztanaga J
Echocardiography; 2017 Aug; 34(8):1195-1202. PubMed ID: 28722306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and readmissions for valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs. reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement: a contemporary assessment of real-world outcomes.
Hirji SA; Percy ED; Zogg CK; Malarczyk A; Harloff MT; Yazdchi F; Kaneko T
Eur Heart J; 2020 Aug; 41(29):2747-2755. PubMed ID: 32445575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Sizing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Rong LQ; Hameed I; Salemi A; Rahouma M; Khan FM; Wijeysundera HC; Angiolillo DJ; Shore-Lesserson L; Biondi-Zoccai G; Girardi LN; Fremes SE; Gaudino M
J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Oct; 8(19):e013463. PubMed ID: 31549579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture Improves the Hemodynamic Results of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Chhatriwalla AK; Allen KB; Saxon JT; Cohen DJ; Aggarwal S; Hart AJ; Baron SJ; Dvir D; Borkon AM
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 28698291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves.
Choi CH; Cheng V; Malaver D; Kon N; Kincaid EH; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1106-1115. PubMed ID: 30588736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis Sizing: Estimation and Prediction Using Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography.
Margaryan R; Kallushi E; Gilmanov D; Micelli A; Murzi M; Solinas M; Cerillo AG; Glauber M
Innovations (Phila); 2015; 10(4):230-5; discussion 235. PubMed ID: 26371451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.
Little SH; Oh JK; Gillam L; Sengupta PP; Orsinelli DA; Cavalcante JL; Chang JD; Adams DH; Zorn GL; Pollak AW; Abdelmoneim SS; Reardon MJ; Qiao H; Popma JJ
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27313280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting patient-prosthesis mismatch by aortic root evaluation before aortic valve replacement.
Maeda K; Kuratani T; Yoshioka D; Pak K; Shimamura K; Toda K; Sawa Y
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 158(1):61-69.e4. PubMed ID: 30685162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo aortic valve replacement: which procedure for which patient?
Hutt E; Mehra N; Desai MY
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2022 Dec; 20(12):911-918. PubMed ID: 36433699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
