68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32996360)
1. 3D printed high-resolution scaffold with hydrogel microfibers for providing excellent biocompatibility.
Ye W; Xie C; Liu Y; He Y; Gao Q; Ouyang A
J Biomater Appl; 2021 Jan; 35(6):633-642. PubMed ID: 32996360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of bilayer tissue-engineered scaffolds: combination of 3D printing and electrospinning methodologies.
Yilmaz H; Bedir T; Gursoy S; Kaya E; Senel I; Tinaz GB; Gunduz O; Ustundag CB
Biomed Mater; 2024 Jun; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 38838701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unveiling the versatility of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels: a comprehensive journey into biomedical applications.
Pramanik S; Alhomrani M; Alamri AS; Alsanie WF; Nainwal P; Kimothi V; Deepak A; Sargsyan AS
Biomed Mater; 2024 Jun; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 38768611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SLA-3d printed building and characteristics of GelMA/HAP biomaterials with gradient porous structure.
Chen Q; Zou B; Wang X; Zhou X; Yang G; Lai Q; Zhao Y
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Jul; 155():106553. PubMed ID: 38640694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A highly printable and biocompatible hydrogel composite for direct printing of soft and perfusable vasculature-like structures.
Suntornnond R; Tan EYS; An J; Chua CK
Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):16902. PubMed ID: 29203812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D-bioprinted GelMA/gelatin/amniotic membrane extract (AME) scaffold loaded with keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells for skin tissue engineering.
Pazhouhnia Z; Noori A; Farzin A; Khoshmaram K; Hoseinpour M; Ai J; Ebrahimi M; Lotfibakhshaiesh N
Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):12670. PubMed ID: 38830883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. GelMA-based hydrogel biomaterial scaffold: A versatile platform for regenerative endodontics.
Huang L; Chen X; Yang X; Zhang Y; Qiu X
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2024 May; 112(5):e35412. PubMed ID: 38701383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applications of Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) Hydrogels in Microfluidic Technique-Assisted Tissue Engineering.
Liu T; Weng W; Zhang Y; Sun X; Yang H
Molecules; 2020 Nov; 25(22):. PubMed ID: 33202954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An imprint-based approach to replicate nano- to microscale roughness on gelatin hydrogel scaffolds: surface characterization and effect on endothelialization.
Salehi A; Sprejz S; Ruehl H; Olayioye M; Cattaneo G
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2024 Jun; 35(8):1214-1235. PubMed ID: 38431849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D-Bioprinted GelMA Scaffold with ASCs and HUVECs for Engineering Vascularized Adipose Tissue.
Cheng MH; Chang CW; Wang J; Bupphathong S; Huang W; Lin CH
ACS Appl Bio Mater; 2024 Jan; 7(1):406-415. PubMed ID: 38148527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D-printed gelatin scaffolds of differing pore geometry modulate hepatocyte function and gene expression.
Lewis PL; Green RM; Shah RN
Acta Biomater; 2018 Mar; 69():63-70. PubMed ID: 29317370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Leveraging the Recent Advancements in GelMA Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: An Assessment of Challenges and Opportunities.
Mamidi N; Ijadi F; Norahan MH
Biomacromolecules; 2024 Apr; 25(4):2075-2113. PubMed ID: 37406611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Porosity on the Colonization of Digital Light-Processed 3D Hydrogel Constructs toward the Development of a Functional Intestinal Model.
Szabó A; De Vlieghere E; Costa PF; Geurs I; Dewettinck K; Maes L; Laukens D; Van Vlierberghe S
Biomacromolecules; 2024 May; 25(5):2863-2874. PubMed ID: 38564884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Decoupling the effects of stiffness and fiber density on cellular behaviors via an interpenetrating network of gelatin-methacrylate and collagen.
Berger AJ; Linsmeier KM; Kreeger PK; Masters KS
Biomaterials; 2017 Oct; 141():125-135. PubMed ID: 28683337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fibre-infused gel scaffolds guide cardiomyocyte alignment in 3D-printed ventricles.
Choi S; Lee KY; Kim SL; MacQueen LA; Chang H; Zimmerman JF; Jin Q; Peters MM; Ardoña HAM; Liu X; Heiler AC; Gabardi R; Richardson C; Pu WT; Bausch AR; Parker KK
Nat Mater; 2023 Aug; 22(8):1039-1046. PubMed ID: 37500957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrating Melt Electrowriting and Fused Deposition Modeling to Fabricate Hybrid Scaffolds Supportive of Accelerated Bone Regeneration.
Eichholz KF; Pitacco P; Burdis R; Chariyev-Prinz F; Barceló X; Tornifoglio B; Paetzold R; Garcia O; Kelly DJ
Adv Healthc Mater; 2024 Jan; 13(3):e2302057. PubMed ID: 37933556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fabrication of Bioactive Inverted Colloidal Crystal Scaffolds Using Expanded Polystyrene Beads.
Carpenter R; Macres D; Kwak JG; Daniel K; Lee J
Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2020 Mar; 26(3):143-155. PubMed ID: 32031058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrofluidic control of bioactive molecule delivery into soft tissue models based on gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels using threads and surgical sutures.
Cabot JM; Daikuara LY; Yue Z; Hayes P; Liu X; Wallace GG; Paull B
Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):7120. PubMed ID: 32345999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A bioprosthetic ovary created using 3D printed microporous scaffolds restores ovarian function in sterilized mice.
Laronda MM; Rutz AL; Xiao S; Whelan KA; Duncan FE; Roth EW; Woodruff TK; Shah RN
Nat Commun; 2017 May; 8():15261. PubMed ID: 28509899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D Printed Magneto-Active Microfiber Scaffolds for Remote Stimulation and Guided Organization of 3D In Vitro Skeletal Muscle Models.
Cedillo-Servin G; Dahri O; Meneses J; van Duijn J; Moon H; Sage F; Silva J; Pereira A; Magalhães FD; Malda J; Geijsen N; Pinto AM; Castilho M
Small; 2024 Mar; 20(12):e2307178. PubMed ID: 37950402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
