These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32996568)
1. Impact of histology classification on pathologic treatment response and overall survival in distal esophageal cancer patients: a propensity matched analysis. Saeed SM; Naffouje S; Mehta R; Hoffe SE; Fontaine JP; Lauwers GY; Shah P; Frakes J; Pimiento JM Dis Esophagus; 2021 Aug; 34(8):. PubMed ID: 32996568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survival Comparison Between Open and Thoracoscopic Upfront Esophagectomy in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Wang BY; Lin CH; Wu SC; Chen HS Ann Surg; 2023 Jan; 277(1):e53-e60. PubMed ID: 34117148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgery to the primary tumor is associated with improved survival of patients with metastatic esophageal cancer: propensity score-matched analyses of a large retrospective cohort. Zhang R; Zou J; Li P; Li Q; Qiao Y; Han J; Huang K; Ruan P; Lin H; Song Q; Fu Z Dis Esophagus; 2020 Mar; 33(3):. PubMed ID: 31175353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Thoracic Duct Resection During Esophagectomy Does Not Contribute to Improved Prognosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched-Cohort Study. Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Miura S; Goto H; Otsubo D; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Fujino Y; Tominaga M; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 26(12):4053-4061. PubMed ID: 31313045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short- and long-term outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with obstructive ventilatory disorder: a propensity score-matched study. Goto H; Oshikiri T; Kato T; Sawada R; Harada H; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Kakeji Y Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):8834-8842. PubMed ID: 35546208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimal invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant treatments. Chen D; Wang W; Mo J; Ren Q; Miao H; Chen Y; Wen Z BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):145. PubMed ID: 33563244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for squamous cell esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study. Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Hua R; Yang Y; He Y; Ye B; Guo X; Sun Y; Li Z Dis Esophagus; 2020 Jun; 33(6):. PubMed ID: 31608939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinicopathological, metastatic and prognostic features of stage IV esophageal adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma: a SEER database analysis. Pan L; Zhang Y; Gao Y; Qiu J Chin Clin Oncol; 2024 Feb; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 38372056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nomograms to predict survival rates for esophageal cancer patients with malignant behaviors based on ICD-0-3. Sun Y; Wang J; Li Y; Pan S; Yang T; Sun X; Wang Y; Shi X; Zhao X; Zhang X Future Oncol; 2019 Jan; 15(2):121-132. PubMed ID: 30232909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The survival impact of postoperative complications after curative resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: propensity score-matching analysis. Yamamoto M; Shimokawa M; Yoshida D; Yamaguchi S; Ohta M; Egashira A; Ikebe M; Morita M; Toh Y J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 146(5):1351-1360. PubMed ID: 32185488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Propensity score-matched comparison between open and minimal invasive hybrid esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Hölscher AH; DeMeester TR; Schmidt H; Berlth F; Bollschweiler E Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2020 Jun; 405(4):521-532. PubMed ID: 32388717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of geriatric nutritional risk index on surgical outcomes after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Kubo N; Sakurai K; Tamura T; Toyokawa T; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Yashiro M; Ohira M Esophagus; 2019 Apr; 16(2):147-154. PubMed ID: 30311102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Esophageal Adenocarcinomas Reveals Similarities and Differences. Wang K; Johnson A; Ali SM; Klempner SJ; Bekaii-Saab T; Vacirca JL; Khaira D; Yelensky R; Chmielecki J; Elvin JA; Lipson D; Miller VA; Stephens PJ; Ross JS Oncologist; 2015 Oct; 20(10):1132-9. PubMed ID: 26336083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemoradiation for stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single institution experience. Chen Y; Hao D; Wu X; Xing W; Yang Y; He C; Wang W; Liu J; Wang J Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jul; 30(7):1-7. PubMed ID: 28475725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery with or without chemotherapy for patients with clinical stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Matsuda S; Tsubosa Y; Sato H; Takebayashi K; Kawamorita K; Mori K; Niihara M; Tsushima T; Yokota T; Onozawa Y; Yasui H; Takeuchi H; Kitagawa Y Dis Esophagus; 2017 Feb; 30(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 26919154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Propensity-Matched Analysis Comparing Survival After Hybrid Thoracoscopic-Laparotomy Esophagectomy and Complete Thoracoscopic-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy. Li KK; Wang YJ; Liu XH; Wang RW; Jiang YG; Guo W World J Surg; 2019 Mar; 43(3):853-861. PubMed ID: 30386913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neoadjuvant treatment response in negative nodes is an important prognosticator after esophagectomy. Nieman DR; Peyre CG; Watson TJ; Cao W; Lunt MD; Lada MJ; Han MS; Jones CE; Peters JH Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 99(1):277-83. PubMed ID: 25442991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The long-term impact of tumor burden in pT3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis. Li T; Fu X; Xiao L; Su L; Dai Y; Yao Q; Li J Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Oct; 98(42):e17637. PubMed ID: 31626150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Metabolic risk factors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: a prospective study of 580,000 subjects within the Me-Can project. Lindkvist B; Johansen D; Stocks T; Concin H; Bjørge T; Almquist M; Häggström C; Engeland A; Hallmans G; Nagel G; Jonsson H; Selmer R; Ulmer H; Tretli S; Stattin P; Manjer J BMC Cancer; 2014 Feb; 14():103. PubMed ID: 24548688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]