BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32996722)

  • 1. Comparative study of motor cortical excitability changes following anodal tDCS or high-frequency tRNS in relation to stimulation duration.
    Haeckert J; Lasser C; Pross B; Hasan A; Strube W
    Physiol Rep; 2020 Oct; 8(19):e14595. PubMed ID: 32996722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.
    Laczó B; Antal A; Rothkegel H; Paulus W
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 24576783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bidirectional variability in motor cortex excitability modulation following 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants.
    Strube W; Bunse T; Nitsche MA; Nikolaeva A; Palm U; Padberg F; Falkai P; Hasan A
    Physiol Rep; 2016 Aug; 4(15):. PubMed ID: 27495298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring parameters of gamma transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and full-spectrum transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on human pharyngeal cortical excitability.
    Zhang M; Cheng I; Sasegbon A; Dou Z; Hamdy S
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 Sep; 33(9):e14173. PubMed ID: 34081376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation over the cerebellum differentially affect the cerebellum and primary motor cortex pathway.
    Kawakami S; Inukai Y; Ikarashi H; Watanabe H; Miyaguchi S; Otsuru N; Onishi H
    J Clin Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 100():59-65. PubMed ID: 35421743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Jamil A; Batsikadze G; Kuo HI; Labruna L; Hasan A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
    J Physiol; 2017 Feb; 595(4):1273-1288. PubMed ID: 27723104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortical excitability.
    Ho KA; Taylor JL; Loo CK
    J ECT; 2015 Mar; 31(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 25010032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transcranial random noise stimulation is more effective than transcranial direct current stimulation for enhancing working memory in healthy individuals: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.
    Murphy OW; Hoy KE; Wong D; Bailey NW; Fitzgerald PB; Segrave RA
    Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(5):1370-1380. PubMed ID: 32659482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expanding the parameter space of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex.
    Agboada D; Mosayebi Samani M; Jamil A; Kuo MF; Nitsche MA
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):18185. PubMed ID: 31796827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transcranial direct-current stimulation combined with attention increases cortical excitability and improves motor learning in healthy volunteers.
    Yamaguchi T; Moriya K; Tanabe S; Kondo K; Otaka Y; Tanaka S
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Feb; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 32075667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.
    Tremblay S; Larochelle-Brunet F; Lafleur LP; El Mouderrib S; Lepage JF; Théoret H
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analgesia induced by anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS over the motor cortex: Immediate and sustained effects on pain perception.
    Yao J; Li X; Zhang W; Lin X; Lyu X; Lou W; Peng W
    Brain Stimul; 2021; 14(5):1174-1183. PubMed ID: 34371209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The association of motor imagery and kinesthetic illusion prolongs the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal tract excitability.
    Kaneko F; Shibata E; Hayami T; Nagahata K; Aoyama T
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 13():36. PubMed ID: 27079199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Three Non-Invasive Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Methods for Increasing Cortical Excitability.
    Inukai Y; Saito K; Sasaki R; Tsuiki S; Miyaguchi S; Kojima S; Masaki M; Otsuru N; Onishi H
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():668. PubMed ID: 28082887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS): a wide range of frequencies is needed for increasing cortical excitability.
    Moret B; Donato R; Nucci M; Cona G; Campana G
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):15150. PubMed ID: 31641235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans.
    Groppa S; Bergmann TO; Siems C; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR
    Neuroscience; 2010 Apr; 166(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 20083166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-related differences of motor cortex plasticity in adults: A transcranial direct current stimulation study.
    Ghasemian-Shirvan E; Farnad L; Mosayebi-Samani M; Verstraelen S; Meesen RLJ; Kuo MF; Nitsche MA
    Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(6):1588-1599. PubMed ID: 32949779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corticospinal excitability enhancement with simultaneous transcranial near-infrared stimulation and anodal direct current stimulation of motor cortex.
    Song P; Li S; Hao W; Wei M; Liu J; Lin H; Hu S; Dai X; Wang J; Wang R; Wang Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2021 May; 132(5):1018-1024. PubMed ID: 33743296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of transcranial electrical stimulation regimens for effects on inhibitory circuit activity in primary somatosensory cortex and tactile spatial discrimination performance.
    Saito K; Otsuru N; Inukai Y; Miyaguchi S; Yokota H; Kojima S; Sasaki R; Onishi H
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 375():112168. PubMed ID: 31442547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.