These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32997696)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary HPV testing for unvaccinated women in Sweden.
    Fogelberg S; Clements MS; Pedersen K; Sy S; Sparén P; Kim JJ; Burger EA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239611. PubMed ID: 32997696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus testing in Norway.
    Burger EA; Ortendahl JD; Sy S; Kristiansen IS; Kim JJ
    Br J Cancer; 2012 Apr; 106(9):1571-8. PubMed ID: 22441643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Projected cost-effectiveness of repeat high-risk human papillomavirus testing using self-collected vaginal samples in the Swedish cervical cancer screening program.
    Östensson E; Hellström AC; Hellman K; Gustavsson I; Gyllensten U; Wilander E; Zethraeus N; Andersson S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Jul; 92(7):830-40. PubMed ID: 23530870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximizing the cost-effectiveness of cervical screening in the context of routine HPV vaccination by optimizing screening strategies with respect to vaccine uptake: a modeling analysis.
    Choi HCW; Leung K; Chan KKL; Bai Y; Jit M; Wu JT
    BMC Med; 2023 Feb; 21(1):48. PubMed ID: 36765349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus DNA testing and HPV-16,18 vaccination.
    Goldhaber-Fiebert JD; Stout NK; Salomon JA; Kuntz KM; Goldie SJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):308-20. PubMed ID: 18314477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Vaccinated Against Human Papillomavirus.
    Kim JJ; Burger EA; Sy S; Campos NG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Feb; 109(2):. PubMed ID: 27754955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Health technology assessment report: HPV DNA based primary screening for cervical cancer precursors].
    Ronco G; Biggeri A; Confortini M; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Accetta G; Giordano L; Cogo C; Carozzi F; Gillio Tos A; Arbyn M; Mejier CJ; Snijders PJ; Cuzick J; Giorgi Rossi P
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(3-4 Suppl 1):e1-72. PubMed ID: 22828243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program.
    Lew JB; Simms KT; Smith MA; Hall M; Kang YJ; Xu XM; Caruana M; Velentzis LS; Bessell T; Saville M; Hammond I; Canfell K
    Lancet Public Health; 2017 Feb; 2(2):e96-e107. PubMed ID: 29253402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-Effectiveness of Primary HPV Testing, Cytology and Co-testing as Cervical Cancer Screening for Women Above Age 30 Years.
    Jin XW; Lipold L; Foucher J; Sikon A; Brainard J; Belinson J; Schramm S; Nottingham K; Hu B; Rothberg MB
    J Gen Intern Med; 2016 Nov; 31(11):1338-1344. PubMed ID: 27418345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Switching clinic-based cervical cancer screening programs to human papillomavirus self-sampling: A cost-effectiveness analysis of vaccinated and unvaccinated Norwegian women.
    Pedersen K; Portnoy A; Sy S; Hansen BT; Tropé A; Kim JJ; Burger EA
    Int J Cancer; 2022 Feb; 150(3):491-501. PubMed ID: 34664271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adapting cervical cancer screening for women vaccinated against human papillomavirus infections: The value of stratifying guidelines.
    Pedersen K; Burger EA; Nygård M; Kristiansen IS; Kim JJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Mar; 91():68-75. PubMed ID: 29335156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost effectiveness analysis of HPV primary screening and dual stain cytology triage compared with cervical cytology.
    Termrungruanglert W; Khemapech N; Tantitamit T; Havanond P
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 30(2):e17. PubMed ID: 30740950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision-analytic modeling to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HPV-DNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening in Germany.
    Sroczynski G; Schnell-Inderst P; Mühlberger N; Lang K; Aidelsburger P; Wasem J; Mittendorf T; Engel J; Hillemanns P; Petry KU; Krämer A; Siebert U
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2010 Apr; 6():Doc05. PubMed ID: 21289878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
    Berkhof J; Bogaards JA; Demirel E; Diaz M; Sharma M; Kim JJ
    Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31 Suppl 7():H71-9. PubMed ID: 24332299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in women aged 30 years or more.
    Goldie SJ; Kim JJ; Wright TC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 103(4):619-31. PubMed ID: 15051550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economic evaluation of HPV DNA test as primary screening method for cervical cancer: A health policy discussion in Greece.
    Skroumpelos A; Agorastos T; Constantinidis T; Chatzistamatiou K; Kyriopoulos J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226335. PubMed ID: 31830114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Community-based HPV self-collection versus visual inspection with acetic acid in Uganda: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the ASPIRE trial.
    Mezei AK; Pedersen HN; Sy S; Regan C; Mitchell-Foster SM; Byamugisha J; Sekikubo M; Armstrong H; Rawat A; Singer J; Ogilvie GS; Kim JJ; Campos NG
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jun; 8(6):e020484. PubMed ID: 29895648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protocol for Compass: a randomised controlled trial of primary HPV testing versus cytology screening for cervical cancer in HPV-unvaccinated and vaccinated women aged 25-69 years living in Australia.
    Canfell K; Saville M; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Brotherton J; Heley S; Castle PE
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e016700. PubMed ID: 29374658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.