These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32997740)

  • 1. Interfacial Evaluation of CAD/CAM Resin Inlays on the Cavity Floor Using Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Han SH; Shimada Y; Sadr A; Tagami J; Yang SE
    Oper Dent; 2020 Nov; 45(6):664-676. PubMed ID: 32997740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Pretreatment and Activation Mode on the Interfacial Adaptation of Nanoceramic Resin Inlay and Self-adhesive Resin Cement.
    Han SH; Shimada Y; Sadr A; Tagami J; Kum KY; Park SH
    Dent Mater; 2020 Sep; 36(9):1170-1182. PubMed ID: 32536587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Material Thickness and Pretreatment on the Interfacial Gap of Translucent Zirconia Restorations with Self-adhesive Resin Cement.
    Han SH; Shimada Y; Sadr A; Tagami J; Tabata T; Nakagawa H; Yang SE
    Oper Dent; 2022 Sep; 47(5):535-548. PubMed ID: 36223319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regional bond strength to lateral walls in class I and II ceramic inlays luted with four resin cements and glass-ionomer luting agent.
    Manso AG; González-Lopez S; Bolaños-Carmona V; Maurício PJ; Félix SA; Carvalho PA
    J Adhes Dent; 2011 Oct; 13(5):455-65. PubMed ID: 21246071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of ultrasound application on inlays luting with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Cantoro A; Goracci C; Coniglio I; Magni E; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):617-23. PubMed ID: 20694567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pressable feldspathic inlays in premolars: effect of cementation strategy and mechanical cycling on the adhesive bond between dentin and restoration.
    Feitosa SA; Corazza PH; Cesar PF; Bottino MA; Valandro LF
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Apr; 16(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 24027771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Attenuated Light Through Translucent Zirconia on the Interfacial Adaptation and Polymerization of Resin Cements.
    Han SH; Shimada Y; Sadr A; Tabata T; Nakagawa H; Sato T; Byun JE; Park SH
    J Adhes Dent; 2023 Nov; 25():219-230. PubMed ID: 37910068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of different curing approaches on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays.
    Rechenberg DK; Göhring TN; Attin T
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Jun; 12(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 20157661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of Cavity Pretreatments on the Fracture Resistance of Premolars with Self-adhesive Cemented Composite Inlay.
    Shafiei F; Jowkar Z; Hosseini N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul; 20(7):828-833. PubMed ID: 31597803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physical properties of dual-cured luting-agents correlated to early no interfacial-gap incidence with composite inlay restorations.
    Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 20334906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adhesion of indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements.
    Inukai T; Abe T; Ito Y; Pilecki P; Wilson RF; Watson TF; Foxton RM
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):474-84. PubMed ID: 22360367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
    Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of cement-curing modes on dentin bonding of inlays.
    Zuellig-Singer R; Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Dent Res; 1992 Nov; 71(11):1842-6. PubMed ID: 1401449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of oxalate desensitizer with different resin cement-retained indirect composite inlays on fracture resistance of teeth.
    Shafiei F; Alavi AA; Karimi F; Ansarifard E
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 23279061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of different luting protocols on shear bond strength of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing resin nanoceramic material to dentin.
    Poggio C; Pigozzo M; Ceci M; Scribante A; Beltrami R; Chiesa M
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2016; 13(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 27076822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The clinical performance of CAD/CAM-generated composite inlays.
    Fasbinder DJ; Dennison JB; Heys DR; Lampe K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Dec; 136(12):1714-23. PubMed ID: 16383055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro.
    Frankenberger R; Hehn J; Hajtó J; Krämer N; Naumann M; Koch A; Roggendorf MJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 22358378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.