122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32998132)
1. Is There Any Correlation between Spread of Excitation Width and the Refractory Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Cochlear Implant Users?
Coutinho da Silva J; Schmidt Goffi-Gomez MV; Tsuji RK; Bento R; Brito Neto R
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 32998132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the spread of excitation width correlated to the speech recognition in cochlear implant users?
da Silva JC; Goffi-Gomez MVS; Magalhães AT; Tsuji RK; Bento RF
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jun; 278(6):1815-1820. PubMed ID: 32767167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is the spread of excitation different between adults and children cochlear implants users?
Goffi-Gomez MVS; Corrêa FMDS; Magalhães AT; Hoshino AC; Samuel P; Sadowski T; Colalto C; Tsuji RK; Brito Neto R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3491-3498. PubMed ID: 38240771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the pre- or postlingual status of cochlear implant recipients on behavioural T/C-levels.
Zarowski A; Molisz A; De Coninck L; Vermeiren A; Theunen T; Theuwis L; Przewoźny T; Siebert J; Offeciers FE
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109867. PubMed ID: 31999994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Refractory recovery function of electrical auditory on the survival auditory nerve in cochlear implant recipients].
Xi X; Ji F; Han DY; Huang DL; Hong MD; Yang WY
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 15195587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The current tendencies and prospects of the neural response telemetry in the rehabilitation of the patients after cochlear implantation].
Bakhshinian VV
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2014; (2):21-5. PubMed ID: 24781166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.
He S; Shahsavarani BS; McFayden TC; Wang H; Gill KE; Xu L; Chao X; Luo J; Wang R; He N
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):238-250. PubMed ID: 28678078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraoperative transimpedance and spread of excitation profile correlations with a lateral-wall cochlear implant electrode array.
Söderqvist S; Lamminmäki S; Aarnisalo A; Hirvonen T; Sinkkonen ST; Sivonen V
Hear Res; 2021 Jun; 405():108235. PubMed ID: 33901994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does pediatric cochlear implant insertion technique affect intraoperative neural response telemetry thresholds?
Poley M; Overmyer E; Craun P; Holcomb M; Reilly B; White D; Preciado D
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1404-7. PubMed ID: 26166451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association Between Intracochlear Electrode Design and Electrically-Evoked Compound Action Potential Measures in Cochlear Implant Users.
Kim JS; Hong SH; Moon IJ
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38774957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ECAP, ESR and subjective levels for two different nucleus 24 electrode arrays.
Polak M; Hodges A; Balkany T
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Jul; 26(4):639-45. PubMed ID: 16015160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of parameter manipulations on spread of excitation measured with electrically-evoked compound action potentials.
van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):465-74. PubMed ID: 22315988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
Abbas PJ; Tejani VD; Scheperle RA; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):409-425. PubMed ID: 28085738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural recovery function of the auditory nerve in cochlear implant surgery: Comparison between different regions of the cochlea.
Carvalho B; Richter Minhoto Wiemes G; Richter Minhoto Wiemes N; Hamerschmidt R
Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Jul; 23(4):232-240. PubMed ID: 35337245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays.
Hughes ML; Abbas PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1538-47. PubMed ID: 16583899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.
Kim JS; Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():304-315. PubMed ID: 30393003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward a method of achieving balanced stimulation of bilateral auditory nerves: Evidence from children receiving matched and unmatched bilateral cochlear implants simultaneously.
Tsai P; Wisener N; Papsin BC; Cushing SL; Gordon KA
Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108445. PubMed ID: 35104716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cochlear implant: correlation of nerve function recovery, auditory deprivation and etiology.
Kutscher K; Goffi-Gomez MV; Befi-Lopes DM; Tsuji RK; Bento RF
Pro Fono; 2010; 22(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 21271102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
