These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32998158)

  • 1. Diagnosing fraudulent baseline data in clinical trials.
    Proschan MA; Shaw PA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239121. PubMed ID: 32998158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
    Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
    Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for non-random sampling in randomised, controlled trials by Yuhji Saitoh.
    Carlisle JB; Loadsman JA
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Jan; 72(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 27988952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Presence of 'spin' in the abstracts and titles of anaesthesiology randomised controlled trials.
    Kinder NC; Weaver MD; Wayant C; Vassar M
    Br J Anaesth; 2019 Jan; 122(1):e13-e14. PubMed ID: 30579417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled trial is statistically inefficient: a simulation study.
    Vickers AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2001; 1():6. PubMed ID: 11459516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized trials for the real world: making as few and as reasonable assumptions as possible.
    Baker SG; Kramer BS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Jun; 17(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 17925312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adding experimental arms to platform clinical trials: randomization procedures and interim analyses.
    Ventz S; Cellamare M; Parmigiani G; Trippa L
    Biostatistics; 2018 Apr; 19(2):199-215. PubMed ID: 29036330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fraudulent statistical methods.
    Schneiderman MA
    Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1624-8. PubMed ID: 1786336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 80% of China's clinical trial data are fraudulent, investigation finds.
    Woodhead M
    BMJ; 2016 Oct; 355():i5396. PubMed ID: 27707716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survival distributions impact the power of randomized placebo-phase design and parallel groups randomized clinical trials.
    Abrahamyan L; Li CS; Beyene J; Willan AR; Feldman BM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Mar; 64(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 20926258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials.
    Al-Marzouki S; Evans S; Marshall T; Roberts I
    BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7511):267-70. PubMed ID: 16052019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018.
    Dal-Ré R; Ayuso C
    J Med Genet; 2019 Nov; 56(11):734-740. PubMed ID: 31300549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On model selections for repeated measurement data in clinical studies.
    Zou B; Jin B; Koch GG; Zhou H; Borst SE; Menon S; Shuster JJ
    Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(10):1621-33. PubMed ID: 25645442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity.
    Fujii Y
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):669-70; author reply 670. PubMed ID: 22512837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Jones R
    Fam Pract; 2004 Feb; 21(1):3. PubMed ID: 14760035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiplicity in oncology randomised controlled trials: a threat to medical evidence?
    Prasad V; Booth CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1638-1640. PubMed ID: 31797779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Baseline P value distributions in randomized trials were uniform for continuous but not categorical variables.
    Bolland MJ; Gamble GD; Avenell A; Grey A; Lumley T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Aug; 112():67-76. PubMed ID: 31125614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sympathetic bias.
    Levy DM; Peart SJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Jun; 17(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 17925315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choosing covariates in the analysis of clinical trials.
    Beach ML; Meier P
    Control Clin Trials; 1989 Dec; 10(4 Suppl):161S-175S. PubMed ID: 2605965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of data integrity.
    McCann JC; Hudes ML; Ames BN
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Sep; 67(9):1042-3. PubMed ID: 22861504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.