These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32998252)

  • 1. Driving Performance and Technology Acceptance Evaluation in Real Traffic of a Smartphone-Based Driver Assistance System.
    Voinea GD; Postelnicu CC; Duguleana M; Mogan GL; Socianu R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(19):. PubMed ID: 32998252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems.
    Rahman MM; Lesch MF; Horrey WJ; Strawderman L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():361-373. PubMed ID: 28957759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driver's behavioral adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): the case of speed and time headway.
    Bianchi Piccinini GF; Rodrigues CM; Leitão M; Simões A
    J Safety Res; 2014 Jun; 49():77-84. PubMed ID: 24913490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advanced driver assistance systems for teen drivers: Teen and parent impressions, perceived need, and intervention preferences.
    Weiss E; Fisher Thiel M; Sultana N; Hannan C; Seacrist T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S120-S124. PubMed ID: 29584476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advanced driver assistance systems for teen drivers: A national survey of teen and parent perceptions.
    Hannan C; Palumbo AJ; Fisher Thiel MC; Weiss E; Seacrist T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S84-S90. PubMed ID: 30335514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing driver acceptance of technology that reduces mobile phone use while driving: The case of mobile phone applications.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Briant O; Kaye SA; King M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Feb; 135():105348. PubMed ID: 31790969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gaze and Eye Tracking: Techniques and Applications in ADAS.
    Khan MQ; Lee S
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 31847432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Willingness to use mobile application for smartphone for improving road safety.
    Cardamone AS; Eboli L; Forciniti C; Mazzulla G
    Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2016; 23(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 25105220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Road traffic accidents and self-reported Portuguese car driver's attitudes, behaviors, and opinions: Are they related?
    Bon de Sousa T; Santos C; Mateus C; Areal A; Trigoso J; Nunes C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Oct; 17(7):705-11. PubMed ID: 26889832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using naturalistic driving films as a design tool for investigating driver requirements in HMI design for ADAS.
    Wang M; Sun D; Chen F
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():5045-52. PubMed ID: 22317502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of major-road vehicle speed and driver age and gender on left-turn gap acceptance.
    Yan X; Radwan E; Guo D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Jul; 39(4):843-52. PubMed ID: 17239808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of Driver's Danger Level when Accessing the Center Console for Safe Driving.
    Lee HS; Oh S; Jo D; Kang BY
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Oct; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 30309040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating advanced driver-assistance system trainings using driver performance, attention allocation, and neural efficiency measures.
    Zahabi M; Abdul Razak AM; Shortz AE; Mehta RK; Manser M
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Apr; 84():103036. PubMed ID: 31987518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106238. PubMed ID: 34182321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Personalizing driver safety interfaces via driver cognitive factors inference.
    Sumner ES; DeCastro J; Costa J; Gopinath DE; Kimani E; Hakimi S; Morgan A; Best A; Nguyen H; Brooks DJ; Ul Haq B; Patrikalakis A; Yasuda H; Sieck K; Balachandran A; Chen TL; Rosman G
    Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):18058. PubMed ID: 39103366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaction driver-bicyclist on rural roads: Effects of cross-sections and road geometric elements.
    Bella F; Silvestri M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():191-201. PubMed ID: 28319757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal analysis of driving efficiency using smartphone data.
    Tselentis DI; Vlahogianni EI; Yannis G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 May; 154():106081. PubMed ID: 33714844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Driver Drowsiness Multi-Method Detection for Vehicles with Autonomous Driving Functions.
    Beles H; Vesselenyi T; Rus A; Mitran T; Scurt FB; Tolea BA
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Feb; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 38475079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of Driver's Intention of Lane Change by Augmenting Sensor Information Using Machine Learning Techniques.
    Kim IH; Bong JH; Park J; Park S
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jun; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 28604582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survey of Cooperative Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: From a Holistic and Systemic Vision.
    González-Saavedra JF; Figueroa M; Céspedes S; Montejo-Sánchez S
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 35459025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.