These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32998577)

  • 1. Durability of Digital Flexible Ureteroscope in University Hospital and Ambulatory Surgical Center: Is It Time to Rethink?
    Banerjee I; Katz JE; Bhattu AS; Soodana NP; Deane LA; Marcovich R; Shah HN
    J Endourol; 2021 Mar; 35(3):289-295. PubMed ID: 32998577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Durability of Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Prospective Evaluation of Longevity, the Factors that Affect it, and Damage Mechanisms.
    Legemate JD; Kamphuis GM; Freund JE; Baard J; Zanetti SP; Catellani M; Oussoren HW; de la Rosette JJ
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Nov; 5(6):1105-1111. PubMed ID: 29534873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Economic Implications of a Reusable Flexible Digital Ureteroscope: A Cost-Benefit Analysis.
    Martin CJ; McAdams SB; Abdul-Muhsin H; Lim VM; Nunez-Nateras R; Tyson MD; Humphreys MR
    J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):730-735. PubMed ID: 27693449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
    Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
    BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis.
    Mille E; El-Khoury E; Haddad M; Pinol J; Charbonnier M; Gastaldi P; Dariel A; Merrot T; Faure A
    J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Jun; 19(3):248.e1-248.e6. PubMed ID: 36746718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
    Dale J; Kaplan AG; Radvak D; Shin R; Ackerman A; Chen T; Scales CD; Ferrandino MN; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 27981862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary care center with multiple surgeons.
    Carey RI; Martin CJ; Knego JR
    Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 24837456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective comparative study between the effect of CIDEX
    Al Qahtani SH; Abdelhamied MH; AlMuhrij AH; Al Rawashada MY; Al Askar AM; Abdelhamid AM; Fath El-Bab TK; Galal EM; Eladawy MS
    World J Urol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):775-781. PubMed ID: 31087123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved durability of flex-Xc digital flexible ureteroscope: how long can you expect it to last?
    Multescu R; Geavlete B; Georgescu D; Geavlete P
    Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 24703462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center.
    Carey RI; Gomez CS; Maurici G; Lynne CM; Leveillee RJ; Bird VG
    J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):607-10; discussion 610. PubMed ID: 16813899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the durability of digital flexible ureteroscopes.
    Karaolides T; Bach C; Kachrilas S; Goyal A; Masood J; Buchholz N
    Urology; 2013 Apr; 81(4):717-22. PubMed ID: 23465156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage.
    Sung JC; Springhart WP; Marguet CG; L'Esperance JO; Tan YH; Albala DM; Preminger GM
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):958-63. PubMed ID: 16286103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice.
    Kramolowsky E; McDowell Z; Moore B; Booth B; Wood N
    J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 26542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
    Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
    J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the mechanisms of damage to flexible ureteroscopes and suggestions for ureteroscope preservation.
    Sooriakumaran P; Kaba R; Andrews HO; Buchholz NP
    Asian J Androl; 2005 Dec; 7(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 16281093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of a single-use, digital flexible ureteroscope with a reusable, fiberoptic ureteroscope for management of patients with urolithiasis.
    Mourmouris P; Tzelves L; Raptidis G; Berdempes M; Markopoulos T; Dellis G; Siafakas I; Skolarikos A
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2021 Oct; 93(3):326-329. PubMed ID: 34839639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breakage Costs in Flexible Ureteroscopy: Digital vs. Fiberoptic Modalities.
    Ito WE; Igel DA; Whiles BB; Sardiu M; Neff DA; Duchene DA; Molina WR
    Urology; 2023 Mar; 173():68-74. PubMed ID: 36400269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Steep Infundibulopelvic Angle as a New Risk Factor for Flexible Ureteroscope Damage and Complicated Postoperative Course.
    Ozimek T; Cordes J; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Gilbert N; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
    J Endourol; 2018 Jul; 32(7):597-602. PubMed ID: 29737199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.
    Proietti S; Dragos L; Molina W; Doizi S; Giusti G; Traxer O
    J Endourol; 2016 Jun; 30(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 27084572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective evaluation of flexible ureteroscopes with a novel evaluation tool.
    Bell JR; Penniston KL; Best SL; Nakada SY
    Can J Urol; 2017 Oct; 24(5):9004-9010. PubMed ID: 28971788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.