These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32998945)

  • 1. Validity Coefficient of Repeated Measurements of Urinary Marker of Sugar Intake Is Comparable to Urinary Nitrogen as Marker of Protein Intake in Free-living Subjects.
    Abreu TC; Hulshof PJM; Boshuizen HC; Trijsburg L; Gray N; de Vries JHM
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2021 Jan; 30(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 32998945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Urinary sucrose and fructose to validate self-reported sugar intake in children and adolescents: results from the I.Family study.
    Intemann T; Pigeot I; De Henauw S; Eiben G; Lissner L; Krogh V; Dereń K; Molnár D; Moreno LA; Russo P; Siani A; Sirangelo I; Tornaritis M; Veidebaum T; Pala V;
    Eur J Nutr; 2019 Apr; 58(3):1247-1258. PubMed ID: 29511828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of duplicate portion and 24 h recall as reference methods for validating a FFQ using urinary markers as the estimate of true intake.
    Trijsburg L; de Vries JH; Boshuizen HC; Hulshof PJ; Hollman PC; van 't Veer P; Geelen A
    Br J Nutr; 2015 Oct; 114(8):1304-12. PubMed ID: 26314241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative validity of habitual sugar and low/no-calorie sweetener consumption assessed by food frequency questionnaire, multiple 24-h dietary recalls and urinary biomarkers: an observational study within the SWEET project.
    Buso ME; Boshuizen HC; Naomi ND; Maho W; Diepeveen-de Bruin M; Balvers MG; de Vries JH; Harrold JA; Halford JC; Raben A; Feskens EJ; Brouwer-Brolsma EM
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2024 Feb; 119(2):546-559. PubMed ID: 38043866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing Self-Reported Sugar Intake With the Sucrose and Fructose Biomarker From Overnight Urine Samples in Relation to Cardiometabolic Risk Factors.
    Ramne S; Gray N; Hellstrand S; Brunkwall L; Enhörning S; Nilsson PM; Engström G; Orho-Melander M; Ericson U; Kuhnle GGC; Sonestedt E
    Front Nutr; 2020; 7():62. PubMed ID: 32435652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Urinary Excretion of Sodium, Nitrogen, and Sugar Amounts Are Valid Biomarkers of Dietary Sodium, Protein, and High Sugar Intake in Nonobese Adolescents.
    Moore LB; Liu SV; Halliday TM; Neilson AP; Hedrick VE; Davy BM
    J Nutr; 2017 Dec; 147(12):2364-2373. PubMed ID: 28931586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison and validation of 2 analytical methods for measurement of urinary sucrose and fructose excretion.
    Song X; Navarro SL; Diep P; Thomas WK; Razmpoosh EC; Schwarz Y; Wang CY; Kratz M; Neuhouser ML; Lampe JW
    Nutr Res; 2013 Sep; 33(9):696-703. PubMed ID: 24034568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Urinary Sucrose and Fructose From Spot Urine May Be Used as a Predictive Biomarker of Total Sugar Intake-Findings From a Controlled Feeding Study.
    Tasevska N; Palma-Duran SA; Sagi-Kiss V; Commins J; Barrett B; Kipnis V; Midthune D; O'Brien DM; Freedman LS
    J Nutr; 2023 Jun; 153(6):1816-1824. PubMed ID: 37030594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sugars measured enzymatically in a fasting overnight urine sample are not sensitive biomarkers of dietary added sugar intake in postmenopausal women.
    Weinhold KR; Andridge RR; Bomser JA; Sasaki GY; Bruno RS; Orchard TS
    Nutr Health; 2022 Jun; ():2601060221106819. PubMed ID: 35679080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the performance of 24-h urinary sucrose and fructose as a biomarker of total sugars intake in US participants - a controlled feeding study.
    Tasevska N; Sagi-Kiss V; Palma-Duran SA; Barrett B; Chaloux M; Commins J; O'Brien DM; Johnston CS; Midthune D; Kipnis V; Freedman LS
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2021 Aug; 114(2):721-730. PubMed ID: 34036321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of approaches to correct intake–health associations for FFQ measurement error using a duplicate recovery biomarker and a duplicate 24 h dietary recall as reference method.
    Geelen A; Souverein OW; Busstra MC; de Vries JH; van't Veer P
    Public Health Nutr; 2015 Feb; 18(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 24499731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomarker-predicted sugars intake compared with self-reported measures in US Hispanics/Latinos: results from the HCHS/SOL SOLNAS study.
    Beasley JM; Jung M; Tasevska N; Wong WW; Siega-Riz AM; Sotres-Alvarez D; Gellman MD; Kizer JR; Shaw PA; Stamler J; Stoutenberg M; Van Horn L; Franke AA; Wylie-Rosett J; Mossavar-Rahmani Y
    Public Health Nutr; 2016 Dec; 19(18):3256-3264. PubMed ID: 27339078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Urinary sucrose and fructose as biomarkers for sugar consumption.
    Tasevska N; Runswick SA; McTaggart A; Bingham SA
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1287-94. PubMed ID: 15894688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validating fatty acid intake as estimated by an FFQ: how does the 24 h recall perform as reference method compared with the duplicate portion?
    Trijsburg L; de Vries JH; Hollman PC; Hulshof PJ; van 't Veer P; Boshuizen HC; Geelen A
    Public Health Nutr; 2018 Oct; 21(14):2568-2574. PubMed ID: 29734960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of the predictive sugars biomarker to evaluate self-reported total sugars intake in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study.
    Tasevska N; Midthune D; Potischman N; Subar AF; Cross AJ; Bingham SA; Schatzkin A; Kipnis V
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2011 Mar; 20(3):490-500. PubMed ID: 21278329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of a urinary sugars biomarker to assess measurement error in self-reported sugars intake in the nutrition and physical activity assessment study (NPAAS).
    Tasevska N; Midthune D; Tinker LF; Potischman N; Lampe JW; Neuhouser ML; Beasley JM; Van Horn L; Prentice RL; Kipnis V
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Dec; 23(12):2874-83. PubMed ID: 25234237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Twenty-Four-Hour Urinary Sugars Biomarker in a Vending Machine Intake Paradigm in a Diverse Population.
    Ahern MM; Stinson EJ; Votruba SB; Krakoff J; Tasevska N
    Nutrients; 2024 Feb; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 38474737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urinary sugars biomarker relates better to extrinsic than to intrinsic sugars intake in a metabolic study with volunteers consuming their normal diet.
    Tasevska N; Runswick SA; Welch AA; McTaggart A; Bingham SA
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2009 May; 63(5):653-9. PubMed ID: 18301435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. II. Relative validity and reproducibility for nutrients.
    Ocké MC; Bueno-de-Mesquita HB; Pols MA; Smit HA; van Staveren WA; Kromhout D
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997; 26 Suppl 1():S49-58. PubMed ID: 9126533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Urinary excretion of dithiocarbamates and self-reported Cruciferous vegetable intake: application of the 'method of triads' to a food-specific biomarker.
    Fowke JH; Hebert JR; Fahey JW
    Public Health Nutr; 2002 Dec; 5(6):791-9. PubMed ID: 12570887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.