These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32999089)

  • 1. Vascular Closure Devices Attenuate Femoral Access Complications of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Beraldo de Andrade P; de Ribamar Costa J; Rinaldi FS; de Castro Bienert IR; Barbosa RA; Esteves V; Tebet M; Zukowski C; Maia F; Piva E Mattos LA; Labrunie A; Abizaid A; Sousa AR
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 32(10):364-370. PubMed ID: 32999089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial.
    Andrade PB; Mattos LA; Rinaldi FS; Bienert IC; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Tebet M; Esteves V; Abizaid A; Sousa AR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):976-982. PubMed ID: 27514319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Karrowni W; Vyas A; Giacomino B; Schweizer M; Blevins A; Girotra S; Horwitz PA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):814-23. PubMed ID: 23968700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of radial, brachial, and femoral accesses using hemostatic devices for percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Otsuka M; Shiode N; Nakao Y; Ikegami Y; Kobayashi Y; Takeuchi A; Harima A; Higaki T; Oi K; Dai K; Kawase T; Nakama Y; Suenari K; Nishioka K; Sakai K; Shimatani Y; Masaoka Y; Inoue I
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2018 Jan; 33(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 27830459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of radial access versus femoral access with the use of a vascular closure device for the prevention of vascular complications and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Téblick A; Vanderbruggen W; Vandendriessche T; Bosmans J; Haine SEF; Miljoen H; Segers V; Wouters K; Vrints C; Claeys MJ
    Acta Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 73(3):241-247. PubMed ID: 28851255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
    Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography/Intervention in Women With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the RIVAL Trial (Radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention).
    Pandie S; Mehta SR; Cantor WJ; Cheema AN; Gao P; Madan M; Niemela K; Rao SV; Schwalm JD; Valentin V; Velianou JL; Jolly SS
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 25907080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radial vs Femoral Approach in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta- Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    Nardin M; Verdoia M; Barbieri L; Schaffer A; Suryapranata H; De Luca G
    Curr Vasc Pharmacol; 2017; 16(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 28490313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial versus femoral route in patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with warfarin.
    Baker NC; O'Connell EW; Htun WW; Sun H; Green SM; Skelding KA; Blankenship JC; Scott TD; Berger PB
    Am Heart J; 2014 Oct; 168(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 25262264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radial versus femoral vascular access in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Are the results of femoral operators unfairly represented in observational research?
    Blake SR; Shahzad A; Aggarwal SK; Kumar A; Khan A; Stables RH
    Am Heart J; 2019 Apr; 210():81-87. PubMed ID: 30743211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Radial Access, Guided Femoral Access, and Non-Guided Femoral Access Among Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Koshy LM; Aberle LH; Krucoff MW; Hess CN; Mazzaferri E; Jolly SS; Jacobs A; Gibson CM; Mehran R; Gilchrist IC; Rao SV
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jan; 30(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 29035844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radial Versus Femoral Approach in Women Undergoing Coronary Angiography: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Al Halabi S; Burke L; Hussain F; Lopez J; Mathew V; Bernat I; Shroff A
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 31(11):335-340. PubMed ID: 31416045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radial Versus Femoral Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: MACE Outcomes at Long-Term Follow-up.
    Campelo-Parada F; Carrié D; Bartorelli AL; Namiki A; Hovasse T; Kimura T; Serra-Peñaranda A; Varenne O; Lalmand J; Kadota K; Ikari Y; Tobaru T; Fujii K; Nakamura S; Saito S; Wijns W;
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 30(7):262-268. PubMed ID: 29958176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison Between Radial Approach and Femoral Approach With Vascular Closure Devices on the Occurrence of Access-Site Complications and Periprocedural Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Rigattieri S; Sciahbasi A; Ratib K; Alonzo A; Cox N; Chodór P; Berni A; Fedele S; Pugliese FR; Cooper CJ; Louvard Y; Nolan J; Rao SV
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 28(12):473-479. PubMed ID: 27630147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcomes of femoral closure compared to radial compression devices following percutaneous coronary intervention: the FERARI study.
    Fastner C; Behnes M; Ünsal M; El-Battrawy I; Ansari U; Mashayekhi K; Hoffmann U; Lang S; Kuschyk J; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Heart Vessels; 2017 May; 32(5):520-530. PubMed ID: 27803954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial.
    Rao SV; Hess CN; Barham B; Aberle LH; Anstrom KJ; Patel TB; Jorgensen JP; Mazzaferri EL; Jolly SS; Jacobs A; Newby LK; Gibson CM; Kong DF; Mehran R; Waksman R; Gilchrist IC; McCourt BJ; Messenger JC; Peterson ED; Harrington RA; Krucoff MW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):857-67. PubMed ID: 25147030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients.
    de Andrade PB; E Mattos LA; Tebet MA; Rinaldi FS; Esteves VC; Nogueira EF; França JÍ; de Andrade MV; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Abizaid AA; Sousa AG
    Trials; 2013 Dec; 14():435. PubMed ID: 24345099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extravascular compared to Intravascular Femoral Closure is Associated with Less Bleeding and Similar MACE after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Kim SH; Behnes M; Baron S; Shchetynska-Marinova T; Uensal M; Mashayekhi K; Hoffmann U; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Int J Med Sci; 2019; 16(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 30662327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does a vascular closure device affect the imbalance in complications between radial and femoral access?
    Turi ZG
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):855-6. PubMed ID: 27085026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    Ferrante G; Rao SV; Jüni P; Da Costa BR; Reimers B; Condorelli G; Anzuini A; Jolly SS; Bertrand OF; Krucoff MW; Windecker S; Valgimigli M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 9(14):1419-34. PubMed ID: 27372195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.