These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32999323)

  • 1. Contact lenses, the reverse Pulfrich effect, and anti-Pulfrich monovision corrections.
    Rodriguez-Lopez V; Dorronsoro C; Burge J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):16086. PubMed ID: 32999323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Case report of the evidence of a spontaneous Reverse Pulfrich effect in monovision after cataract surgery.
    Rodriguez-Lopez V; Dorronsoro C
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Jun; 23(1):289. PubMed ID: 37353733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monovision and the Misperception of Motion.
    Burge J; Rodriguez-Lopez V; Dorronsoro C
    Curr Biol; 2019 Aug; 29(15):2586-2592.e4. PubMed ID: 31353183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peripheral visual acuity with monovision and other contact lens corrections for presbyopia.
    Collins MJ; Brown B; Verney SJ; Makras M; Bowman KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Jun; 66(6):370-4. PubMed ID: 2771322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Small-aperture monovision and the Pulfrich experience: absence of neural adaptation effects.
    Plainis S; Petratou D; Giannakopoulou T; Radhakrishnan H; Pallikaris IG; Charman WN
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e75987. PubMed ID: 24155881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses.
    Kirschen DG; Hung CC; Nakano TR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 76(12):832-7. PubMed ID: 10612404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ocular dominance and the interocular suppression of blur in monovision.
    Schor C; Landsman L; Erickson P
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Oct; 64(10):723-30. PubMed ID: 3688174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Change in refractive anisometropia in presbyopic adults wearing monovision contact lens correction.
    Wick B; Westin E
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Jan; 76(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 10030613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multifocal versus modified monovision corrections: A non-dispensing comparison of visual assessment in presbyopic neophytes.
    Parekh D; Asokan R; Purkait S; Iqbal A
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 71(5):1837-1842. PubMed ID: 37203039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monovision: a review.
    Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Sep; 27(5):417-39. PubMed ID: 17718882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.
    Situ P; Du Toit R; Fonn D; Simpson T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12861114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of monovision contact lens wear on driving performance.
    Wood JM; Wick K; Shuley V; Pearce B; Evans D
    Clin Exp Optom; 1998; 81(3):100-103. PubMed ID: 12482258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Presbyopia: Effectiveness of correction strategies.
    Wolffsohn JS; Davies LN
    Prog Retin Eye Res; 2019 Jan; 68():124-143. PubMed ID: 30244049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast sensitivity with contact lens corrections for presbyopia.
    Collins MJ; Brown B; Bowman KJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1989 Apr; 9(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 2622648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate cortical adaptation in visual and non-visual areas functions induced by monovision.
    Zeri F; Berchicci M; Naroo SA; Pitzalis S; Di Russo F
    J Physiol; 2018 Jan; 596(2):253-266. PubMed ID: 29071723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interest of presbyopes in contact lens correction and their success with monovision.
    Gauthier CA; Holden BA; Grant T; Chong MS
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Nov; 69(11):858-62. PubMed ID: 1454302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monovision: Consequences for depth perception from large disparities.
    Smith CE; Allison RS; Wilkinson F; Wilcox LM
    Exp Eye Res; 2019 Jun; 183():62-67. PubMed ID: 30237103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interocular Differences in Spatial Frequency Influence the Pulfrich Effect.
    Min SH; Reynaud A; Hess RF
    Vision (Basel); 2020 Mar; 4(1):. PubMed ID: 32244910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of sensory ocular dominance on through-focus visual performance in monovision presbyopia corrections.
    Zheleznyak L; Alarcon A; Dieter KC; Tadin D; Yoon G
    J Vis; 2015; 15(6):17. PubMed ID: 26024464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.