These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33000438)

  • 1. Effects of task probability on prioritized processing: Modulating the efficiency of parallel response selection.
    Miller J; Tang JL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):356-388. PubMed ID: 33000438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological evidence against parallel motor processing during multitasking.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Leuthold H; Miller J
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Jan; 59(1):e13951. PubMed ID: 34628652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transfer of task-probability-induced biases in parallel dual-task processing occurs in similar, but is constraint in distinct task sets.
    Lück I; Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Fischer R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 May; 50(5):775-795. PubMed ID: 37470986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Separating limits on preparation versus online processing in multitasking paradigms: Evidence for resource models.
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 27808552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Just do it when you get a chance": the effects of a background task on primary task performance.
    Miller J; Durst M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2560-74. PubMed ID: 25078634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance.
    Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1368-84. PubMed ID: 9988597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Backward compatibility effects in younger and older adults.
    Hartley AA; Maquestiaux F; Festini SB; Frazier K; Krimmer PJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1337-50. PubMed ID: 27146993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):934-53. PubMed ID: 23592183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to stop and change a response: the role of goal activation in multitasking.
    Verbruggen F; Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1212-28. PubMed ID: 18823206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysiological measurement of backward response activation in the prioritized processing paradigm.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 May; 43(5):941-953. PubMed ID: 28252986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting high levels of multitasking reduces between-tasks interactions.
    Fischer R; Dreisbach G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1482-7. PubMed ID: 26480246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. P300-based Stroop study with low probability and target Stroop oddballs: the evidence still favors the response selection hypothesis.
    Rosenfeld JP; Skogsberg KR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jun; 60(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 16102861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flexibility of individual multitasking strategies in task-switching with preview: are preferences for serial versus overlapping task processing dependent on between-task conflict?
    Brüning J; Manzey D
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):92-108. PubMed ID: 28983726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Backward crosstalk and the role of dimensional overlap within and between tasks.
    Huestegge L; Pieczykolan A; Janczyk M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():139-147. PubMed ID: 29933176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two sources of task prioritization: The interplay of effector-based and task order-based capacity allocation in the PRP paradigm.
    Hoffmann MA; Pieczykolan A; Koch I; Huestegge L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3402-3414. PubMed ID: 32533527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anticipatory affect during action preparation: evidence from backward compatibility in dual-task performance.
    Eder AB; Pfister R; Dignath D; Hommel B
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Sep; 31(6):1211-1224. PubMed ID: 27414187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.