These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33000664)

  • 1. Breast Specimen Measurement Methodology and Its Potential Major Impact on Tumor Size.
    Haddad M; Xu B; Pun C; Lu FI; Parra-Herran C; Nofech-Mozes S; Slodkowska E
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2021 Feb; 29(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 33000664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tumor Size in Breast Carcinoma: Gross Measurement Is Important!
    Hamza A; Sakhi R; Alrajjal A; Ibrar W; Miller S; Salehi S; Edens J; Ockner D
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2018 Sep; 26(6):494-499. PubMed ID: 29569502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variability in gross and microscopic pathology reporting in excisional biopsies of breast cancer tissue.
    Apple SK
    Breast J; 2006; 12(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16509839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of tissue fixation and processing on breast cancer size.
    Pritt B; Tessitore JJ; Weaver DL; Blaszyk H
    Hum Pathol; 2005 Jul; 36(7):756-60. PubMed ID: 16084944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does size matter? Comparison study between MRI, gross, and microscopic tumor sizes in breast cancer in lumpectomy specimens.
    Behjatnia B; Sim J; Bassett LW; Moatamed NA; Apple SK
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2010 Feb; 3(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 20224728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Neuschatz AC; DiPetrillo T; Steinhoff M; Safaii H; Yunes M; Landa M; Chung M; Cady B; Wazer DE
    Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(7):1917-24. PubMed ID: 11932892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional tumor visualization of invasive breast carcinomas using whole-mount serial section histopathology: implications for tumor size assessment.
    Clarke GM; Holloway CMB; Zubovits JT; Nofech-Mozes S; Murray M; Liu K; Wang D; Kiss A; Yaffe MJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Apr; 174(3):669-677. PubMed ID: 30612274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
    Wood WC
    Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of specimen radiography in patients treated with skin-sparing mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Rubio IT; Mirza N; Sahin AA; Whitman G; Kroll SS; Ames FC; Singletary SE
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2000 Aug; 7(7):544-8. PubMed ID: 10947024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Operative outcomes of conventional specimen radiography versus in-operating room specimen radiography in radioactive seed-localized segmental mastectomies.
    Rhee D; Pockaj B; Wasif N; Stucky CC; Pizzitola V; Giurescu M; Patel B; McCarthy J; Gray R
    Am J Surg; 2018 Jan; 215(1):151-154. PubMed ID: 28784236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: A comparison of surgical outcomes.
    Patel SN; Mango VL; Jadeja P; Friedlander L; Desperito E; Wynn R; Feldman S; Ha R
    Clin Imaging; 2018; 47():14-17. PubMed ID: 28818762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Standardized pathologic examination of breast excision specimen. Relevance within an interdisciplinary practice protocol for quality management of breast saving therapy].
    Decker T; Ruhnke M; Schneider W
    Pathologe; 1997 Jan; 18(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 9157405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding the mechanisms creating false positive lumpectomy margins.
    Dooley WC; Parker J
    Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):606-8. PubMed ID: 16164932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden.
    Wazer DE; Schmidt-Ullrich RK; Schmid CH; Ruthazer R; Kramer B; Safaii H; Graham R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 May; 38(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 9226315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
    Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
    Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Whole-mount pathology of breast lumpectomy specimens improves detection of tumour margins and focality.
    Clarke GM; Holloway CM; Zubovits JT; Nofech-Mozes S; Liu K; Murray M; Wang D; Yaffe MJ
    Histopathology; 2016 Jul; 69(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 26644356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lack of Standardization in the Processing and Reporting of Post-Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Specimens.
    Han R; Regpala S; Slodkowska E; Nofech-Mozes S; Hanna W; Parra-Herran C; Lu FI
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 Oct; 144(10):1262-1270. PubMed ID: 32142368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is breast specimen shrinkage really a problem in breast-conserving surgery?
    Krekel NM; van Slooten HJ; Barbé E; de Lange de Klerk ES; Meijer S; van den Tol MP
    J Clin Pathol; 2012 Mar; 65(3):224-7. PubMed ID: 22049220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High resolution intra-operative two-dimensional specimen mammography and its impact on second operation for re-excision of positive margins at final pathology after breast conservation surgery.
    Bathla L; Harris A; Davey M; Sharma P; Silva E
    Am J Surg; 2011 Oct; 202(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 21943945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increased sectioning of pathologic specimens with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: are there clinical consequences?
    Miller KL; Marks LB; Barrier RC; Leight GS; Clough RW; Prosnitz RG; Bentley RC
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2003 Aug; 4(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 14499013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.