120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33000928)
1. Evaluation of the Minimum Clinically Important Differences of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Fukushima M; Oka H; Oshima Y; Yuzawa Y; Matsudaira K; Tanaka S; Inanami H
Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Dec; 33(10):E499-E503. PubMed ID: 33000928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimal clinically important differences in walking capacity and physical activity after nonsurgical treatment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Minetama M; Kawakami M; Teraguchi M; Nakagawa M; Yamamoto Y; Sakon N; Nakatani T; Matsuo S; Nakagawa Y
Spine J; 2024 Feb; 24(2):256-262. PubMed ID: 37871657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Responsiveness of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Undergoing Nonsurgical Treatment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Minetama M; Kawakami M; Teraguchi M; Nakagawa M; Yamamoto Y; Sakon N; Nakatani T; Matsuo S; Nakagawa Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38468569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation and Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Korean Version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Kim HJ; Lee YK; Kim DO; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Jan; 43(2):E105-E110. PubMed ID: 28525407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I
Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The critical cutoff point of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score indicating locomotive syndrome in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Araki M; Nonoshita H; Kitano S; Shigematsu H; Tanaka M; Kawasaki S; Suga Y; Yamamoto Y; Tanaka Y
J Orthop Sci; 2021 Mar; 26(2):290-294. PubMed ID: 32253080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Responsiveness of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Index, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, the 8-Item Short Form Health Survey, and the Euroqol 5 dimensions 5 level in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Fujimori T; Ikegami D; Sugiura T; Sakaura H
Eur Spine J; 2022 Jun; 31(6):1399-1412. PubMed ID: 35524825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychometric Assessment of the Japanese Version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ): Reliability and Validity.
Hara N; Matsudaira K; Masuda K; Tohnosu J; Takeshita K; Kobayashi A; Murakami M; Kawamura N; Yamakawa K; Terayama S; Ogihara S; Shiono H; Morii J; Hayakawa K; Kato S; Nakamura K; Oka H; Sawada T; Inuzuka K; Kikuchi N
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0160183. PubMed ID: 27467254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Five-year results of a clinical pilot study utilizing a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Mlyavykh S; Ludwig SC; Kepler CK; Anderson DG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 29856305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.
Deer TR; Kim CK; Bowman RG; Ranson MT; Yee BS
Pain Physician; 2012; 15(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 23159960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic intermittent claudication and treatment with the Aperius PercLID System: a preliminary report.
Galarza M; Fabrizi AP; Maina R; Gazzeri R; Martínez-Lage JF
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E3. PubMed ID: 20568919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of three conservative treatments in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: lumbar spinal stenosis with acupuncture and physical therapy study (LAP study).
Oka H; Matsudaira K; Takano Y; Kasuya D; Niiya M; Tonosu J; Fukushima M; Oshima Y; Fujii T; Tanaka S; Inanami H
BMC Complement Altern Med; 2018 Jan; 18(1):19. PubMed ID: 29351748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of 2-year follow-up outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with physical therapy alone and those with surgical intervention after less successful physical therapy.
Minetama M; Kawakami M; Nakagawa M; Ishimoto Y; Nagata K; Fukui D; Sumiya T; Kitagawa T; Miyake T; Yamamoto Y; Sakon N; Matsuoka T; Nakagawa Y
J Orthop Sci; 2018 May; 23(3):470-476. PubMed ID: 29395806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Supervised physical therapy vs. home exercise for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.
Minetama M; Kawakami M; Teraguchi M; Kagotani R; Mera Y; Sumiya T; Nakagawa M; Yamamoto Y; Matsuo S; Koike Y; Sakon N; Nakatani T; Kitano T; Nakagawa Y
Spine J; 2019 Aug; 19(8):1310-1318. PubMed ID: 30986577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer.
Shabat S; Miller LE; Block JE; Gepstein R
Clin Interv Aging; 2011; 6():227-33. PubMed ID: 21966217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-Year Evaluation of the X-STOP Interspinous Spacer in Different Primary Patient Populations With Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication Because of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Hartjen CA; Resnick DK; Hsu KY; Zucherman JF; Hsu EH; Skidmore GA
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):305-11. PubMed ID: 23168396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of preoperative mental health on clinical outcomes after laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kobayashi Y; Ogura Y; Kitagawa T; Tadokoro T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Oct; 185():105481. PubMed ID: 31442743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Twelve-month results of a clinical pilot study utilizing pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Mlyavykh S; Ludwig SC; Mobasser JP; Kepler CK; Anderson DG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 23373562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
