120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33000928)
21. Lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with Aperius perclid interspinous system.
Surace MF; Fagetti A; Fozzato S; Cherubino P
Eur Spine J; 2012 May; 21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S69-74. PubMed ID: 22430539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Minimally clinically important differences for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Nov; 69():93-96. PubMed ID: 31416735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Decompression of lumbar canal stenosis with a bilateral interlaminar versus classic laminectomy technique: a prospective randomized study.
Soliman MAR; Ali A
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E3. PubMed ID: 31042649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Machine learning-based preoperative predictive analytics for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Siccoli A; de Wispelaere MP; Schröder ML; Staartjes VE
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E5. PubMed ID: 31042660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Stand-alone interspinous spacer versus decompressive laminectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lauryssen C; Jackson RJ; Baron JM; Tallarico RA; Lavelle WF; Deutsch H; Block JE; Geisler FH
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2015; 12(6):763-9. PubMed ID: 26487285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Study Design and Protocol.
Benyamin RM; Staats PS
Pain Physician; 2015; 18(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 26218933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the 6-Minute Walk Distance in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Surgery: 12 Months Follow-Up.
Takenaka H; Kamiya M; Sugiura H; Nishihama K; Suzuki J; Hanamura S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Apr; 48(8):559-566. PubMed ID: 36728803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validation and reliability of the Persian version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Talebian P; Golbakhsh M; Mirzashahi B; Zarei M; Rahimian A; Soleimani M
N Am Spine Soc J; 2023 Sep; 15():100237. PubMed ID: 37521123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in the Smartphone-based 6-minute Walking Test After Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.
Zeitlberger AM; Sosnova M; Ziga M; Regli L; Bozinov O; Weyerbrock A; Stienen MN; Maldaner N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Sep; 46(18):E959-E965. PubMed ID: 34042414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Report of 6-Month Results.
Staats PS; Benyamin RM;
Pain Physician; 2016 Feb; 19(2):25-38. PubMed ID: 26815247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the 6-minute Walk Distance in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Surgery.
Takenaka H; Kamiya M; Sugiura H; Nishihama K; Ito A; Suzuki J; Hanamura S
Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Apr; 35(3):E345-E350. PubMed ID: 34039891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Two-year clinical outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing two interspinous spacers for treatment of moderate lumbar spinal stenosis.
Patel VV; Whang PG; Haley TR; Bradley WD; Nunley PD; Miller LE; Block JE; Geisler FH
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Jul; 15():221. PubMed ID: 24996648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical evaluation of the preliminary safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive interspinous process device APERIUS(®) in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication.
Van Meirhaeghe J; Fransen P; Morelli D; Craig NJ; Godde G; Mihalyi A; Collignon F
Eur Spine J; 2012 Dec; 21(12):2565-72. PubMed ID: 22565799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Neuropathic Pain Was Associated with Central Sensitivity Syndrome in Patients with Preoperative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Using the painDETECT and Central Sensitization Inventory Questionnaires: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Iwasaki R; Miki T; Miyazaki M; Kanetaka C; Mitsuyama T; Ota K
Pain Res Manag; 2023; 2023():9963627. PubMed ID: 37207128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kuchta J; Sobottke R; Eysel P; Simons P
Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):823-9. PubMed ID: 19387698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical Outcomes in Neurogenic Claudication Using a Multimodal Program for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Study of 49 Patients With Prospective Long-term Follow-up.
Chow NW; Southerst D; Wong JJ; Kopansky-Giles D; Ammendolia C
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2019; 42(3):203-209. PubMed ID: 31029469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comprehensive Nonsurgical Treatment Versus Self-directed Care to Improve Walking Ability in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Trial.
Ammendolia C; Côté P; Southerst D; Schneider M; Budgell B; Bombardier C; Hawker G; Rampersaud YR
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Dec; 99(12):2408-2419.e2. PubMed ID: 29935152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
