BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33000994)

  • 1. Economic evaluation of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in the first-line treatment of advanced melanoma in Japan.
    Paly VF; Hikichi Y; Baker T; Itakura E; Chandran N; Harrison J
    J Med Econ; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1542-1552. PubMed ID: 33000994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-Utility of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in the United States: An Analysis Using Long-Term Overall Survival Data from Checkmate 067.
    Baker T; Johnson H; Kotapati S; Moshyk A; Hamilton M; Kurt M; Paly VF
    Pharmacoecon Open; 2022 Sep; 6(5):697-710. PubMed ID: 36006606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus two cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.
    Polyzoi M; Sandhu H; Maervoet J; Yuan Y; Chaudhary MA; Varol N; Lee A; Dale P; Jones C; Lubinga SJ; Penrod JR
    J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):660-668. PubMed ID: 35658806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy for first-line treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.
    Berling M; Chaudhary MA; Yuan Y; Varol N; Dale P; Testa E; Klint J; Lee A; Lubinga SJ; Penrod JR
    J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):703-711. PubMed ID: 35659172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination Therapy as First-line Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in Japan.
    Maeda T; Moriwaki K; Morimoto K; Mo X; Yoshioka T; Goto R; Shimozuma K
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2024 Mar; 40():118-126. PubMed ID: 38194896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab and ipilimumab versus pembrolizumab and axitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma with intermediate or poor prognostic risk: a Brazilian private healthcare system perspective.
    Dhanji N; Decimoni TC; Dyer MTD; May JR; van de Wetering G; Petersohn S; Nickel K; Silva A; Muniz DQB; Casagrande D Oliveira AP
    J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1108-1121. PubMed ID: 37632452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Melanoma.
    Kohn CG; Zeichner SB; Chen Q; Montero AJ; Goldstein DA; Flowers CR
    J Clin Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(11):1194-1202. PubMed ID: 28221865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab-Ipilimumab Combination Therapy Compared with Monotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma in the United States.
    Oh A; Tran DM; McDowell LC; Keyvani D; Barcelon JA; Merino O; Wilson L
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Jun; 23(6):653-664. PubMed ID: 28530525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma: analysis of Japanese patients in CheckMate 214 with extended follow-up.
    Tomita Y; Kondo T; Kimura G; Inoue T; Wakumoto Y; Yao M; Sugiyama T; Oya M; Fujii Y; Obara W; Motzer RJ; Uemura H
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 50(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 31633185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination Therapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Japan.
    Mo X; Moriwaki K; Morimoto K; Shimozuma K
    Clin Drug Investig; 2022 Jul; 42(7):599-609. PubMed ID: 35675029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Healthcare cost comparison analysis of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab versus nivolumab monotherapy and ipilimumab monotherapy in advanced melanoma.
    Potluri R; Ranjan S; Bhandari H; Johnson H; Moshyk A; Kotapati S
    Exp Hematol Oncol; 2019; 8():14. PubMed ID: 31312536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab with BRAF plus MEK inhibitors for the treatment of BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma
    Tarhini AA; Toor K; Chan K; McDermott DF; Mohr P; Larkin J; Hodi FS; Lee CH; Rizzo JI; Johnson H; Moshyk A; Rao S; Kotapati S; Atkins MB
    ESMO Open; 2021 Apr; 6(2):100050. PubMed ID: 33556898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survival outcomes and independent response assessment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: 42-month follow-up of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial.
    Motzer RJ; Escudier B; McDermott DF; Arén Frontera O; Melichar B; Powles T; Donskov F; Plimack ER; Barthélémy P; Hammers HJ; George S; Grünwald V; Porta C; Neiman V; Ravaud A; Choueiri TK; Rini BI; Salman P; Kollmannsberger CK; Tykodi SS; Grimm MO; Gurney H; Leibowitz-Amit R; Geertsen PF; Amin A; Tomita Y; McHenry MB; Saggi SS; Tannir NM
    J Immunother Cancer; 2020 Jul; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 32661118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frontline BRAF Testing-Guided Treatment for Advanced Melanoma in the Era of Immunotherapies: A Cost-Utility Analysis Based on Long-term Survival Data.
    Wu B; Shi L
    JAMA Dermatol; 2020 Nov; 156(11):1177-1184. PubMed ID: 32697281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a Japanese subgroup analysis of open-label, phase 3 trial (CheckMate 648/ONO-4538-50).
    Kato K; Doki Y; Ogata T; Motoyama S; Kawakami H; Ueno M; Kojima T; Shirakawa Y; Okada M; Ishihara R; Kubota Y; Amaya-Chanaga C; Chen T; Matsumura Y; Kitagawa Y
    Esophagus; 2023 Apr; 20(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 36401133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy compared to nivolumab monotherapy in advanced cancers (excluding melanoma): a systemic review and meta-analysis.
    Rangwala HS; Fatima H; Ali M; Sunder S; Devi S; Rangwala BS; Abbas SR
    J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2024 May; 36(1):14. PubMed ID: 38705953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of first-line immunotherapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    Yang SC; Ou HT; Su WC; Wang SY
    Cancer Med; 2023 Apr; 12(7):8838-8850. PubMed ID: 36653947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy for patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction or esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japan.
    Morimoto K; Moriwaki K; Shimozuma K; Nakayama T
    J Gastroenterol; 2023 Dec; 58(12):1188-1197. PubMed ID: 37725256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cohort versus patient level simulation for the economic evaluation of single versus combination immuno-oncology therapies in metastatic melanoma.
    Gibson EJ; Begum N; Koblbauer I; Dranitsaris G; Liew D; McEwan P; Yuan Y; Juarez-Garcia A; Tyas D; Pritchard C
    J Med Econ; 2019 Jun; 22(6):531-544. PubMed ID: 30638416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risks and benefits of reinduction ipilimumab/nivolumab in melanoma patients previously treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab.
    Chapman PB; Jayaprakasam VS; Panageas KS; Callahan M; Postow MA; Shoushtari AN; Wolchok JD; Betof Warner A
    J Immunother Cancer; 2021 Oct; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 34702752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.