These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33002031)

  • 1. How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a survey.
    Hardwicke TE; Goodman SN
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239598. PubMed ID: 33002031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals: caveat lector?
    Goodman SN; Altman DG; George SL
    J Gen Intern Med; 1998 Nov; 13(11):753-6. PubMed ID: 9824521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.
    Galipeau J; Barbour V; Baskin P; Bell-Syer S; Cobey K; Cumpston M; Deeks J; Garner P; MacLehose H; Shamseer L; Straus S; Tugwell P; Wager E; Winker M; Moher D
    BMC Med; 2016 Feb; 14():16. PubMed ID: 26837937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
    Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policies and Practices in Peer-reviewed Biomedical Journals.
    Cooper RJ; Gupta M; Wilkes MS; Hoffman JR
    J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Dec; 21(12):1248-52. PubMed ID: 17105524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.
    Harris AH; Reeder R; Hyun JK
    J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Oct; 43(15):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19435635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endorsement of ICMJE's Clinical Trial Registration Policy: a survey among journal editors.
    Hooft L; Korevaar DA; Molenaar N; Bossuyt PM; Scholten RJ
    Neth J Med; 2014 Sep; 72(7):349-55. PubMed ID: 25178768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology.
    Vickers AJ; Sjoberg DD;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 25037638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistics: all together now, one step at a time.
    Drummond GB; Paterson DJ; McLoughlin P; McGrath JC
    J Physiol; 2011 Apr; 589(Pt 8):1859. PubMed ID: 21498377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical reviewing policies in dermatology journals: results of a questionnaire survey of editors.
    Katz KA; Crawford GH; Lu DW; Kantor J; Margolis DJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Aug; 51(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 15280842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey.
    Wager E; Fiack S; Graf C; Robinson A; Rowlands I
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 19482976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Policies, practices, and attitudes of North American medical journal editors.
    Wilkes MS; Kravitz RL
    J Gen Intern Med; 1995 Aug; 10(8):443-50. PubMed ID: 7472701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of ARCADIA: a tool for assessing the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research.
    Superchi C; Hren D; Blanco D; Rius R; Recchioni A; Boutron I; González JA
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jun; 10(6):e035604. PubMed ID: 32518211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can't Get No Reproduction: Leading Researchers Discuss the Problem of Irreproducible Results.
    Williams R
    Circ Res; 2015 Sep; 117(8):667-70. PubMed ID: 26405184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.
    Chauvin A; Ravaud P; Baron G; Barnes C; Boutron I
    BMC Med; 2015 Jul; 13():158. PubMed ID: 26141137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
    Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research design and statistical methods in Indian medical journals: a retrospective survey.
    Hassan S; Yellur R; Subramani P; Adiga P; Gokhale M; Iyer MS; Mayya SS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0121268. PubMed ID: 25856194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reporting of Basic Statistical Methods in Biomedical Journals: Improved SAMPL Guidelines.
    Indrayan A
    Indian Pediatr; 2020 Jan; 57(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 31937697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study.
    Glonti K; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The relevance of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) for medical publishing and research].
    Reyes HB
    Rev Med Chil; 2014 Jan; 142(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 24861118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.