252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33002066)
21. Advantages of using a robotic stapler in rectal cancer surgery.
Tejedor P; Sagias F; Nock D; Flashman K; Naqvi S; Kandala NL; Khan JS
J Robot Surg; 2020 Apr; 14(2):365-370. PubMed ID: 31290074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 7 Randomized Controlled Trials.
Li L; Zhang W; Guo Y; Wang X; Yu H; Du B; Yang X; Luo Y
Surg Innov; 2019 Aug; 26(4):497-504. PubMed ID: 31081483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Versus Transanal Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Simillis C; Lal N; Thoukididou SN; Kontovounisios C; Smith JJ; Hompes R; Adamina M; Tekkis PP
Ann Surg; 2019 Jul; 270(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 30720507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Short-term Outcomes Following Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Technically Demanding Rectal Cancer.
Numata M; Kazama K; Onodera A; Hara K; Atsumi Y; Okamoto H; Aoyama T; Tamagawa H; Godai T; Saeki H; Yukawa N; Shiozawa M; Rino Y; Masuda M
Anticancer Res; 2020 Apr; 40(4):2337-2342. PubMed ID: 32234935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Risk factors of anastomotic leakage after robotic surgery for low and mid rectal cancer].
Chen JW; Chang WJ; Zhang ZY; He GD; Feng QY; Zhu DX; Yi T; Lin Q; Wei Y; Xu JM
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):364-369. PubMed ID: 32306604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Does conversion during laparoscopic rectal oncological surgery increases postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage rates? A meta-analysis.
Finochi M; Menahem B; Eid Y; Lubrano J; Alves A
J Visc Surg; 2020 Aug; 157(4):277-287. PubMed ID: 31870627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection for Diverticular Disease: A Single-Center Experience of 106 Cases.
Beltzer C; Knoerzer L; Bachmann R; Axt S; Dippel H; Schmidt R
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Nov; 29(11):1451-1455. PubMed ID: 31433257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of middle-low rectal cancer].
Zhang H; Yuan W; Zhou Q; Gu X; Wang F
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 May; 20(5):540-544. PubMed ID: 28534332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients.
Gorgun E; Ozben V; Costedio M; Stocchi L; Kalady M; Remzi F
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Nov; 18(11):1063-1071. PubMed ID: 27154266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study.
Watanabe J; Ishibe A; Suwa Y; Suwa H; Ota M; Kunisaki C; Endo I
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):202-208. PubMed ID: 30877565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Technical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal tumors: a single-center safety and feasibility study.
Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Takahashi T; Hayashi H; Higashi T; Fukada M; Asai R; Sato Y; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Matsuhashi N
Surg Today; 2024 May; 54(5):478-486. PubMed ID: 37907648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Have early postoperative complications from laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery improved over the past 20 years?
Shearer R; Gale M; Aly OE; Aly EH
Colorectal Dis; 2013; 15(10):1211-26. PubMed ID: 23711242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].
Ye SP; Shi J; Liu DN; Jiang QG; Lei X; Tang C; Qiu H; Li TY
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 57(6):447-451. PubMed ID: 31142070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of robotic‑assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yao Q; Sun QN; Ren J; Wang LH; Wang DR
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Nov; 149(16):15207-15217. PubMed ID: 37580404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. TME for rectal cancer: consecutive 70 patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic technique-cumulative experience in a single centre.
Mégevand JL; Lillo E; Amboldi M; Lenisa L; Ambrosi A; Rusconi A
Updates Surg; 2019 Jun; 71(2):331-338. PubMed ID: 31028665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Conversion is a risk factor for postoperative anastomotic leak in rectal cancer patients - A retrospective cohort study.
Liu XH; Wu XR; Zhou C; Zheng XB; Ke J; Liu HS; Hu T; Chen YF; He XW; He XS; Chen YL; Zou YF; Wang JP; Wu XJ; Lan P
Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():298-303. PubMed ID: 29367043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Stapler Use for Rectal Transection in Robotic Surgery for Cancer.
Atasoy D; Aytac E; Ozben V; Bayraktar O; Erenler Bayraktar I; Aghayeva A; Baca B; Hamzaoglu I; Karahasanoglu T
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 May; 28(5):501-505. PubMed ID: 29360006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Pooled Analysis of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
Wang Y; Zhao GH; Yang H; Lin J
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Jun; 26(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 27213786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Patient-Related Functional Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Rectal Surgery Compared With a Laparoscopic Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Flynn J; Larach JT; Kong JCH; Waters PS; McCormick JJ; Warrier SK; Heriot A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Oct; 65(10):1191-1204. PubMed ID: 35853177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of efficacy and safety of robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery for choledochal cyst in children: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.
Zhang MX; Chi SQ; Cao GQ; Tang JF; Tang ST
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jan; 37(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 35913517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
