These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33002368)

  • 1. Perceptual Benefits of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aids With Children: A Within-Subject Design Using Clinically Available Hearing Aids.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Scollie S; O'Hagan R; Glista D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Nov; 63(11):3834-3846. PubMed ID: 33002368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech recognition, loudness, and preference with extended bandwidth hearing aids for adult hearing aid users.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Folkeard P; Glista D; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):780-791. PubMed ID: 32309996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection, Speech Recognition, Loudness, and Preference Outcomes With a Direct Drive Hearing Aid: Effects of Bandwidth.
    Folkeard P; Eeckhoutte MV; Levy S; Dundas D; Abbasalipour P; Glista D; Agrawal S; Scollie S
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216521999139. PubMed ID: 33874803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
    Johnson EE; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Seeto A; Searchfield GD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Children's speech recognition and loudness perception with the Desired Sensation Level v5 Quiet and Noise prescriptions.
    Crukley J; Scollie SD
    Am J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 21(2):149-62. PubMed ID: 22617498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Extended-Wear Hearing Technology for Children with Hearing Loss.
    Wolfe J; Schafer E; Martella N; Morais M; Mann M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(7):615-31. PubMed ID: 26218051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-frequency audibility: the effects of audiometric configuration, stimulus type, and device.
    Kimlinger C; McCreery R; Lewis D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 25690773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual Implications of Level- and Frequency-Specific Deviations from Hearing Aid Prescription in Children.
    McCreery RW; Brennan M; Walker EA; Spratford M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):861-875. PubMed ID: 28972473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Hearing Aid Manufacturers' Software-Derived Fittings to DSL v5.0 Pediatric Targets.
    Folkeard P; Bagatto M; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):354-362. PubMed ID: 31639078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effects of Manufacturer's Prefit and Real-Ear Fitting on the Predicted Speech Perception of Children with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss.
    Quar TK; Umat C; Chew YY
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):346-356. PubMed ID: 30461383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Achieved Gain and Subjective Outcomes for a Wide-Bandwidth Contact Hearing Aid Fitted Using CAM2.
    Arbogast TL; Moore BCJ; Puria S; Dundas D; Brimacombe J; Edwards B; Carr Levy S
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):741-756. PubMed ID: 30300158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship of Grammatical Context on Children's Recognition of s/z-Inflected Words.
    Spratford M; McLean HH; McCreery R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):799-809. PubMed ID: 28972469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the CAMEQ2-HF method for fitting hearing aids with multichannel amplitude compression.
    Moore BC; Füllgrabe C
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):657-66. PubMed ID: 20526199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and nonlinear frequency compression for children with cookie-bite audiometric configurations.
    John A; Wolfe J; Scollie S; Schafer E; Hudson M; Woods W; Wheeler J; Hudgens K; Neumann S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(10):1022-33. PubMed ID: 25514454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Difference between the default telecoil (t-coil) and programmed microphone frequency response in behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids.
    Putterman DB; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):366-78. PubMed ID: 22533979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of digital signal processing features on children's speech recognition and loudness perception.
    Crukley J; Scollie SD
    Am J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 23(1):99-115. PubMed ID: 24018572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.