237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33002371)
1. Impact of PI-RADS Category 3 lesions on the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detecting prostate cancer and the prevalence of prostate cancer within each PI-RADS category: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wadera A; Alabousi M; Pozdnyakov A; Kashif Al-Ghita M; Jafri A; McInnes MD; Schieda N; van der Pol CB; Salameh JP; Samoilov L; Gusenbauer K; Alabousi A
Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20191050. PubMed ID: 33002371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis.
Hamoen EHJ; de Rooij M; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Rovers MM
Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1112-1121. PubMed ID: 25466942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer According to PI-RADS® Version 2 Categories: Meta-Analysis for Prospective Studies.
Park KJ; Choi SH; Lee JS; Kim JK; Kim MH; Jeong IG
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1141-1149. PubMed ID: 32716687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.
Tamada T; Kido A; Takeuchi M; Yamamoto A; Miyaji Y; Kanomata N; Sone T
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108704. PubMed ID: 31669798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement between PI-RADS v2.1 and PI-RADS v2: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee CH; Vellayappan B; Tan CH
Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210509. PubMed ID: 34520694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proposed Adjustments to PI-RADS Version 2 Decision Rules: Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection.
Rosenkrantz AB; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Ream JM
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):119-129. PubMed ID: 27783538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of diagnostic performance between two prostate imaging reporting and data system versions: A systematic review.
Li W; Xin C; Zhang L; Dong A; Xu H; Wu Y
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():111-119. PubMed ID: 31005160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of mandated prospectively reported apparent diffusion coefficient values on the rates of positivity for clinically significant prostate cancer by PI-RADS score.
Shaish H; Casals R; Ahmed F; Makkar J; Wenske S
Acta Radiol; 2021 Jan; 62(1):139-144. PubMed ID: 32312102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.
Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Carrion I; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):683-690. PubMed ID: 32755208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive clinical features for negative histopathology of MRI/Ultrasound-fusion-guided prostate biopsy in patients with high likelihood of cancer at prostate MRI: Analysis from a urologic outpatient clinic1.
Apfelbeck M; Pfitzinger P; Bischoff R; Rath L; Buchner A; Mumm JN; Schlenker B; Stief CG; Chaloupka M; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 76(4):503-511. PubMed ID: 33337358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and version 1 regarding interreader agreement and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Becker AS; Cornelius A; Reiner CS; Stocker D; Ulbrich EJ; Barth BK; Mortezavi A; Eberli D; Donati OF
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Sep; 94():58-63. PubMed ID: 28941761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions? A retrospective study in a high-volume academic center.
Hermie I; Van Besien J; De Visschere P; Lumen N; Decaestecker K
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():92-98. PubMed ID: 31005183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) is of additional predictive value in patients with PI-RADS grade III (intermediate) lesions in the MR-guided re-biopsy setting for prostate cancer.
Kaufmann S; Bedke J; Gatidis S; Hennenlotter J; Kramer U; Notohamiprodjo M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Kruck S
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 26267808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In-Bore 3-T MR-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2-based Diagnostic Performance for Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Tan N; Lin WC; Khoshnoodi P; Asvadi NH; Yoshida J; Margolis DJ; Lu DS; Wu H; Sung KH; Lu DY; Huang J; Raman SS
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):130-139. PubMed ID: 27861110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.
Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Chen T; Yu HC; Dai GC; Tu J; Yang S; Zhao WL; Shen JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 32755220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of PI-RADS v2 categories ≥ 3 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Patel NU; Lind KE; Garg K; Crawford D; Werahera PN; Pokharel SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):705-712. PubMed ID: 30171296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mazzone E; Stabile A; Pellegrino F; Basile G; Cignoli D; Cirulli GO; Sorce G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Cucchiara V; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):697-713. PubMed ID: 33358543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30577397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
