These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33002610)

  • 1. Single versus splinted short implants at sinus augmented sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Afrashtehfar KI; Katsoulis J; Koka S; Igarashi K
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jun; 122(3):303-310. PubMed ID: 33002610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
    Wallace SS; Froum SJ
    Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short (5 and 7 mm long) porous implants in the posterior atrophic maxilla: a 5-year report of a prospective single-cohort study.
    Perelli M; Abundo R; Corrente G; Saccone C
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 23000710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EAO Supplement Working Group 4 - EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review.
    Thoma DS; Zeltner M; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CH; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26 Suppl 11():154-69. PubMed ID: 25997901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review.
    Esposito M; Grusovin MG; Rees J; Karasoulos D; Felice P; Alissa R; Worthington H; Coulthard P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2010; 3(1):7-26. PubMed ID: 20467595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extra-Short 4-mm Implants Splinted to 10-mm Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: 3-year Results.
    Gašperšič R; Povšič K; Dard M; Linder S; Gjurin SŽ; Oblak Č
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Oct; 38(5):907-917. PubMed ID: 37847832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective study of sintered porous-surfaced dental implants placed in the augmented sinus.
    Sohn DS; Lee JM; Park IS; Jung HS; Park DY; Shin IH
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2014; 34(4):565-71. PubMed ID: 25006774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should the restoration of adjacent implants be splinted or nonsplinted? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Lemos CAA; Cruz RS; Oliveira HFF; Gomes JML; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 29961632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Split-Mouth Comparison of Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses on Short Implants: 3-Year Results.
    Clelland N; Chaudhry J; Rashid RG; McGlumphy E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 27632270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla Using Splinted Short Implants or Sinus Augmentation with Standard-Length Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Pieri F; Caselli E; Forlivesi C; Corinaldesi G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1179-88. PubMed ID: 27632276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short versus standard implants at sinus augmented sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Toledano M; Fernández-Romero E; Vallecillo C; Toledano R; Osorio MT; Vallecillo-Rivas M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Nov; 26(11):6681-6698. PubMed ID: 36070150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm-long, 4 mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Cannizzaro G; Soardi E; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Corvino V; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 22518377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short implants versus longer implants with maxillary sinus lift. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cruz RS; Lemos CAA; Batista VES; Oliveira HFFE; Gomes JML; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR
    Braz Oral Res; 2018; 32():e86. PubMed ID: 30231176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short implants (≤6mm) as an alternative treatment option to maxillary sinus lift.
    Carosi P; Lorenzi C; Lio F; Laureti M; Ferrigno N; Arcuri C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Nov; 50(11):1502-1510. PubMed ID: 33637392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation or 6-mm implants:A 5-year randomised controlled trial.
    Guljé FL; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Meijer HJA
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(3):315-326. PubMed ID: 31535100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extra-Short Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation: A Prospective Clinical Study.
    Nizam N; Gürlek Ö; Kaval ME
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):415-422. PubMed ID: 32142579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Use of 4-mm Implants Splinted to 10-mm Implants for Replacement of Multiple Missing Teeth in the Posterior Maxilla Region with Expanded Maxillary Sinus. An Observational Cases Series: Patient Characteristics and Preliminary Results.
    Gašperšič R; Dard M; Linder S; Oblak Č
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2021; 41(2):261-268. PubMed ID: 33819333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Influence of Prosthesis Design on the Outcomes of Tooth Implants Immediately Placed and Loaded by Means of One-Piece Titanium Machined Restoration.
    Toti P; Marconcini S; Enrica G; Pedretti G; Barone A; Covani U
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Apr; 44(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 29182488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Gastaldi G; Felice P; Pistilli V; Barausse C; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 29557400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-Year data.
    Thoma DS; Haas R; Sporniak-Tutak K; Garcia A; Taylor TD; Hämmerle CHF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Dec; 45(12):1465-1474. PubMed ID: 30341961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.