These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33003233)

  • 1. Optimizing the Chicken Wing Anatomy: Nomenclature Review and Description for Microsurgery and Supermicrosurgery Training.
    Navia A; Tejos R; Yañez R; Cuadra A; Dagnino B
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2022 Nov; 38(9):e1-e2. PubMed ID: 33003233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel supermicrosurgery training model: the chicken thigh.
    Chen WF; Eid A; Yamamoto T; Keith J; Nimmons GL; Lawrence WT
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Jul; 67(7):973-8. PubMed ID: 24742690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Insights to establish early learning curve in clinical supermicrosurgery.
    Pafitanis G; Narushima M; Yamamoto T; Miller R; Koshima I
    Microsurgery; 2019 Jan; 39(1):100-101. PubMed ID: 30561056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A New Supermicrosurgery Training Model of Saphenous Artery and Great Saphenous Vein Anastomosis for Development of Advanced Microsurgical Skills.
    Bas CE; Cwykiel J; Siemionow M
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2017 Jul; 33(6):426-434. PubMed ID: 28282675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Basic training model for supermicrosurgery: a novel practice card model.
    Matsumura N; Horie Y; Shibata T; Kubo M; Hayashi N; Endo S
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2011 Jul; 27(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 21717391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new training method to improve deep microsurgical skills using a mannequin head.
    Takeuchi M; Hayashi N; Hamada H; Matsumura N; Nishijo H; Endo S
    Microsurgery; 2008; 28(3):168-70. PubMed ID: 18286651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Novel Ex Vivo Training Model for Acquiring Supermicrosurgical Skills Using a Chicken Leg.
    Cifuentes IJ; Rodriguez JR; Yañez RA; Salisbury MC; Cuadra ÁJ; Varas JE; Dagnino BL
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2016 Nov; 32(9):699-705. PubMed ID: 27542106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and Evaluation of a Simulation Model for Microvascular Anastomosis Training.
    Willis RE; Wiersch J; Adams AJ; Al Fayyadh MJ; Weber RA; Wang HT
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2017 Sep; 33(7):493-501. PubMed ID: 28472839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative use of turkey and chicken wing brachial artery models for microvascular anastomosis training.
    Abla AA; Uschold T; Preul MC; Zabramski JM
    J Neurosurg; 2011 Dec; 115(6):1231-5. PubMed ID: 21962125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Refinement of the chicken wing supermicrosurgical training model: Pre-operative indocyanide green injection highlighting vessels' visualization under 0.4 mm of diameter.
    Ganry L; Fuse Y; Sakai H; Reiko T; Yamamoto T
    Microsurgery; 2019 Mar; 39(3):280-281. PubMed ID: 30666701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning of supermicrosurgical vascular anastomosis: MicroChirSim
    Galmiche C; Hidalgo Diaz JJ; Vernet P; Facca S; Menu G; Liverneaux P
    Hand Surg Rehabil; 2018 Feb; 37(1):20-23. PubMed ID: 29233543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Flower Petal Training System in Microsurgery: Validation of a Training Model Using a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Volovici V; Dammers R; Lawton MT; Dirven CMF; Ketelaar T; Lanzino G; Zamfirescu DG
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Dec; 83(6):697-701. PubMed ID: 31232823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-cost simulation plank for microsurgical success.
    Patel A; Shah A; Ahmad U; Indes J; Persing J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 May; 129(5):889e-890e. PubMed ID: 22544149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microsurgical training on an in vitro chicken wing infusion model.
    Olabe J; Olabe J
    Surg Neurol; 2009 Dec; 72(6):695-9. PubMed ID: 19329164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 360 degrees Microsurgical skills practice: a 'round-the-clock' training device.
    Chan WY; Mishra A; Srinivasan J; Ramakrishnan V
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008 Sep; 61(9):1110-1. PubMed ID: 18495565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anastomosis Lapse Index (ALI): A Validated End Product Assessment Tool for Simulation Microsurgery Training.
    Ghanem AM; Al Omran Y; Shatta B; Kim E; Myers S
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2016 Mar; 32(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 26645156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The chicken wing training model in cerebrovascular microsurgery for the side-to-side bypass.
    Mullarkey MP; Zeineddine HA; Honarpishesh P; Kole MJ; Cochran J
    J Clin Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 106():76-82. PubMed ID: 36272397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Live Rat Femoral Artery Model with Intraoperative Microvascular Anastomosis.
    Schaverien MV; Butler CE; Suami H; Liu J; Selber JC
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2017 Nov; 33(9):641-648. PubMed ID: 28806848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of computer games and musical instruments on microsurgery.
    Moustaki M; Masud D; Hachach-Haram N; Mohanna PN
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Jul; 70(7):982-984. PubMed ID: 28291688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of a microsurgery training program using a chicken wing model.
    Dave A; Singhal M; Tiwari R; Chauhan S; De M
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2022 Aug; 56(4):191-197. PubMed ID: 34339351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.