BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33003242)

  • 1. Pediatric Stainless-Steel Crown Cementation Finite Element Study.
    Waly AS; Souror YR; Yousief SA; Alqahtani WMS; El-Anwar MI
    Eur J Dent; 2021 Feb; 15(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 33003242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endocrown Feasibility for Primary Molars: A Finite Element Study.
    Abduljabar AH; Iskander AW; Elfezary MT; Wakwak MAA; Bathabt WA; Souror YR
    Eur J Dent; 2024 Feb; 18(1):208-213. PubMed ID: 37130553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The stress distribution of a primary molar tooth restored with stainless steel crown using different luting cements.
    Guler MS; Guler C; Belduz Kara N; Odabasi D; Bekci ML
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):269. PubMed ID: 38395853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of retentive groove, sandblasting and cement type on the retentive strength of stainless steel crowns in primary second molars--an in vitro comparative study.
    Veerabadhran MM; Reddy V; Nayak UA; Rao AP; Sundaram MA
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 22565513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns - an in vitro study.
    Raghunath Reddy MH; Subba Reddy VV; Basappa N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 21273711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type.
    Ha SR
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2015 Dec; 7(6):475-83. PubMed ID: 26816578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of stainless steel crowns cemented with glass-ionomer and resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements.
    Yilmaz Y; Simsek S; Dalmis A; Gurbuz T; Kocogullari ME
    Am J Dent; 2006 Apr; 19(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 16764134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crown fracture: Failure load, stress distribution, and fractographic analysis.
    Campos RE; Soares PV; Versluis A; de O Júnior OB; Ambrosano GM; Nunes IF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 26001492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns.
    Memarpour M; Mesbahi M; Rezvani G; Rahimi M
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(7):501-4. PubMed ID: 22353410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2013 Dec; 29(12):e309-17. PubMed ID: 24157244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictions of cement microfracture under crowns using 3D-FEA.
    Kamposiora P; Papavasiliou G; Bayne SC; Felton DA
    J Prosthodont; 2000 Dec; 9(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 11320472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Stresses Generated within the Supporting Structures of Mandibular Second Molars Restored with Different Crown Materials: 3-D Finite Element Analysis (FEA).
    Abuelenain DA; Ajaj R; El-Bab EI; Hammouda MM
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Aug; 24(6):484-93. PubMed ID: 25521774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement.
    Johnson GH; Hazelton LR; Bales DJ; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):428-35. PubMed ID: 15153849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Helal MA; Wang Z
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):988-996. PubMed ID: 29067737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    Pathak S; Shashibhushan KK; Poornima P; Reddy VS
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 9(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 27843249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The survival of resin modified glass ionomer and stainless steel crown restorations in primary molars, placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice.
    Roberts JF; Attari N; Sherriff M
    Br Dent J; 2005 Apr; 198(7):427-31. PubMed ID: 15870802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns--an in vitro study.
    Reddy R; Basappa N; Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1998 Mar; 16(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11813717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of stresses in fixed prosthesis and cement layer using a three-dimensional model.
    Sangeetha A; Padmanabhan TV; Subramaniam R; Ramkumar V
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2012 Aug; 4(Suppl 2):S384-9. PubMed ID: 23066295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of cervical finish line, internal relief, and cement type on the cervical adaptation of metal crowns.
    Bottino MA; Valandro LF; Buso L; Ozcan M
    Quintessence Int; 2007; 38(7):e425-32. PubMed ID: 17694207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations.
    Yim NH; Rueggeberg FA; Caughman WF; Gardner FM; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 10756297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.