These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33003755)

  • 21. Accelerating Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Drug Discovery.
    Koirala K; Joshi K; Adediwura V; Wang J; Do H; Miao Y
    Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2714():187-202. PubMed ID: 37676600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Kinetics of Ligand Binding Through Advanced Computational Approaches: A Review.
    Dickson A; Tiwary P; Vashisth H
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2017; 17(23):2626-2641. PubMed ID: 28413946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Role of Resultant Dipole Moment in Mechanical Dissociation of Biological Complexes.
    Kouza M; Banerji A; Kolinski A; Buhimschi I; Kloczkowski A
    Molecules; 2018 Aug; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 30103417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computational study on the unbinding pathways of B-RAF inhibitors and its implication for the difference of residence time: insight from random acceleration and steered molecular dynamics simulations.
    Niu Y; Li S; Pan D; Liu H; Yao X
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Feb; 18(7):5622-9. PubMed ID: 26862741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Role of water and steric constraints in the kinetics of cavity-ligand unbinding.
    Tiwary P; Mondal J; Morrone JA; Berne BJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Sep; 112(39):12015-9. PubMed ID: 26371312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Kinetics of Ligand-Protein Dissociation from All-Atom Simulations: Are We There Yet?
    Ribeiro JML; Tsai ST; Pramanik D; Wang Y; Tiwary P
    Biochemistry; 2019 Jan; 58(3):156-165. PubMed ID: 30547565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A combination of machine learning and infrequent metadynamics to efficiently predict kinetic rates, transition states, and molecular determinants of drug dissociation from G protein-coupled receptors.
    Lamim Ribeiro JM; Provasi D; Filizola M
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Sep; 153(12):124105. PubMed ID: 33003748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attempting Well-Tempered Funnel Metadynamics Simulations for the Evaluation of the Binding Kinetics of Methionine Aminopeptidase-II Inhibitors.
    Rubina ; Moin ST
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Dec; 63(24):7729-7743. PubMed ID: 38059911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Towards fast, rigorous and efficient conformational sampling of biomolecules: Advances in accelerated molecular dynamics.
    Doshi U; Hamelberg D
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 May; 1850(5):878-888. PubMed ID: 25153688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Investigating Drug-Target Residence Time in Kinases through Enhanced Sampling Simulations.
    Gobbo D; Piretti V; Di Martino RMC; Tripathi SK; Giabbai B; Storici P; Demitri N; Girotto S; Decherchi S; Cavalli A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Aug; 15(8):4646-4659. PubMed ID: 31246463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ligand Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics 2 (LiGaMD2): Improved Calculations of Ligand Binding Thermodynamics and Kinetics with Closed Protein Pocket.
    Wang J; Miao Y
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Feb; 19(3):733-745. PubMed ID: 36706316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ligand Release Pathways Obtained with WExplore: Residence Times and Mechanisms.
    Dickson A; Lotz SD
    J Phys Chem B; 2016 Jun; 120(24):5377-85. PubMed ID: 27231969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. MD-Ligand-Receptor: A High-Performance Computing Tool for Characterizing Ligand-Receptor Binding Interactions in Molecular Dynamics Trajectories.
    Pieroni M; Madeddu F; Di Martino J; Arcieri M; Parisi V; Bottoni P; Castrignanò T
    Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Jul; 24(14):. PubMed ID: 37511429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ligand unbinding pathways from the vitamin D receptor studied by molecular dynamics simulations.
    Peräkylä M
    Eur Biophys J; 2009 Feb; 38(2):185-98. PubMed ID: 18836710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Decoding the Role of Water Dynamics in Ligand-Protein Unbinding: CRF1R as a Test Case.
    Bortolato A; Deflorian F; Weiss DR; Mason JS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Sep; 55(9):1857-66. PubMed ID: 26335976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How Effectively Can Adaptive Sampling Methods Capture Spontaneous Ligand Binding?
    Betz RM; Dror RO
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Mar; 15(3):2053-2063. PubMed ID: 30645108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Supervised Molecular Dynamics Approach to Unbiased Ligand-Protein Unbinding.
    Deganutti G; Moro S; Reynolds CA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Mar; 60(3):1804-1817. PubMed ID: 32126172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Machine Learning Approach for the Discovery of Ligand-Specific Functional Mechanisms of GPCRs.
    Plante A; Shore DM; Morra G; Khelashvili G; Weinstein H
    Molecules; 2019 Jun; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 31159491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retinal release from opsin in molecular dynamics simulations.
    Wang T; Duan Y
    J Mol Recognit; 2011; 24(2):350-8. PubMed ID: 21360617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Parameterization of Large Ligands for Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulation with LigParGen.
    Chen YW; Wang Y; Leung YC; Wong KY
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2199():277-288. PubMed ID: 33125656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.