These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33003895)

  • 1. Attenuation characteristics of an extended-wear hearing aid: Impulse and continuous noise.
    Brungart DS; Spencer NJ; Pryor N; Abouzahra N; McKenna EA; Iyer N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Sep; 148(3):1404. PubMed ID: 33003895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spectral analysis of hearing protector impulsive insertion loss.
    Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Murphy WJ; Stergar ME
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):13-21. PubMed ID: 27885881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of extended-wear hearing aids on the localization accuracy of listeners with normal audiometric thresholds.
    Spencer NJ; Sherlock LP; Pryor N; Iyer N; Gallagher HL; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Jul; 156(1):475-488. PubMed ID: 39013035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An acoustic head simulator for hearing protector evaluation. II: Measurements in steady-state and impulse noise environments.
    Giguère C; Kunov H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1197-205. PubMed ID: 2708666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Real-ear attenuation of earmuffs in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.
    Suter AH; Lempert BL; Franks JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2114-7. PubMed ID: 2348018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimation of the field attenuation of hearing protection devices: sample size necessary to provide acceptable reproducibility.
    Murphy WJ; Franks JR; Berger EH; Behar A; Casali JG; Dixon-Ernst C; Krieg EF; Mozo BT; Royster JD; Royster LH; Simon SD; Stephenson C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan; 115(1):311-23. PubMed ID: 14759024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Measurement and evaluation of personal attenuation rating before and after the training of the noise-exposed workers wearing foam earplugs].
    Liu J; Wang X; Zhang R; Bao YH; Gu KF; Pan LP
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2024 Aug; 42(8):589-593. PubMed ID: 39223044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noise reduction at the shooting range by means of level-dependent hearing protectors.
    Młyński R; Kozłowski E
    Med Pr; 2019 Jun; 70(3):265-273. PubMed ID: 30887954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of the real-world noise attenuation of the current hearing protection devices in typical workplaces using Field Microphone in Real Ear method.
    Aliabadi M; Biabani A; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
    Work; 2018; 60(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 29865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
    Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Four earplugs in search of a rating system.
    Franks JR; Murphy WJ; Johnson JL; Harris DA
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 10890730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
    Abel SM; Odell P
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss for four hearing protection devices in field conditions.
    Murphy WJ; Flamme GA; Meinke DK; Sondergaard J; Finan DS; Lankford JE; Khan A; Vernon J; Stewart M
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51 Suppl 1(0 1):S31-42. PubMed ID: 22176308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube.
    Murphy WJ; Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Shaw PB; Stergar M
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):364-73. PubMed ID: 26356380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
    Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
    Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved hearing protector attenuation through the use of a lubricant.
    Ryan TJ; Meier RS; Tatarka A
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Nov; 14(11):931-937. PubMed ID: 28763289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.