These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33004466)

  • 1. High-impact RCTs without prospective informed consent: a systematic review.
    Dhamanaskar R; Merz JF
    J Investig Med; 2020 Dec; 68(8):1341-1348. PubMed ID: 33004466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cluster over individual randomization: are study design choices appropriately justified? Review of a random sample of trials.
    Taljaard M; Goldstein CE; Giraudeau B; Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Hey SP; Brehaut JC; Jairath V; London AJ; Eldridge SM; Grimshaw JM; Fergusson DA; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2020 Jun; 17(3):253-263. PubMed ID: 32367741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation.
    Goldstein CE; Weijer C; Brehaut JC; Fergusson DA; Grimshaw JM; Horn AR; Taljaard M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 29482537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Refusal rates and waivers of informed consent in pragmatic and comparative effectiveness RCTs: A systematic review.
    Lin LY; Jochym N; Merz JF
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 May; 104():106361. PubMed ID: 33737197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A limited number of medicines pragmatic trials had potential for waived informed consent following the 2016 CIOMS ethical guidelines.
    Dal-Ré R; Avendaño-Solà C; de Boer A; James SK; Rosendaal FR; Stephens R; Ioannidis JPA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 114():60-71. PubMed ID: 31212001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders.
    Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Zwarenstein M; Brehaut JC; Weijer C; Hey SP; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Grimshaw JM; McKenzie JE; Fergusson DA; Taljaard M;
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):765. PubMed ID: 31870433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proposals to Conduct Randomized Controlled Trials Without Informed Consent: a Narrative Review.
    Flory JH; Mushlin AI; Goodman ZI
    J Gen Intern Med; 2016 Dec; 31(12):1511-1518. PubMed ID: 27384536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials.
    Ryan RE; Prictor MJ; McLaughlin KJ; Hill SJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jan; (1):CD003717. PubMed ID: 18254029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
    Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.
    Gillies K; Entwistle V; Treweek SP; Fraser C; Williamson PR; Campbell MK
    Trials; 2015 Oct; 16():484. PubMed ID: 26507504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practicalities of Impracticability: An Interim Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Dhamanaskar R; Feldman WB; Merz JF
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2022 Jul; 17(3):329-345. PubMed ID: 35440213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures.
    Kinnersley P; Phillips K; Savage K; Kelly MJ; Farrell E; Morgan B; Whistance R; Lewis V; Mann MK; Stephens BL; Blazeby J; Elwyn G; Edwards AG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jul; (7):CD009445. PubMed ID: 23832767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictors of ethical approval and informed consent in orthodontic RCTs.
    Fitzgerald RC; Burnside G; Harrison JE
    J Orthod; 2013 Sep; 40(3):234-43. PubMed ID: 24009323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review.
    Montalvo W; Larson E
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2014 Nov; 46(6):423-31. PubMed ID: 25130209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.
    King M; Nazareth I; Lampe F; Bower P; Chandler M; Morou M; Sibbald B; Lai R
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Sep; 9(35):1-186, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16153352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethics and practice of Trials within Cohorts: An emerging pragmatic trial design.
    Kim SY; Flory J; Relton C
    Clin Trials; 2018 Feb; 15(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 29224380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.
    Husk K; Lovell R; Cooper C; Stahl-Timmins W; Garside R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 May; 2016(5):CD010351. PubMed ID: 27207731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethical Acceptability of Postrandomization Consent in Pragmatic Clinical Trials.
    Miller DG; Kim SYH; Li X; Dickert NW; Flory J; Runge CP; Relton C
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Dec; 1(8):e186149. PubMed ID: 30646316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.