BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33006394)

  • 1. Effective methylation triage of HPV positive women with abnormal cytology in a middle-income country.
    Ramírez AT; Sánchez GI; Nedjai B; Agudelo MC; Brentnall AR; Cuschieri K; Castañeda KM; Cuzick J; Lorincz AT;
    Int J Cancer; 2021 Mar; 148(6):1383-1393. PubMed ID: 33006394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methylation estimates the risk of precancer in HPV-infected women with discrepant results between cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping.
    Hernández-López R; Lorincz AT; Torres-Ibarra L; Reuter C; Scibior-Bentkowska D; Warman R; Nedjai B; Mendiola-Pastrana I; León-Maldonado L; Rivera-Paredez B; Ramírez-Palacios P; Lazcano-Ponce E; Cuzick J; Salmerón J;
    Clin Epigenetics; 2019 Oct; 11(1):140. PubMed ID: 31606044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA methylation testing with S5 for triage of high-risk HPV positive women.
    Adcock R; Nedjai B; Lorincz AT; Scibior-Bentkowska D; Banwait R; Torrez-Martinez N; Robertson M; Cuzick J; Wheeler CM;
    Int J Cancer; 2022 Oct; 151(7):993-1004. PubMed ID: 35477862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
    Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term prediction by DNA methylation of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Results of the ARTISTIC cohort.
    Gilham C; Nedjai B; Scibior-Bentkowska D; Reuter C; Banwait R; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Peto J; Lorincz AT
    Int J Cancer; 2024 Jul; 155(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 38507581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual staining for p16/Ki-67 to detect high-grade cervical lesions: Results from the Screening Triage Ascertaining Intraepithelial Neoplasia by Immunostain Testing study.
    El-Zein M; Gotlieb W; Gilbert L; Hemmings R; Behr MA; Franco EL;
    Int J Cancer; 2021 Jan; 148(2):492-501. PubMed ID: 32781481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing triage algorithms using HPV DNA genotyping, HPV E7 mRNA detection and cytology in high-risk HPV DNA-positive women.
    Luttmer R; Berkhof J; Dijkstra MG; van Kemenade FJ; Snijders PJ; Heideman DA; Meijer CJ
    J Clin Virol; 2015 Jun; 67():59-66. PubMed ID: 25959161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a validated methylation triage signature for human papillomavirus positive women in the HPV FOCAL cervical cancer screening trial.
    Cook DA; Krajden M; Brentnall AR; Gondara L; Chan T; Law JH; Smith LW; van Niekerk DJ; Ogilvie GS; Coldman AJ; Warman R; Reuter C; Cuzick J; Lorincz AT
    Int J Cancer; 2019 May; 144(10):2587-2595. PubMed ID: 30412281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA methylation marker for the triage of hrHPV positive women in cervical cancer screening: Real-world evidence in Taiwan.
    Chang CL; Ho SC; Su YF; Juan YC; Huang CY; Chao AS; Hsu ZS; Chang CF; Fwu CW; Chang TC
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 May; 161(2):429-435. PubMed ID: 33757653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical performance of methylation as a biomarker for cervical carcinoma in situ and cancer diagnosis: A worldwide study.
    Banila C; Lorincz AT; Scibior-Bentkowska D; Clifford GM; Kumbi B; Beyene D; Wheeler CM; Cuschieri K; Cuzick J; Nedjai B
    Int J Cancer; 2022 Jan; 150(2):290-302. PubMed ID: 34562270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) using HPV DNA testing after a diagnosis of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) in Catalonia, Spain.
    Ibáñez R; Moreno-Crespi J; Sardà M; Autonell J; Fibla M; Gutiérrez C; Lloveras B; Alejo M; Català I; Alameda F; Casas M; Bosch FX; de Sanjosé S
    BMC Infect Dis; 2012 Jan; 12():25. PubMed ID: 22280073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-year longitudinal data on the clinical performance of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test in a cervical cancer screening setting.
    Poljak M; Oštrbenk A; Seme K; Šterbenc A; Jančar N; Vrtačnik Bokal E
    J Clin Virol; 2016 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():S29-S39. PubMed ID: 26643051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis of the accuracy of p16 or p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry versus HPV testing for the detection of CIN2+/CIN3+ in triage of women with minor abnormal cytology.
    Peeters E; Wentzensen N; Bergeron C; Arbyn M
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Mar; 127(3):169-180. PubMed ID: 30811902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of CIN2+ /CIN3+ risk of different HPV subtypes infection combined with abnormal cytology status].
    Luo HX; Du H; Liu ZH; Zhang LJ; Wang C; Wu RF
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 40(3):232-238. PubMed ID: 29575846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliable identification of women with CIN3+ using hrHPV genotyping and methylation markers in a cytology-screened referral population.
    Leeman A; Del Pino M; Marimon L; Torné A; Ordi J; Ter Harmsel B; Meijer CJLM; Jenkins D; Van Kemenade FJ; Quint WGV
    Int J Cancer; 2019 Jan; 144(1):160-168. PubMed ID: 30098013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.
    Canfell K; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Heley S; Brotherton J; Gertig D; Jennett CJ; Farnsworth A; Tan J; Wrede CD; Castle PE; Saville M
    PLoS Med; 2017 Sep; 14(9):e1002388. PubMed ID: 28926579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of HPV16/18 in Triage of Cytological Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance.
    Cao X; Liu S; Jia M; Chen H; Zhao D; Dong B; Guo Z; Ren L; Zhang S; Sun X
    Anal Cell Pathol (Amst); 2019; 2019():4324710. PubMed ID: 31934532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples.
    Song F; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Wu R;
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234518. PubMed ID: 32525936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical Precancer and Cancer Risk by Human Papillomavirus Status and Cytologic Interpretation: Implications for Risk-Based Management.
    Castle PE; Aslam S; Behrens C
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Dec; 25(12):1595-1599. PubMed ID: 27587789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.