These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33006852)
1. Method agreement between three different chambers for comparative bull semen computer assisted sperm motility analysis. Basioura A; Tsousis G; Boscos C; Lymberopoulos A; Tsakmakidis I Pol J Vet Sci; 2020 Sep; 23(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 33006852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Method agreement between three different chambers for comparative boar semen computer-assisted sperm analysis. Basioura A; Tsousis G; Boscos C; Lymberopoulos A; Tsakmakidis I Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Oct; 54 Suppl 4():41-45. PubMed ID: 31232479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of computer-assisted sperm analysis and smartphone-applied sperm analysis for evaluation of frozen-thawed bull semen. Baştan İ Reprod Domest Anim; 2024 Aug; 59(8):e14695. PubMed ID: 39109457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of commercially available chamber slides for computer-aided analysis of human sperm. Dardmeh F; Heidari M; Alipour H Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2021 Apr; 67(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 33375858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of chamber type integrated with computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) system on the results of boar semen evaluation. Gączarzewicz D Pol J Vet Sci; 2015; 18(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 26812825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal frame rate when there were stallion sperm motility evaluations and determinations for kinematic variables using CASA-Mot analysis in different counting chambers. Gacem S; Bompart D; Valverde A; Catalán J; Miró J; Soler C Anim Reprod Sci; 2020 Dec; 223():106643. PubMed ID: 33157363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in CASA output according to the chamber type when analyzing frozen-thawed bull sperm. Ibănescu I; Leiding C; Ciornei ŞG; Roșca P; Sfartz I; Drugociu D Anim Reprod Sci; 2016 Mar; 166():72-9. PubMed ID: 26791331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Influence of different filling method-related sperm counting chambers and structural factors of disposable chambers on sperm motility]. Zheng LJ; Zhang JW; Peng YY; Wang HL; Zhou XM; Wang W Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2021 Nov; 27(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 37422871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Which fields under a coverslip should one assess to estimate sperm motility? Nöthling JO; dos Santos IP Theriogenology; 2012 May; 77(8):1686-97. PubMed ID: 22341712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of semen preparation on casa motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa. Contri A; Valorz C; Faustini M; Wegher L; Carluccio A Theriogenology; 2010 Aug; 74(3):424-35. PubMed ID: 20451996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis. Hoogewijs MK; de Vliegher SP; Govaere JL; de Schauwer C; de Kruif A; van Soom A Equine Vet J; 2012 Sep; 44(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 22150933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of sperm subpopulations with defined motility characteristics in ejaculates from Holstein bulls: effects of cryopreservation and between-bull variation. Muiño R; Tamargo C; Hidalgo CO; Peña AI Anim Reprod Sci; 2008 Dec; 109(1-4):27-39. PubMed ID: 18036750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of the chamber on kinetic results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa. Gloria A; Carluccio A; Contri A; Wegher L; Valorz C; Robbe D Andrology; 2013 Nov; 1(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 23996954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of bovine seminal quality assessments using different viewing chambers with a computer-assisted semen analyzer. Lenz RW; Kjelland ME; Vonderhaar K; Swannack TM; Moreno JF J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 20952528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementing an open-access CASA software for the assessment of stallion sperm motility: Relationship with other sperm quality parameters. Giaretta E; Munerato M; Yeste M; Galeati G; Spinaci M; Tamanini C; Mari G; Bucci D Anim Reprod Sci; 2017 Jan; 176():11-19. PubMed ID: 27887759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of chamber characteristics, loading and analysis time on motility and kinetic variables analysed with the CASA-mot system in goat sperm. Del Gallego R; Sadeghi S; Blasco E; Soler C; Yániz JL; Silvestre MA Anim Reprod Sci; 2017 Feb; 177():97-104. PubMed ID: 28063626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Internal quality control products for computer-assisted sperm analysis: Research and application]. Ma M; Zhang N; Hao DM; Bo L; Yu YX Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2020 Nov; 26(10):895-899. PubMed ID: 33382220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CASA as an aid to selecting sperm suspensions for artificial insemination in Callithrix jacchus. Morrell JM Int J Androl; 1997 Oct; 20(5):287-96. PubMed ID: 16130273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of different counting chambers using a computer-assisted semen analyzer. Peng N; Zou X; Li L Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2015; 61(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 26214093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]