230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33007688)
1. A validation study of the use of smartphones and wrist-worn ActiGraphs to measure physical activity at different levels of intensity and step rates in older people.
Kwan RYC; Liu JYW; Lee D; Tse CYA; Lee PH
Gait Posture; 2020 Oct; 82():306-312. PubMed ID: 33007688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.
Sjöberg V; Westergren J; Monnier A; Lo Martire R; Hagströmer M; Äng BO; Vixner L
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Calibration of wrist-worn ActiWatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X for assessment of physical activity in young adults.
Lee P; Tse CY
Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():141-149. PubMed ID: 30476691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of activity trackers, smartphones, and phone applications to measure steps in various walking conditions.
Höchsmann C; Knaier R; Eymann J; Hintermann J; Infanger D; Schmidt-Trucksäss A
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2018 Jul; 28(7):1818-1827. PubMed ID: 29460319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.
Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA
J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wrist Accelerometer Cut Points for Classifying Sedentary Behavior in Children.
VAN Loo CM; Okely AD; Batterham MJ; Hinkley T; Ekelund U; Brage S; Reilly JJ; Trost SG; Jones RA; Janssen X; Cliff DP
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Apr; 49(4):813-822. PubMed ID: 27851669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Children's physical activity assessed with wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers.
Rowlands AV; Rennie K; Kozarski R; Stanley RM; Eston RG; Parfitt GC; Olds TS
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Dec; 46(12):2308-16. PubMed ID: 24781890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calibration of the GENEA accelerometer for assessment of physical activity intensity in children.
Phillips LR; Parfitt G; Rowlands AV
J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Mar; 16(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 22770768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Personalised Accelerometer Cut-point Prediction for Older Adults' Movement Behaviours using a Machine Learning approach.
Nnamoko N; Cabrera-Diego LA; Campbell D; Sanders G; Fairclough SJ; Korkontzelos I
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 208():106165. PubMed ID: 34118492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.
Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do wearable fitness devices correlate with performance-based tests of work-related functional capacity?
Karpman J; Gross DP; Manns P; Tomkins-Lane C
Work; 2020; 66(1):201-211. PubMed ID: 32417827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of Physical Activity Intensity in Spinal Cord Injury Using a Wrist-Worn ActiGraph Monitor.
Veerubhotla A; Hong E; Knezevic S; Spungen A; Ding D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Sep; 101(9):1563-1569. PubMed ID: 32502566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparability of children's sedentary time estimates derived from wrist worn GENEActiv and hip worn ActiGraph accelerometer thresholds.
Boddy LM; Noonan RJ; Kim Y; Rowlands AV; Welk GJ; Knowles ZR; Fairclough SJ
J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1045-1049. PubMed ID: 29650338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring moderate-intensity walking in older adults using the ActiGraph accelerometer.
Barnett A; van den Hoek D; Barnett D; Cerin E
BMC Geriatr; 2016 Dec; 16(1):211. PubMed ID: 27931188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A catalog of validity indices for step counting wearable technologies during treadmill walking: the CADENCE-Kids study.
Gould ZR; Mora-Gonzalez J; Aguiar EJ; Schuna JM; Barreira TV; Moore CC; Staudenmayer J; Tudor-Locke C
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2021 Jul; 18(1):97. PubMed ID: 34271922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-generational comparability of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+, wGT3X-BT, and GT9X accelerometers during free-living in adults.
Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Montoye AHK
J Sports Sci; 2020 Dec; 38(24):2794-2802. PubMed ID: 32755446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wrist-based accelerometer cut-points for quantifying moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity in Parkinson's disease.
Jeng B; Cederberg KLJ; Lai B; Sasaki JE; Bamman MM; Motl RW
Gait Posture; 2022 Jan; 91():235-239. PubMed ID: 34749075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of the Polar M430 Activity Monitor in Free-Living Conditions: Validation Study.
Henriksen A; Grimsgaard S; Horsch A; Hartvigsen G; Hopstock L
JMIR Form Res; 2019 Aug; 3(3):e14438. PubMed ID: 31420958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Fitbit Charge 2 compared to the ActiGraph GT3X+ in older adults with knee osteoarthritis in free-living conditions.
Collins JE; Yang HY; Trentadue TP; Gong Y; Losina E
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211231. PubMed ID: 30699159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Wrist Accelerometer Cut-Points for Classifying Physical Activity Intensity in Youth.
Trost SG; Brookes DSK; Ahmadi MN
Front Digit Health; 2022; 4():884307. PubMed ID: 35585912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
