230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33007688)
21. Estimating Sedentary Time from a Hip- and Wrist-Worn Accelerometer.
Marcotte RT; Petrucci GJ; Cox MF; Freedson PS; Staudenmayer JW; Sirard JR
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2020 Jan; 52(1):225-232. PubMed ID: 31343523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy and precision of wrist-worn actigraphy for measuring steps taken during over-ground and treadmill walking in adults with Parkinson's disease.
Cederberg KLJ; Jeng B; Sasaki JE; Lai B; Bamman M; Motl RW
Parkinsonism Relat Disord; 2021 Jul; 88():102-107. PubMed ID: 34171566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparing accelerometer, pedometer and a questionnaire for measuring physical activity in bronchiectasis: a validity and feasibility study?
O'Neill B; McDonough SM; Wilson JJ; Bradbury I; Hayes K; Kirk A; Kent L; Cosgrove D; Bradley JM; Tully MA
Respir Res; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28088206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Generation and validation of ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer cut-points for assessing physical activity intensity in older adults. The OUTDOOR ACTIVE validation study.
Bammann K; Thomson NK; Albrecht BM; Buchan DS; Easton C
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252615. PubMed ID: 34081715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validity and comparability of a wrist-worn accelerometer in children.
Ekblom O; Nyberg G; Bak EE; Ekelund U; Marcus C
J Phys Act Health; 2012 Mar; 9(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 22454440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cut points of the Actigraph GT9X for moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity at four different wear locations.
Rhudy MB; Dreisbach SB; Moran MD; Ruggiero MJ; Veerabhadrappa P
J Sports Sci; 2020 Mar; 38(5):503-510. PubMed ID: 31865845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Actigraph GT3X: validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points.
Santos-Lozano A; Santín-Medeiros F; Cardon G; Torres-Luque G; Bailón R; Bergmeir C; Ruiz JR; Lucia A; Garatachea N
Int J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 34(11):975-82. PubMed ID: 23700330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reliability of ActiGraph GT3X+ placement location in the estimation of energy expenditure during moderate and high-intensity physical activities in young and older adults.
Kossi O; Lacroix J; Ferry B; Batcho CS; Julien-Vergonjanne A; Mandigout S
J Sports Sci; 2021 Jul; 39(13):1489-1496. PubMed ID: 33514289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Google fit smartphone application or Gt3X Actigraph: Which is better for detecting the stepping activity of individuals with stroke? A validity study.
Polese JC; E Faria GS; Ribeiro-Samora GA; Lima LP; Coelho de Morais Faria CD; Scianni AA; Teixeira-Salmela LF
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2019 Jul; 23(3):461-465. PubMed ID: 31563356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Criterion-Related Validity of Consumer-Wearable Activity Trackers for Estimating Steps in Primary Schoolchildren under Controlled Conditions: Fit-Person Study.
Mayorga-Vega D; Casado-Robles C; Guijarro-Romero S; Viciana J
J Sports Sci Med; 2024 Mar; 23(1):79-96. PubMed ID: 38455433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Step Count Assessed Using Wrist- and Hip-Worn Actigraph GT3X in Free-Living Conditions in Young and Older Adults.
Mandigout S; Lacroix J; Perrochon A; Svoboda Z; Aubourg T; Vuillerme N
Front Med (Lausanne); 2019; 6():252. PubMed ID: 31828072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Wrist-based cut-points for moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity for the Actical accelerometer in adults.
Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Kronish IM; Moise N; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE
J Sports Sci; 2018 Jan; 36(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 28282744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison Between Wrist-Worn and Waist-Worn Accelerometry.
Loprinzi PD; Smith B
J Phys Act Health; 2017 Jul; 14(7):539-545. PubMed ID: 28290761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Calibrating Wrist-Worn Accelerometers for Physical Activity Assessment in Preschoolers: Machine Learning Approaches.
Li S; Howard JT; Sosa ET; Cordova A; Parra-Medina D; Yin Z
JMIR Form Res; 2020 Aug; 4(8):e16727. PubMed ID: 32667893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Calibration and Cross-Validation of the ActiGraph wGT3X+ Accelerometer for the Estimation of Physical Activity Intensity in Children with Intellectual Disabilities.
McGarty AM; Penpraze V; Melville CA
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164928. PubMed ID: 27760219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validation of Physical Activity Tracking via Android Smartphones Compared to ActiGraph Accelerometer: Laboratory-Based and Free-Living Validation Studies.
Hekler EB; Buman MP; Grieco L; Rosenberger M; Winter SJ; Haskell W; King AC
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2015 Apr; 3(2):e36. PubMed ID: 25881662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A catalog of validity indices for step counting wearable technologies during treadmill walking: the CADENCE-adults study.
Mora-Gonzalez J; Gould ZR; Moore CC; Aguiar EJ; Ducharme SW; Schuna JM; Barreira TV; Staudenmayer J; McAvoy CR; Boikova M; Miller TA; Tudor-Locke C
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2022 Sep; 19(1):117. PubMed ID: 36076265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Validating the accuracy of an activity monitor in a visually impaired older population.
Bajaj R; Ramulu P; Dillon L; Jakobsen KB; Tiedemann A; Rogers K; Keay L
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Sep; 38(5):562-569. PubMed ID: 29984414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of step count measured by physical activity monitors: The effect of gait speed and anatomical placement site.
Chow JJ; Thom JM; Wewege MA; Ward RE; Parmenter BJ
Gait Posture; 2017 Sep; 57():199-203. PubMed ID: 28666177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy of steps measured by smartphones-based WeRun compared with ActiGraph-GT3X accelerometer in free-living conditions.
Yao Q; Wang J; Sun Y; Zhang L; Sun S; Cheng M; Yang Q; Wang S; Huang L; Lin T; Jia Y
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1009022. PubMed ID: 36582382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
