302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33008320)
1. Application of ultrasound artificial intelligence in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions of BI-RADS 4A.
Niu S; Huang J; Li J; Liu X; Wang D; Zhang R; Wang Y; Shen H; Qi M; Xiao Y; Guan M; Liu H; Li D; Liu F; Wang X; Xiong Y; Gao S; Wang X; Zhu J
BMC Cancer; 2020 Oct; 20(1):959. PubMed ID: 33008320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential diagnosis between small breast phyllodes tumors and fibroadenomas using artificial intelligence and ultrasound data.
Niu S; Huang J; Li J; Liu X; Wang D; Wang Y; Shen H; Qi M; Xiao Y; Guan M; Li D; Liu F; Wang X; Xiong Y; Gao S; Wang X; Yu P; Zhu J
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2021 May; 11(5):2052-2061. PubMed ID: 33936986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.
Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China.
Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Wang H; Luo BM; Guo SL; Zhou Q; Xue ES; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Wang HQ; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S26-S34. PubMed ID: 32768352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of combined BI-RADS analysis and Nakagami statistics of ultrasound echoes in the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Dobruch-Sobczak K; Piotrzkowska-Wróblewska H; Roszkowska-Purska K; Nowicki A; Jakubowski W
Clin Radiol; 2017 Apr; 72(4):339.e7-339.e15. PubMed ID: 28038779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency of Categories 4 and 5 of the Second Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Lesions.
Zou X; Wang J; Lan X; Lin Q; Han F; Liu L; Li A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2065-71. PubMed ID: 27262521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The uncertainty of boundary can improve the classification accuracy of BI-RADS 4A ultrasound image.
Wang H; Hu Y; Lu Y; Zhou J; Guo Y
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3314-3324. PubMed ID: 35261034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial intelligence for breast ultrasound: An adjunct tool to reduce excessive lesion biopsy.
Wang XY; Cui LG; Feng J; Chen W
Eur J Radiol; 2021 May; 138():109624. PubMed ID: 33706046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of Deep Learning to Reduce the Rate of Malignancy Among BI-RADS 4A Breast Lesions Based on Ultrasonography.
Zhao Z; Hou S; Li S; Sheng D; Liu Q; Chang C; Chen J; Li J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Nov; 48(11):2267-2275. PubMed ID: 36055860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The value of ultrasound classification in BI-RADS category 4 of breast complex cystic masses].
Yao JP; Niu LJ; Wang Y; Geng CY; Chang Q; Chen Y; Zhu L
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 40(9):672-675. PubMed ID: 30293391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Can artificial intelligence replace ultrasound as a complementary tool to mammogram for the diagnosis of the breast cancer?
Mansour S; Kamal R; Hashem L; AlKalaawy B
Br J Radiol; 2021 Dec; 94(1128):20210820. PubMed ID: 34613796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound strain elastography for differentiation of malignant breast lesions.
Georgieva M; Prantl L; Utpatel K; Wiesinger I; Stroszczynski C; Jung F; Jung EM
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 71(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 30584133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What Help Could Ultrasound Elastography Give to the Diagnosis of Breast Papillary Lesions?
Li LJ; Yao JY; Zhou XC; Zhao XB; Zhong WJ; Ou B; Luo BM; Hao SY; Zhi H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):903-910. PubMed ID: 28256344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of BI-RADS-US 4a lesions less than 2 cm in diameter.
Yu MQ; Zhang LL; Jiang LP; Zhou AY
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2023; 83(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 35599475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combination of different types of elastography in downgrading ultrasound Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System category 4a breast lesions.
Zheng X; Huang Y; Wang Y; Liu Y; Li F; Han J; Wang J; Cao L; Zhou J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Apr; 174(2):423-432. PubMed ID: 30515679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of contrast-enhanced malignancy imaging features in secondary grade diagnosis of BI-RADS-US type 4 breast lesions.
Gao J; Han W; Ai Si Mu Tu La DLMT; Hou X; Li ZM; Song T
Tumori; 2021 Oct; 107(5):424-431. PubMed ID: 33124515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Texture Analysis of Ultrasound Images to Differentiate Simple Fibroadenomas From Complex Fibroadenomas and Benign Phyllodes Tumors.
Basara Akin I; Ozgul H; Simsek K; Altay C; Secil M; Balci P
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Oct; 39(10):1993-2003. PubMed ID: 32329531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Diagnostic Value of 3D Power Doppler Ultrasound Combined With VOCAL in the Vascular Distribution of Breast Masses.
Wang H; Yan B; Yue L; He M; Liu Y; Li H
Acad Radiol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 31053481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
