292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33008649)
21. Tailoring the size distribution of ultrasound contrast agents: possible method for improving sensitivity in molecular imaging.
Talu E; Hettiarachchi K; Zhao S; Powell RL; Lee AP; Longo ML; Dayton PA
Mol Imaging; 2007; 6(6):384-92. PubMed ID: 18053409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation.
Daeichin V; van Rooij T; Skachkov I; Ergin B; Specht PA; Lima A; Ince C; Bosch JG; van der Steen AF; de Jong N; Kooiman K
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Mar; 64(3):555-567. PubMed ID: 28113312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Formation of Microbubbles for Targeted Ultrasound Contrast Imaging: Practical Translation Considerations.
Unnikrishnan S; Du Z; Diakova GB; Klibanov AL
Langmuir; 2019 Aug; 35(31):10034-10041. PubMed ID: 30509068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Stability of Monodisperse Phospholipid-Coated Microbubbles Formed by Flow-Focusing at High Production Rates.
Segers T; de Rond L; de Jong N; Borden M; Versluis M
Langmuir; 2016 Apr; 32(16):3937-44. PubMed ID: 27006083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Characteristics and Echogenicity of Clinical Ultrasound Contrast Agents: An In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison Study.
Hyvelin JM; Gaud E; Costa M; Helbert A; Bussat P; Bettinger T; Frinking P
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 May; 36(5):941-953. PubMed ID: 28240842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optimisation of the transmit beam parameters for generation of subharmonic signals in native and altered populations of a commercial microbubble contrast agent SonoVue®.
Ivory AM; Meaney JF; Fagan AJ; Browne JE
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():176-183. PubMed ID: 32036334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Nanobubbles are Non-Echogenic for Fundamental-Mode Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.
Myers JZ; Navarro-Becerra JA; Borden MA
Bioconjug Chem; 2022 Jun; 33(6):1106-1113. PubMed ID: 35476906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Freeze-Dried Microfluidic Monodisperse Microbubbles as a New Generation of Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
Soysal U; Azevedo PN; Bureau F; Aubry A; Carvalho MS; Pessoa ACSN; Torre LG; Couture O; Tourin A; Fink M; Tabeling P
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Aug; 48(8):1484-1495. PubMed ID: 35568594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Can monodisperse microbubble-based three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound reduce quantitative heterogeneity? An in vitro study.
Zheng Q; Ruan SM; Zhang CY; Cao Z; Huang ZR; Guo HL; Xie XY; Lu MD; Wang W; Chen LD
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2022 Mar; 31(3):307-315. PubMed ID: 34856079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Imaging with ultrasound contrast agents: current status and future.
Chong WK; Papadopoulou V; Dayton PA
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Apr; 43(4):762-772. PubMed ID: 29508011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Transfection effect of microbubbles on cells in superposed ultrasound waves and behavior of cavitation bubble.
Kodama T; Tomita Y; Koshiyama K; Blomley MJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 32(6):905-14. PubMed ID: 16785012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Role of Microbubble Echo Phase Lag in Multipulse Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.
Tremblay-Darveau C; Sheeran PS; Vu CK; Williams R; Zhang Z; Bruce M; Burns PN
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Aug; 65(8):1389-1401. PubMed ID: 29993575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of microbubble size on fundamental mode high frequency ultrasound imaging in mice.
Sirsi S; Feshitan J; Kwan J; Homma S; Borden M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 36(6):935-48. PubMed ID: 20447755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Microbubble oscillating in a microvessel filled with viscous fluid: A finite element modeling study.
Chen C; Gu Y; Tu J; Guo X; Zhang D
Ultrasonics; 2016 Mar; 66():54-64. PubMed ID: 26651263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Microbubble characterization through acoustically induced deflation.
Guidi F; Vos HJ; Mori R; de Jong N; Tortoli P
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Jan; 57(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 20040446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bubble sorting in pinched microchannels for ultrasound contrast agent enrichment.
Kok MP; Segers T; Versluis M
Lab Chip; 2015; 15(18):3716-22. PubMed ID: 26223966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Synthesis of laboratory Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
Park J; Park D; Shin U; Moon S; Kim C; Kim HS; Park H; Choi K; Jung B; Oh J; Seo J
Molecules; 2013 Oct; 18(10):13078-95. PubMed ID: 24152677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Experimental acoustic characterization of an endoskeletal antibubble contrast agent: First results.
Panfilova A; Chen P; van Sloun RJG; Wijkstra H; Postema M; Poortinga AT; Mischi M
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6765-6780. PubMed ID: 34580883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The polydisperse acoustic signature of rigid microbubbles.
Dermitzakis A; Butler MB; Thomas DH; Sboros V
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():133-6. PubMed ID: 26736218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. 20 years of ultrasound contrast agent modeling.
Faez T; Emmer M; Kooiman K; Versluis M; van der Steen A; de Jong N
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jan; 60(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 23287909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
