These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33009264)

  • 1. Impact of a Web-Based Decisional Aid on Satisfaction in Women Undergoing Prolapse Surgery.
    Collins SA; Mueller MG; Geynisman-Tan J; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Kenton K
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):e309-e314. PubMed ID: 33009264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient satisfaction and regret with decision differ between outcomes in the composite definition of success after reconstructive surgery.
    Khoder W; Hom E; Guanzon A; Rose S; Hale D; Heit M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Apr; 28(4):613-620. PubMed ID: 27738734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Obliterative Surgery for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Patient Survey on Reasons for Surgery Selection and Postoperative Decision Regret and Satisfaction.
    Takase-Sanchez MM; Brooks HM; Hale DS; Heit MH
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(6):325-31. PubMed ID: 26506160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Body Image, Regret, and Satisfaction 24 Weeks After Colpocleisis: A Multicenter Study.
    Crisp CC; Book NM; Cunkelman JA; Tieu AL; Pauls RN;
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(3):132-5. PubMed ID: 26571434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Satisfaction and Regret Following Uterosacral Ligament Suspension and Sacrocolpopexy: A Prospective Multicenter Analysis From the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network.
    Bastawros D; Rabon H; Noor N; Florian-Rodriguez ME; Hobson D; Tarr ME
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):e70-e74. PubMed ID: 32520744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pelvic Symptoms, Body Image, and Regret after LeFort Colpocleisis: A Long-Term Follow-Up.
    Wang X; Chen Y; Hua K
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):415-419. PubMed ID: 28027972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Body image, regret, and satisfaction following colpocleisis.
    Crisp CC; Book NM; Smith AL; Cunkelman JA; Mishan V; Treszezamsky AD; Adams SR; Apostolis C; Lowenstein L; Pauls RN;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 209(5):473.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23665244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term follow-up after LeFort colpocleisis: patient satisfaction, regret rate, and pelvic symptoms.
    Song X; Zhu L; Ding J; Xu T; Lang J
    Menopause; 2016 Jun; 23(6):621-5. PubMed ID: 26978714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of a New Risk Calculator on Patient Satisfaction With the Decision for Concomitant Midurethral Sling During Prolapse Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Miranne JM; Gutman RE; Sokol AI; Park AJ; Iglesia CB
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 27682745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination Ba and D Guide the Selection of Operation for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse?
    Li C; Shu H; Dai Z
    J Invest Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):438-445. PubMed ID: 30574821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
    Geoffrion R; Larouche M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of pelvic organ prolapse repair on urinary symptoms: a comparative study between the laparoscopic and vaginal approach.
    Ramanah R; Ballester M; Chereau E; Rouzier R; Daraï E
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2012 Jan; 31(1):126-31. PubMed ID: 21953628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review comparing different approaches to pelvic floor repair.
    Antosh DD; Dieter AA; Balk EM; Kanter G; Kim-Fine S; Meriwether KV; Mamik MM; Good MM; Singh R; Alas A; Foda MA; Rahn DD; Rogers RG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):475.e1-475.e19. PubMed ID: 34087227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh for severe pelvic organ prolapse.
    Zhu L; Sun Z; Yu M; Li B; Li X; Lang J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 May; 121(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 23415023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
    J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
    Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
    Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.