These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33009429)

  • 1. Use of artificial intelligence to recover mandibular morphology after disease.
    Liang Y; Huan J; Li JD; Jiang C; Fang C; Liu Y
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16431. PubMed ID: 33009429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomical landmarks of mandibular interforaminal region related to dental implant placement with 3D CBCT: comparison between edentulous and dental mandibles.
    Sener E; Onem E; Akar GC; Govsa F; Ozer MA; Pinar Y; Mert A; Baksi Sen BG
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Jun; 40(6):615-623. PubMed ID: 29124343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Condylar and mandibular morphological criteria in the 2D and 3D MSCT imaging for patients with Class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion.
    Krisjane Z; Urtane I; Krumina G; Bieza A; Zepa K; Rogovska I
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(3):67-71. PubMed ID: 17993738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic segmentation of the mandible from computed tomography scans for 3D virtual surgical planning using the convolutional neural network.
    Qiu B; Guo J; Kraeima J; Glas HH; Borra RJH; Witjes MJH; van Ooijen PMA
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 64(17):175020. PubMed ID: 31239411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prevalence and Morphology of Mandibular Incisive Canal: Comparison among Healthy, Periodontitis and Edentulous Mandibles in a Population of the Beijing Area Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
    Zhang YQ; Yan XB; Zhang LQ; Xie XY; Liu DG; Zhang ZY
    Chin J Dent Res; 2019; 22(4):241-249. PubMed ID: 31859284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomical characteristics of the mandibular lingual foramina observed on limited cone-beam CT images.
    Katakami K; Mishima A; Kuribayashi A; Shimoda S; Hamada Y; Kobayashi K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 19298292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. To Assess and Evaluate the Variation of Mandibular Anatomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Before Planning an Implant Surgery: A Population-based Retrospective Study.
    Kapoor V; Kumar N; Dahiya K; Sikka R; Sirana P; Singh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1381-1385. PubMed ID: 30602645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.
    Hanazawa T; Sano T; Seki K; Okano T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel measurement method for the morphology of the mandibular ramus using homologous modelling.
    Inoue K; Nakano H; Sumida T; Yamada T; Otawa N; Fukuda N; Nakajima Y; Kumamaru W; Mishima K; Kouchi M; Takahashi I; Mori Y
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150062. PubMed ID: 26143939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Novel Method for Observation of the Mandibular Foramen: Application to a Better Understanding of Dental Anatomy.
    Iwanaga J; Watanabe K; Saga T; Tubbs RS; Tanaka K; Kikuta S; Tabira Y; Fisahn C; Kamura Y; Kusukawa J; Yamaki KI
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2017 Oct; 300(10):1875-1880. PubMed ID: 28681490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphological assessment of the mandibular canal trajectory in edentate subjects.
    Nimigean V; Sîrbu VD; Nimigean VR; Bădiţă DG; Poll A; Moraru SA; Păun DL
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2018; 59(1):235-242. PubMed ID: 29940633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Morphological evaluation of the mandibular lingula using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Senel B; Ozkan A; Altug HA
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2015; 74(4):497-502. PubMed ID: 26620512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on multi-slice and cone beam computed tomography scans to detect the mandibular canal during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible.
    Freire-Maia B; Machado VD; Valerio CS; Custódio AL; Manzi FR; Junqueira JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Mar; 46(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 27939592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planning of mandibular reconstructions based on statistical shape models.
    Raith S; Wolff S; Steiner T; Modabber A; Weber M; Hölzle F; Fischer H
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 27393280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deep Learning Method for Mandibular Canal Segmentation in Dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography Volumes.
    Jaskari J; Sahlsten J; Järnstedt J; Mehtonen H; Karhu K; Sundqvist O; Hietanen A; Varjonen V; Mattila V; Kaski K
    Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):5842. PubMed ID: 32245989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A deep-learning artificial intelligence system for assessment of root morphology of the mandibular first molar on panoramic radiography.
    Hiraiwa T; Ariji Y; Fukuda M; Kise Y; Nakata K; Katsumata A; Fujita H; Ariji E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Mar; 48(3):20180218. PubMed ID: 30379570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional vector analysis of mandibular structural asymmetry.
    Park KR; Park HS; Piao Z; Kim MK; Yu HS; Seo JK; Lee SH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 41(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 23347884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anatomy of the mandibular canal and surrounding structures. Part II: Cancellous pattern of the mandible.
    Iwanaga J; Shiromoto K; Kato T; Tanaka T; Ibaragi S; Tubbs RS
    Ann Anat; 2020 Nov; 232():151583. PubMed ID: 32810613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morphometric analysis of the mandible of ram and ewe romanov sheep (Ovis aries) with 3D modelling: A CT study.
    İşbilir F; Güzel BC
    Anat Histol Embryol; 2023 Sep; 52(5):742-751. PubMed ID: 37158331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.