These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33009756)

  • 1. Clinical Negative Pressure Measurement after Border Molding Procedure.
    Shopova DA; Slavchev D
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2020 Sep; 62(3):578-584. PubMed ID: 33009756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory investigation of Accuracy of Impression Materials for Border Molding.
    Shopova D; Slavchev D
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2019 Sep; 61(3):435-443. PubMed ID: 32337931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Open-face custom tray for edentulous obturator impression.
    Zaki HS; Aramany MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jun; 45(6):639-42. PubMed ID: 7017113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation and Comparison of the Effect of Different Border Molding Materials on Complete Denture Retention: An in vivo Study.
    Pachar RB; Singla Y; Kumar P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):982-987. PubMed ID: 30150501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An alternative impression technique for complete dentures.
    Yilmaz B; Özçelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 24286641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of border molding, using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches - An in vivo study.
    Yarapatineni R; Vilekar A; Kumar JP; Kumar GA; Aravind P; Kumar PA
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Dec; 5(6):82-7. PubMed ID: 24453450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Computer aided design and 3-dimensional printing for the production of custom trays of maxillary edentulous jaws based on 3-dimensional scan of primary impression].
    Chen H; Zhao T; Wang Y; Sun YC
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Oct; 48(5):900-904. PubMed ID: 27752178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Establishment and preliminary clinical evaluation of edentulous custom trays designed and fabricated by chair-side CAD and 3D printing systems].
    Wang KP; Ye HQ; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhou YS
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Apr; 51(2):349-355. PubMed ID: 30996381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complete mucostatic impression: a new attempt.
    Bindhoo YA; Thirumurthy VR; Kurien A
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 22356157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changing the bonding force of impression tray to edentulous maxillary jaw simulator with impression valve system: in vitro study.
    Akpinar YZ; Yilmaz B; Tatar N; Demirtag Z
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 25511355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pressure generated on a simulated mandibular oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different design.
    Al-Ahmad A; Masri R; Driscoll CF; von Fraunhofer J; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 16650009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On Comparing Two Different Tray-Holding Techniques for Edentulous Maxillary Impressions.
    Rignon-Bret C; Mushegyan V; Naveau A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 26929958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A selective-pressure impression technique for the edentulous maxilla.
    Duncan JP; Raghavendra S; Taylor TD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):299-301. PubMed ID: 15343168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In silico evaluation of the peripheral and inner seals in complete denture master impressions using a custom-developed 3D software.
    Kalberer N; Chebib N; Wachter W; Lee H; Müller F; Srinivasan M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jan; 25(1):125-132. PubMed ID: 32488486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of relief space and escape holes on pressure characteristics of maxillary edentulous impressions.
    Komiyama O; Saeki H; Kawara M; Kobayashi K; Otake S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):570-6. PubMed ID: 15211300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo evaluation of the impact of various border molding materials and techniques on the retention of complete maxillary dentures.
    Jassim TK; Kareem AE; Alloaibi MA
    Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(2):191-196. PubMed ID: 32649808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Edentulous jaw impression techniques: An in vivo comparison of trueness.
    Chebib N; Kalberer N; Srinivasan M; Maniewicz S; Perneger T; Müller F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):623-630. PubMed ID: 30580982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A technique for border molding edentulous impressions using vinyl polysiloxane material.
    Chaffee NR; Cooper LF; Felton DA
    J Prosthodont; 1999 Jun; 8(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 10740512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influences of differences in tray design and impression material on impression pressure at edentulous mandible.
    Inoue S; Kawara M; Iida T; Iwasaki M; Komiyama O
    J Oral Sci; 2017 Dec; 59(4):505-510. PubMed ID: 28855443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.