These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33009915)

  • 1. Early posterior negativity in humans to pictures of snakes and spiders: effects of proximity.
    Beligiannis N; Van Strien JW
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Dec; 238(12):2795-2804. PubMed ID: 33009915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Both low and high spatial frequencies drive the early posterior negativity in response to snake stimuli.
    Beligiannis N; Hermus M; Gootjes L; Van Strien JW
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Dec; 177():108403. PubMed ID: 36332696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blurring attenuates the early posterior negativity in response to snake stimuli.
    Beligiannis N; Van Strien JW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():201-207. PubMed ID: 31669318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing the snake-detection hypothesis: larger early posterior negativity in humans to pictures of snakes than to pictures of other reptiles, spiders and slugs.
    Van Strien JW; Franken IH; Huijding J
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():691. PubMed ID: 25237303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Snake pictures draw more early attention than spider pictures in non-phobic women: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Van Strien JW; Eijlers R; Franken IH; Huijding J
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Feb; 96():150-7. PubMed ID: 24374241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spiders do not evoke greater early posterior negativity in the event-related potential as snakes.
    He H; Kubo K; Kawai N
    Neuroreport; 2014 Sep; 25(13):1049-53. PubMed ID: 25026534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Curvilinear shapes and the snake detection hypothesis: An ERP study.
    Van Strien JW; Christiaans G; Franken IH; Huijding J
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 26481589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced early visual processing in response to snake and trypophobic stimuli.
    Van Strien JW; Van der Peijl MK
    BMC Psychol; 2018 May; 6(1):21. PubMed ID: 29720255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive reappraisal of snake and spider pictures: An event-related potentials study.
    Langeslag SJE; van Strien JW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Aug; 130():1-8. PubMed ID: 29859220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Snake scales, partial exposure, and the Snake Detection Theory: A human event-related potentials study.
    Van Strien JW; Isbell LA
    Sci Rep; 2017 Apr; 7():46331. PubMed ID: 28387376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phobic spider fear is associated with enhanced attentional capture by spider pictures: a rapid serial presentation event-related potential study.
    Van Strien JW; Franken IH; Huijding J
    Neuroreport; 2009 Mar; 20(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 19218869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of attention manipulations on motivated attention to feared and nonfeared negative distracters in spider fear.
    Norberg J; Wiens S
    BMC Neurosci; 2013 Nov; 14():139. PubMed ID: 24207058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pattern matters: Snakes exhibiting triangular and diamond-shaped skin patterns modulate electrophysiological activity in human visual cortex.
    Grassini S; Valli K; Souchet J; Aubret F; Segurini GV; Revonsuo A; Koivisto M
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Aug; 131():62-72. PubMed ID: 31153966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Who is afraid of the invisible snake? Subjective visual awareness modulates posterior brain activity for evolutionarily threatening stimuli.
    Grassini S; Holm SK; Railo H; Koivisto M
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):53-61. PubMed ID: 27760371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brain dynamics of visual attention during anticipation and encoding of threat- and safe-cues in spider-phobic individuals.
    Michalowski JM; Pané-Farré CA; Löw A; Hamm AO
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 10(9):1177-86. PubMed ID: 25608985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual features and perceptual context modulate attention towards evolutionarily relevant threatening stimuli: Electrophysiological evidence.
    Grassini S; Railo H; Valli K; Revonsuo A; Koivisto M
    Emotion; 2019 Mar; 19(2):348-364. PubMed ID: 29578746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) quickly detect snakes but not spiders: Evolutionary origins of fear-relevant animals.
    Kawai N; Koda H
    J Comp Psychol; 2016 Aug; 130(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 27078076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The lurking snake in the grass: interference of snake stimuli in visually taxing conditions.
    Soares SC
    Evol Psychol; 2012 Apr; 10(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 22947633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brain dynamics in spider-phobic individuals exposed to phobia-relevant and other emotional stimuli.
    Michalowski JM; Melzig CA; Weike AI; Stockburger J; Schupp HT; Hamm AO
    Emotion; 2009 Jun; 9(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 19485608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expectancy and attention bias to spiders: Dissecting anticipation and allocation processes using ERPs.
    Abado E; Aue T; Pourtois G; Okon-Singer H
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Jun; 61(6):e14546. PubMed ID: 38406863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.