193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33010161)
1. Recommended Definitions of Aggressive Prostate Cancer for Etiologic Epidemiologic Research.
Hurwitz LM; Agalliu I; Albanes D; Barry KH; Berndt SI; Cai Q; Chen C; Cheng I; Genkinger JM; Giles GG; Huang J; Joshu CE; Key TJ; Knutsen S; Koutros S; Langseth H; Li SX; MacInnis RJ; Markt SC; Penney KL; Perez-Cornago A; Rohan TE; Smith-Warner SA; Stampfer MJ; Stopsack KH; Tangen CM; Travis RC; Weinstein SJ; Lang PhD W; Jacobs EJ; Mucci LA; Platz EA; Cook MB;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 Jun; 113(6):727-734. PubMed ID: 33010161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applying recommended definition of aggressive prostate cancer: a validation study using high-quality data from the Cancer Registry of Norway.
Robsahm TE; Tsuruda KM; Hektoen HH; Storås AH; Cook MB; Hurwitz LM; Langseth H
Acta Oncol; 2023 Jan; 62(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 36762472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Defining aggressive prostate cancer: a geospatial perspective.
Wiese D; DuBois TD; Sorice KA; Fang CY; Ragin C; Daly MB; Reese AC; Henry KA; Lynch SM
BMC Cancer; 2023 Aug; 23(1):754. PubMed ID: 37580675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence and Predictors of Upgrading and Up Staging among 10,000 Contemporary Patients with Low Risk Prostate Cancer.
Dinh KT; Mahal BA; Ziehr DR; Muralidhar V; Chen YW; Viswanathan VB; Nezolosky MD; Beard CJ; Choueiri TK; Martin NE; Orio PF; Sweeney CJ; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):343-9. PubMed ID: 25681290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of an Aggressive Prostate Biopsy Strategy in Men Younger than 50 Years.
Goldberg H; Klaassen Z; Chandrasekar T; Wallis CJD; Toi A; Sayyid R; Bhindi B; Nesbitt M; Evans A; van der Kwast T; Sweet J; Perlis N; Hamilton RJ; Kulkarni GS; Finelli A; Zlotta A; Fleshner N
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1056-1061. PubMed ID: 29758220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of [-2]proPSA versus Gleason score and Prostate Health Index versus Gleason score for the determination of aggressive prostate cancer: a systematic review.
Anyango R; Ojwando J; Mwita C; Mugalo E
JBI Evid Synth; 2021 Jun; 19(6):1263-1291. PubMed ID: 33741840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting.
Hansen NL; Barrett T; Koo B; Doble A; Gnanapragasam V; Warren A; Kastner C; Bratt O
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):724-730. PubMed ID: 27488931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A 17-gene assay to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in the context of Gleason grade heterogeneity, tumor multifocality, and biopsy undersampling.
Klein EA; Cooperberg MR; Magi-Galluzzi C; Simko JP; Falzarano SM; Maddala T; Chan JM; Li J; Cowan JE; Tsiatis AC; Cherbavaz DB; Pelham RJ; Tenggara-Hunter I; Baehner FL; Knezevic D; Febbo PG; Shak S; Kattan MW; Lee M; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):550-60. PubMed ID: 24836057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Baseline Prostate-specific Antigen Level in Midlife and Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Black Men.
Preston MA; Gerke T; Carlsson SV; Signorello L; Sjoberg DD; Markt SC; Kibel AS; Trinh QD; Steinwandel M; Blot W; Vickers AJ; Lilja H; Mucci LA; Wilson KM
Eur Urol; 2019 Mar; 75(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 30237027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Critical assessment of prebiopsy parameters for predicting prostate cancer metastasis and mortality.
van Leeuwen PJ; van den Bergh RC; Wolters T; Zhu X; Bul M; Schröder FH; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6018-24. PubMed ID: 22166329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and Validation of a Lookup Table for the Prediction of Metastatic Prostate Cancer According to Prostatic-specific Antigen Value, Clinical Tumor Stage, and Gleason Grade Groups.
Preisser F; Bandini M; Nazzani S; Mazzone E; Marchioni M; Tian Z; Chun FKH; Saad F; Briganti A; Haese A; Montorsi F; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 3(5):631-639. PubMed ID: 31411975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinicopathologic features and determinants of Gleason score of prostate cancer in Ghanaian men.
Yarney J; Vanderpuye V; Mensah J
Urol Oncol; 2013 Apr; 31(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 21441045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards an optimal interval for prostate cancer screening.
van Leeuwen PJ; Roobol MJ; Kranse R; Zappa M; Carlsson S; Bul M; Zhu X; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Hugosson J
Eur Urol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 21840117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The U Shape of Prostate-specific Antigen and Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality in High-grade Metastatic Prostate Adenocarcinoma.
Wang J; Abudurexiti M; Shao N; Wei Y; Zhu Y; Ye DW
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Jan; 6(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 30217630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Impacts of Clinical Laboratory Based p2PSA Indexes on any Grade, Gleason Grade Group 2 or Greater, or 3 or Greater Prostate Cancer and Prostate Specific Antigen below 10 ng/ml.
Ito K; Yokomizo A; Tokunaga S; Arai G; Sugimoto M; Akakura K; Hasumi H; Sakai H; Ouraji A; Oki R; Kashiwagi E; Kobori Y; Hirama H; Kitoh H; Uemura H; Hakariya T; Suzuki K;
J Urol; 2020 Jan; 203(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 31430244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging predict upgrading of transrectal ultrasound biopsy results at more definitive histology?
Abd-Alazeez M; Ahmed HU; Arya M; Allen C; Dikaios N; Freeman A; Emberton M; Kirkham A
Urol Oncol; 2014 Aug; 32(6):741-7. PubMed ID: 24981993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic Resonance and Ultrasound Image Fusion Supported Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using the Ginsburg Protocol: Technique, Learning Points, and Biopsy Results.
Hansen N; Patruno G; Wadhwa K; Gaziev G; Miano R; Barrett T; Gnanapragasam V; Doble A; Warren A; Bratt O; Kastner C
Eur Urol; 2016 Aug; 70(2):332-40. PubMed ID: 26995327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients.
Caster JM; Falchook AD; Hendrix LH; Chen RC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 25841621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
