145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33010682)
21. Added value of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging for assessing suspicious microcalcification on screening mammography-a prospective study.
Gweon HM; Eun NL; Youk JH; Jeong J; Bae SJ; Ahn SG; Kim JA; Son EJ
Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):815-821. PubMed ID: 34342691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Use of artificial neural networks (computer analysis) in the diagnosis of microcalcifications on mammography.
Markopoulos C; Kouskos E; Koufopoulos K; Kyriakou V; Gogas J
Eur J Radiol; 2001 Jul; 39(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11439232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic Performance of Mammographic Texture Analysis in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors.
Li Z; Yu L; Wang X; Yu H; Gao Y; Ren Y; Wang G; Zhou X
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e621-e627. PubMed ID: 29199085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.
Spangler ML; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Abrams G; Ganott MA; Hakim C; Perrin R; Chough DM; Shah R; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 21257882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Surgical biopsy is still necessary for BI-RADS 4 calcifications found on digital mammography that are technically too faint for stereotactic core biopsy.
Jeffries DO; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Joe AI; Pinsky RW; Goodsitt MM; Helvie MA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Dec; 154(3):557-61. PubMed ID: 26589316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Peri-lesion regions in differentiating suspicious breast calcification-only lesions specifically on contrast enhanced mammography.
Cao K; Gao F; Long R; Zhang FD; Huang CC; Cao M; Yu YZ; Sun YS
J Xray Sci Technol; 2024; 32(3):583-596. PubMed ID: 38306089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Histological correlation of mammographically detected microcalcifications in stereotactic core biopsies.
Dahlstrom JE; Jain S
Pathology; 2001 Nov; 33(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 11827410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.
Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Radiologic-histopathologic correlation of microcalcifications from 11g vacuum biopsy: analysis of 3196 core biopsies].
Fischmann A; Pietsch-Breitfeld B; Müller-Schimpfle M; Siegmann K; Wersebe A; Rothenberger-Janzen K; Claussen CD; Janzen J
Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 15088178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Breast cancer diagnosis: analyzing texture of tissue surrounding microcalcifications.
Karahaliou AN; Boniatis IS; Skiadopoulos SG; Sakellaropoulos FN; Arikidis NS; Likaki EA; Panayiotakis GS; Costaridou LI
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Nov; 12(6):731-8. PubMed ID: 19000952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Can positron emission mammography help to identify clinically significant breast cancer in women with suspicious calcifications on mammography?
Bitencourt AG; Lima EN; Macedo BR; Conrado JL; Marques EF; Chojniak R
Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1893-1900. PubMed ID: 27585658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification.
Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Wolverton DE; Metz CE; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Vyborny CJ; Doi K
Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 8628853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.
Lee HS; Hong H; Jung DC; Park S; Kim J
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3604-3614. PubMed ID: 28376281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Simplifying Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification of mammograms with pure suspicious calcifications.
Menezes GL; Winter-Warnars GA; Koekenbier EL; Groen EJ; Verkooijen HM; Pijnappel RM
J Med Screen; 2018 Jun; 25(2):82-87. PubMed ID: 28691862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories.
Bent CK; Bassett LW; D'Orsi CJ; Sayre JW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1378-83. PubMed ID: 20410428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinico-radiological characteristic-based machine learning in reducing unnecessary prostate biopsies of PI-RADS 3 lesions with dual validation.
Kan Y; Zhang Q; Hao J; Wang W; Zhuang J; Gao J; Huang H; Liang J; Marra G; Calleris G; Oderda M; Zhao X; Gontero P; Guo H
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6274-6284. PubMed ID: 32524222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Calcifications with suspicious morphology at mammography: should they all be considered with the same clinical significance?
Choi WJ; Han K; Shin HJ; Lee J; Kim EK; Yoon JH
Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):2529-2538. PubMed ID: 32960330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS.
Kim SY; Kim HY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2895-901. PubMed ID: 25608770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
