These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33011348)
1. Adding polyvinylpyrrolidone to low level protein samples significantly improves peptide recovery in FASP digests: An inexpensive and simple modification to the FASP protocol. Tremblay TL; Hill JJ J Proteomics; 2021 Jan; 230():104000. PubMed ID: 33011348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modified filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) method increases peptide and protein identifications for shotgun proteomics. Ni MW; Wang L; Chen W; Mou HZ; Zhou J; Zheng ZG Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2017 Jan; 31(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 27794190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of In-Solution, FASP, and S-Trap Based Digestion Methods for Bottom-Up Proteomic Studies. Ludwig KR; Schroll MM; Hummon AB J Proteome Res; 2018 Jul; 17(7):2480-2490. PubMed ID: 29754492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of protein and peptide fractionation approaches in protein identification and quantification from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Deng L; Handler DCL; Multari DH; Haynes PA J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2021 Jan; 1162():122453. PubMed ID: 33279813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliable FASP-based procedures for optimal quantitative proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis on samples from acute myeloid leukemia patients. Hernandez-Valladares M; Aasebø E; Mjaavatten O; Vaudel M; Bruserud Ø; Berven F; Selheim F Biol Proced Online; 2016; 18():13. PubMed ID: 27330413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhanced FASP (eFASP) to increase proteome coverage and sample recovery for quantitative proteomic experiments. Erde J; Loo RR; Loo JA J Proteome Res; 2014 Apr; 13(4):1885-95. PubMed ID: 24552128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Filter-Aided Sample Preparation: The Versatile and Efficient Method for Proteomic Analysis. Wiśniewski JR Methods Enzymol; 2017; 585():15-27. PubMed ID: 28109427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two FFPE preparation methods using label-free shotgun proteomics: Application to tissues of diverticulitis patients. Quesada-Calvo F; Bertrand V; Longuespée R; Delga A; Mazzucchelli G; Smargiasso N; Baiwir D; Delvenne P; Malaise M; De Pauw-Gillet MC; De Pauw E; Louis E; Meuwis MA J Proteomics; 2015 Jan; 112():250-61. PubMed ID: 25218866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative reevaluation of FASP and enhanced FASP methods by LC-MS/MS. Nel AJ; Garnett S; Blackburn JM; Soares NC J Proteome Res; 2015 Mar; 14(3):1637-42. PubMed ID: 25619111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Protein identification and quantification from riverbank grape, Vitis riparia: Comparing SDS-PAGE and FASP-GPF techniques for shotgun proteomic analysis. George IS; Fennell AY; Haynes PA Proteomics; 2015 Sep; 15(17):3061-5. PubMed ID: 25929842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative Evaluation of Filter Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) and Multienzyme Digestion FASP Protocols. Wiśniewski JR Anal Chem; 2016 May; 88(10):5438-43. PubMed ID: 27119963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of six sample preparation procedures for qualitative and quantitative proteomics analysis of milk fat globule membrane. Yang Y; Anderson E; Zhang S Electrophoresis; 2018 Sep; 39(18):2332-2339. PubMed ID: 29644703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of different digestion methods for proteomic analysis of isolated cells and FFPE tissue samples. Pirog A; Faktor J; Urban-Wojciuk Z; Kote S; Chruściel E; Arcimowicz Ł; Marek-Trzonkowska N; Vojtesek B; Hupp TR; Al Shboul S; Brennan PM; Smoleński RT; Goodlett DR; Dapic I Talanta; 2021 Oct; 233():122568. PubMed ID: 34215064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of FASP, SP3, and iST Protocols for Proteomic Sample Preparation in the Low Microgram Range. Sielaff M; Kuharev J; Bohn T; Hahlbrock J; Bopp T; Tenzer S; Distler U J Proteome Res; 2017 Nov; 16(11):4060-4072. PubMed ID: 28948796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics. Milkovska-Stamenova S; Wölk M; Hoffmann R Molecules; 2021 Nov; 26(22):. PubMed ID: 34833908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Label-Free Quantitative Analysis of Mitochondrial Proteomes Using the Multienzyme Digestion-Filter Aided Sample Preparation (MED-FASP) and "Total Protein Approach". Wiśniewski JR Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1567():69-77. PubMed ID: 28276014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]